[PATCH v5 1/6] drm/xe: Only have a single drmm release action.

[Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>]

The broken action happened after ggtt_early_fini, so
it's safe to put the drain_workqueue in there instead of
creating a new place.

Fixes: 89d2835c3680 ("drm/xe: Process deferred GGTT node removals on device unwind")
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c | 12 +-----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
index aca7ae5489b91..33b09737ccba8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ static void ggtt_fini_early(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
 {
 	struct xe_ggtt *ggtt = arg;
 
+	drain_workqueue(ggtt->wq);
 	destroy_workqueue(ggtt->wq);
 	drm_mm_takedown(&ggtt->mm);
 }
@@ -246,13 +247,6 @@ int xe_ggtt_init_kunit(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u32 reserved, u32 size)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_ggtt_init_kunit);
 
-static void dev_fini_ggtt(void *arg)
-{
-	struct xe_ggtt *ggtt = arg;
-
-	drain_workqueue(ggtt->wq);
-}
-
 /**
  * xe_ggtt_init_early - Early GGTT initialization
  * @ggtt: the &xe_ggtt to be initialized
@@ -305,10 +299,6 @@ int xe_ggtt_init_early(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	err = devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, dev_fini_ggtt, ggtt);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-
 	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe)) {
 		err = xe_tile_sriov_vf_prepare_ggtt(ggtt->tile);
 		if (err)
-- 
2.51.0