From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] drm/xe: Start using ggtt->start in preparation of balloon removal
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 14:54:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19b3bf2d-99f0-4c88-8c2d-85a414f46eb1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251010120655.1046007-11-dev@lankhorst.se>
On 10/10/2025 2:06 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Instead of having ggtt->size point to the end of ggtt, have ggtt->size
> be the actual size of the GGTT, and introduce ggtt->start to point to
> the beginning of GGTT.
>
> This will allow a massive cleanup of GGTT in case of SRIOV-VF.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c | 70 ++++++++++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt_types.h | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c | 4 +-
> 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> index 33b09737ccba8..1fcb128e661b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> @@ -124,10 +124,20 @@ static void ggtt_update_access_counter(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
> }
> }
>
don't forget to add kernel-doc for all new public functions
> +u64 xe_ggtt_start(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
> +{
> + return ggtt->start;
> +}
> +
> +u64 xe_ggtt_size(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
> +{
> + return ggtt->size;
> +}
> +
> static void xe_ggtt_set_pte(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u64 addr, u64 pte)
> {
> xe_tile_assert(ggtt->tile, !(addr & XE_PTE_MASK));
> - xe_tile_assert(ggtt->tile, addr < ggtt->size);
> + xe_tile_assert(ggtt->tile, addr < ggtt->start + ggtt->size);
shouldn't we also check for
xe_tile_assert(ggtt->tile, addr >= ggtt->start);
>
> writeq(pte, &ggtt->gsm[addr >> XE_PTE_SHIFT]);
> }
> @@ -233,16 +243,16 @@ static const struct xe_ggtt_pt_ops xelpg_pt_wa_ops = {
> .ggtt_set_pte = xe_ggtt_set_pte_and_flush,
> };
>
> -static void __xe_ggtt_init_early(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u32 reserved)
> +static void __xe_ggtt_init_early(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u64 start, u64 size)
> {
> - drm_mm_init(&ggtt->mm, reserved,
> - ggtt->size - reserved);
> + ggtt->start = start;
> + ggtt->size = size;
> + drm_mm_init(&ggtt->mm, start, size);
since drm_mm is internal detail of the ggtt then maybe we should aim to just make this as:
drm_mm_init(&ggtt->mm, 0, size);
and add "start" only in relevant ggtt_node functions (as ggtt_node is/will be also private)
then we even will not require patch 2/6 since this "start" will be fully own by our ggtt
> }
>
> -int xe_ggtt_init_kunit(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u32 reserved, u32 size)
> +int xe_ggtt_init_kunit(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u32 start, u32 size)
> {
> - ggtt->size = size;
> - __xe_ggtt_init_early(ggtt, reserved);
> + __xe_ggtt_init_early(ggtt, start, size);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_ggtt_init_kunit);
> @@ -263,26 +273,32 @@ int xe_ggtt_init_early(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
> struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(ggtt->tile);
> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
> unsigned int gsm_size;
> + u64 ggtt_start, wopcm = xe_wopcm_size(xe), ggtt_size;
maybe it's just me, but mixing plain var declarations with some assignments is not making the code any easier
what about:
u64 wopcm = xe_wopcm_size(xe);
u64 ggtt_start, ggtt_size;
> int err;
>
> - if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe) || GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1250)
> - gsm_size = SZ_8M; /* GGTT is expected to be 4GiB */
> - else
> - gsm_size = probe_gsm_size(pdev);
> -
> - if (gsm_size == 0) {
> - xe_tile_err(ggtt->tile, "Hardware reported no preallocated GSM\n");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!IS_SRIOV_VF(xe)) {
> + if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1250)
> + gsm_size = SZ_8M; /* GGTT is expected to be 4GiB */
> + else
> + gsm_size = probe_gsm_size(pdev);
> + if (gsm_size == 0) {
> + xe_tile_err(ggtt->tile, "Hardware reported no preallocated GSM\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + ggtt_start = wopcm;
> + ggtt_size = (gsm_size / 8) * (u64) XE_PAGE_SIZE - ggtt_start;
> + } else {
> + /* GGTT is expected to be 4GiB */
> + ggtt_start = wopcm;
> + ggtt_size = SZ_4G - ggtt_start;
> }
>
> ggtt->gsm = ggtt->tile->mmio.regs + SZ_8M;
> - ggtt->size = (gsm_size / 8) * (u64) XE_PAGE_SIZE;
> -
> if (IS_DGFX(xe) && xe->info.vram_flags & XE_VRAM_FLAGS_NEED64K)
> ggtt->flags |= XE_GGTT_FLAGS_64K;
>
> - if (ggtt->size > GUC_GGTT_TOP)
> - ggtt->size = GUC_GGTT_TOP;
> + if (ggtt_size + ggtt_start > GUC_GGTT_TOP)
> + ggtt_size = GUC_GGTT_TOP - ggtt_start;
>
> if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1270)
> ggtt->pt_ops = (ggtt->tile->media_gt &&
> @@ -293,7 +309,7 @@ int xe_ggtt_init_early(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
> ggtt->pt_ops = &xelp_pt_ops;
>
> ggtt->wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-ggtt-wq", 0, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
> - __xe_ggtt_init_early(ggtt, xe_wopcm_size(xe));
> + __xe_ggtt_init_early(ggtt, ggtt_start, ggtt_size);
>
> err = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, ggtt_fini_early, ggtt);
> if (err)
> @@ -527,11 +543,9 @@ void xe_ggtt_node_remove_balloon_locked(struct xe_ggtt_node *node)
> static void xe_ggtt_assert_fit(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u64 start, u64 size)
> {
> struct xe_tile *tile = ggtt->tile;
> - struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
> - u64 __maybe_unused wopcm = xe_wopcm_size(xe);
>
> - xe_tile_assert(tile, start >= wopcm);
> - xe_tile_assert(tile, start + size < ggtt->size - wopcm);
> + xe_tile_assert(tile, start >= ggtt->start);
> + xe_tile_assert(tile, start + size <= ggtt->start + ggtt->size);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -840,14 +854,12 @@ u64 xe_ggtt_largest_hole(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u64 alignment, u64 *spare)
> {
> const struct drm_mm *mm = &ggtt->mm;
> const struct drm_mm_node *entry;
> - u64 hole_min_start = xe_wopcm_size(tile_to_xe(ggtt->tile));
> u64 hole_start, hole_end, hole_size;
> u64 max_hole = 0;
>
> mutex_lock(&ggtt->lock);
> -
> drm_mm_for_each_hole(entry, mm, hole_start, hole_end) {
> - hole_start = max(hole_start, hole_min_start);
> + hole_start = max(hole_start, ggtt->start);
> hole_start = ALIGN(hole_start, alignment);
> hole_end = ALIGN_DOWN(hole_end, alignment);
> if (hole_start >= hole_end)
> @@ -940,15 +952,13 @@ u64 xe_ggtt_print_holes(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u64 alignment, struct drm_printer
> {
> const struct drm_mm *mm = &ggtt->mm;
> const struct drm_mm_node *entry;
> - u64 hole_min_start = xe_wopcm_size(tile_to_xe(ggtt->tile));
> u64 hole_start, hole_end, hole_size;
> u64 total = 0;
> char buf[10];
>
> mutex_lock(&ggtt->lock);
> -
> drm_mm_for_each_hole(entry, mm, hole_start, hole_end) {
> - hole_start = max(hole_start, hole_min_start);
> + hole_start = max(hole_start, ggtt->start);
> hole_start = ALIGN(hole_start, alignment);
> hole_end = ALIGN_DOWN(hole_end, alignment);
> if (hole_start >= hole_end)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h
> index 75fc7a1efea76..6482bddb2ef36 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ int xe_ggtt_node_insert_balloon_locked(struct xe_ggtt_node *node,
> u64 start, u64 size);
> void xe_ggtt_node_remove_balloon_locked(struct xe_ggtt_node *node);
> void xe_ggtt_shift_nodes_locked(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, s64 shift);
> +u64 xe_ggtt_start(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt);
> +u64 xe_ggtt_size(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt);
>
> int xe_ggtt_node_insert(struct xe_ggtt_node *node, u32 size, u32 align);
> int xe_ggtt_node_insert_locked(struct xe_ggtt_node *node,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt_types.h
> index c5e999d58ff2a..a27919302d6b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt_types.h
> @@ -22,7 +22,9 @@ struct xe_gt;
> struct xe_ggtt {
> /** @tile: Back pointer to tile where this GGTT belongs */
> struct xe_tile *tile;
> - /** @size: Total size of this GGTT */
> + /** @start: Start offset of GGTT */
> + u64 start;
> + /** @size: Total usable size of this GGTT */
> u64 size;
>
> #define XE_GGTT_FLAGS_64K BIT(0)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> index b2e5c52978e6a..2289756761636 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> @@ -343,8 +343,8 @@ static int pf_push_full_vf_config(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int vfid)
> xe_gt_assert(gt, num_dwords <= max_cfg_dwords);
>
> if (vfid == PFID) {
> - u64 ggtt_start = xe_wopcm_size(gt_to_xe(gt));
> - u64 ggtt_size = gt_to_tile(gt)->mem.ggtt->size - ggtt_start;
> + u64 ggtt_start = xe_ggtt_start(gt_to_tile(gt)->mem.ggtt);
> + u64 ggtt_size = xe_ggtt_size(gt_to_tile(gt)->mem.ggtt);
>
> /* plain PF config data will never include a real GGTT region */
> xe_gt_assert(gt, !encode_config_ggtt(cfg + num_dwords, config, true));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-10 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-10 12:06 [PATCH v5 0/6] drm/xe: Make struct xe_ggtt private Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-10 12:06 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] drm/xe: Only have a single drmm release action Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-10 12:14 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-10 13:15 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-10 12:06 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] drm/mm: Introduce address space shifting Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-10 12:06 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] drm/xe: Start using ggtt->start in preparation of balloon removal Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-10 12:54 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-10-10 12:07 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] drm/xe: Rewrite GGTT VF initialisation Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-10 15:00 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-10 15:34 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-10 12:07 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] drm/xe: Convert xe_fb_pin to use a callback for insertion into GGTT Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-10 12:07 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] drm/xe: Move struct xe_ggtt to xe_ggtt.c Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-10 15:05 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-13 17:54 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-10 13:30 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Make struct xe_ggtt private. (rev5) Patchwork
2025-10-10 13:32 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-10 13:50 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-10-10 14:14 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-10-10 18:57 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19b3bf2d-99f0-4c88-8c2d-85a414f46eb1@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox