From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] drm/xe/vf: Introduce RESFIX start marker support
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 17:17:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1dc47e29-cc98-40a5-b0bd-d47eaccbc75d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251124160719.29812-7-satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
On 11/24/2025 5:07 PM, Satyanarayana K V P wrote:
> In scenarios involving double migration, the VF KMD may encounter
> situations where it is instructed to re-migrate before having the
> opportunity to send RESFIX_DONE for the initial migration. This can occur
> when the fix-up for the prior migration is still underway, but the VF KMD
> is migrated again.
>
> Consequently, this may lead to the possibility of sending two migration
> notifications (i.e., pending fix-up for the first migration and a second
> notification for the new migration). Upon receiving the first RES_FIX
> notification, the GuC will resume VF submission on the GPU, potentially
> resulting in undefined behavior, such as system hangs or crashes.
>
> To avoid this, post migration, a marker is sent to the GUC prior to the
> start of resource fixups to indicate start of resource fixups. The same
> marker is sent along with RESFIX_DONE notification so that GUC can avoid
> submitting jobs to HW in case of double migration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
>
> ---
> V5 -> V6:
> - Fixed review comments (Michal W).
> - Updated resfix_done and res_fix_start function names.
> - Handled XE_GUC_RESPONSE_VF_MIGRATED error case received from GuC.
> - Remove skip_resfix error when another migration is in queue.
>
> V4 -> V5:
> - Fixed review comments (Michal W).
> - Fixed minor debug log levels and documentation part.
> - Moved complete marker logic to vf_post_migration_resfix_start_marker()
>
> V3 -> V4:
> - Updated RESFIX_DONE action name and documenation part. (Michal W)
> - Enable resfxi_start marked by default as sav/restore is gated on
> Guc version 70.54.0
>
> V2 -> V3:
> - Fixed review comments (Michal W).
> - Updated commit message.
> - Fixed CI.BAT issues.
> - Added helper function to assert on unsupported GUC versions.
> - Updated RESFIX_DONE action name and documenation part.
>
> V1 -> V2:
> - Squashed "Enable RESFIX start marker only on supported GUC
> versions" commit into a single commit. (Matt B)
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_sriov_abi.h | 67 +++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c | 99 ++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h | 5 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 13 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c | 40 +++++++-
> 5 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_sriov_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_sriov_abi.h
> index 0b28659d94e9..d9f21202e1a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_sriov_abi.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_sriov_abi.h
> @@ -502,13 +502,17 @@
> #define VF2GUC_VF_RESET_RESPONSE_MSG_0_MBZ GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_0_DATA0
>
> /**
> - * DOC: VF2GUC_NOTIFY_RESFIX_DONE
> + * DOC: VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE
> *
> - * This action is used by VF to notify the GuC that the VF KMD has completed
> - * post-migration recovery steps.
> + * This action is used by VF to inform the GuC that the VF KMD has completed
> + * post-migration recovery steps. From GuC VF compatibility 1.27.0 onwards, it
> + * shall only be sent after posting RESFIX_START and that both @MARKER fields
> + * must match.
> *
> * This message must be sent as `MMIO HXG Message`_.
> *
> + * Updated since GuC VF compatibility 1.27.0.
> + *
> * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> * | | Bits | Description |
> * +===+=======+==============================================================+
> @@ -516,9 +520,11 @@
> * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> * | | 30:28 | TYPE = GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST_ |
> * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> - * | | 27:16 | DATA0 = MBZ |
> + * | | 27:16 | DATA0 = MARKER = MBZ (only prior 1.27.0) |
> * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> - * | | 15:0 | ACTION = _`GUC_ACTION_VF2GUC_NOTIFY_RESFIX_DONE` = 0x5508 |
> + * | | 27:16 | DATA0 = MARKER - can't be zero (1.27.0+) |
> + * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> + * | | 15:0 | ACTION = _`GUC_ACTION_VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE` = 0x5508 |
> * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> *
> * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> @@ -531,13 +537,13 @@
> * | | 27:0 | DATA0 = MBZ |
> * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> */
> -#define GUC_ACTION_VF2GUC_NOTIFY_RESFIX_DONE 0x5508u
> +#define GUC_ACTION_VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE 0x5508u
>
> -#define VF2GUC_NOTIFY_RESFIX_DONE_REQUEST_MSG_LEN GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_MIN_LEN
> -#define VF2GUC_NOTIFY_RESFIX_DONE_REQUEST_MSG_0_MBZ GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_DATA0
> +#define VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE_REQUEST_MSG_LEN GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_MIN_LEN
> +#define VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE_REQUEST_MSG_0_MARKER GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_DATA0
>
> -#define VF2GUC_NOTIFY_RESFIX_DONE_RESPONSE_MSG_LEN GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_MIN_LEN
> -#define VF2GUC_NOTIFY_RESFIX_DONE_RESPONSE_MSG_0_MBZ GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_0_DATA0
> +#define VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE_RESPONSE_MSG_LEN GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_MIN_LEN
> +#define VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE_RESPONSE_MSG_0_MBZ GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_0_DATA0
>
> /**
> * DOC: VF2GUC_QUERY_SINGLE_KLV
> @@ -656,4 +662,45 @@
> #define PF2GUC_SAVE_RESTORE_VF_RESPONSE_MSG_LEN GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_MIN_LEN
> #define PF2GUC_SAVE_RESTORE_VF_RESPONSE_MSG_0_USED GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_0_DATA0
>
> +/**
> + * DOC: VF2GUC_RESFIX_START
> + *
> + * This action is used by VF to inform the GuC that the VF KMD will be starting
> + * post-migration recovery fixups. The @MARKER sent with this action must match
> + * with the MARKER posted in the VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE message.
> + *
> + * This message must be sent as `MMIO HXG Message`_.
> + *
> + * Available since GuC VF compatibility 1.27.0.
> + *
> + * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> + * | | Bits | Description |
> + * +===+=======+==============================================================+
> + * | 0 | 31 | ORIGIN = GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_HOST_ |
> + * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> + * | | 30:28 | TYPE = GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST_ |
> + * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> + * | | 27:16 | DATA0 = MARKER - can't be zero |
> + * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> + * | | 15:0 | ACTION = _`GUC_ACTION_VF2GUC_RESFIX_START` = 0x550F |
> + * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> + *
> + * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> + * | | Bits | Description |
> + * +===+=======+==============================================================+
> + * | 0 | 31 | ORIGIN = GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC_ |
> + * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> + * | | 30:28 | TYPE = GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_SUCCESS_ |
> + * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> + * | | 27:0 | DATA0 = MBZ |
> + * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
> + */
> +#define GUC_ACTION_VF2GUC_RESFIX_START 0x550Fu
> +
> +#define VF2GUC_RESFIX_START_REQUEST_MSG_LEN GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_MIN_LEN
> +#define VF2GUC_RESFIX_START_REQUEST_MSG_0_MARKER GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_DATA0
> +
> +#define VF2GUC_RESFIX_START_RESPONSE_MSG_LEN GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_MIN_LEN
> +#define VF2GUC_RESFIX_START_RESPONSE_MSG_0_MBZ GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_0_DATA0
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> index 4c73a077d314..8e3fba6521f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> @@ -299,12 +299,13 @@ void xe_gt_sriov_vf_guc_versions(struct xe_gt *gt,
> *found = gt->sriov.vf.guc_version;
> }
>
> -static int guc_action_vf_notify_resfix_done(struct xe_guc *guc)
> +static int guc_action_vf_resfix_start(struct xe_guc *guc, u16 marker)
> {
> u32 request[GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_MIN_LEN] = {
> FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_HOST) |
> FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST) |
> - FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_ACTION, GUC_ACTION_VF2GUC_NOTIFY_RESFIX_DONE),
> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_ACTION, GUC_ACTION_VF2GUC_RESFIX_START) |
> + FIELD_PREP(VF2GUC_RESFIX_START_REQUEST_MSG_0_MARKER, marker),
> };
> int ret;
>
> @@ -313,30 +314,54 @@ static int guc_action_vf_notify_resfix_done(struct xe_guc *guc)
> return ret > 0 ? -EPROTO : ret;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * vf_notify_resfix_done - Notify GuC about resource fixups apply completed.
> - * @gt: the &xe_gt struct instance linked to target GuC
> - *
> - * Returns: 0 if the operation completed successfully, or a negative error
> - * code otherwise.
> - */
> -static int vf_notify_resfix_done(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +static int vf_resfix_start(struct xe_gt *gt, u16 marker)
> {
> struct xe_guc *guc = >->uc.guc;
> int err;
>
> xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
>
> - err = guc_action_vf_notify_resfix_done(guc);
> + xe_gt_sriov_dbg_verbose(gt, "Sending resfix start marker %u\n", marker);
> +
> + err = guc_action_vf_resfix_start(guc, marker);
> if (unlikely(err))
> - xe_gt_sriov_err(gt, "Failed to notify GuC about resource fixup done (%pe)\n",
> + xe_gt_sriov_err(gt, "Recovery failed at GuC RESFIX_START step (%pe)\n",
> ERR_PTR(err));
maybe better fit for this error is the caller ? vf_post_migration_recovery
> - else
> - xe_gt_sriov_dbg_verbose(gt, "sent GuC resource fixup done\n");
>
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int guc_action_vf_resfix_done(struct xe_guc *guc, u16 marker)
> +{
> + u32 request[GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_MIN_LEN] = {
> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_HOST) |
> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST) |
> + FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_ACTION, GUC_ACTION_VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE) |
> + FIELD_PREP(VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE_REQUEST_MSG_0_MARKER, marker),
> + };
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = xe_guc_mmio_send(guc, request, ARRAY_SIZE(request));
> +
> + return ret > 0 ? -EPROTO : ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vf_resfix_done(struct xe_gt *gt, u16 marker)
> +{
> + struct xe_guc *guc = >->uc.guc;
> + int err;
> +
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> +
> + xe_gt_sriov_dbg_verbose(gt, "Sending resfix done marker %u\n", marker);
> +
> + err = guc_action_vf_resfix_done(guc, marker);
> + if (unlikely(err && err != -EREMCHG))
> + xe_gt_sriov_err(gt, "Recovery failed at GuC RESFIX_DONE step (%pe)\n",
> + ERR_PTR(err));
same here
in case of VF2GUC status != VF_MIGRATED there will be already some error message from guc_send
and we have another check for -EREMCHG below, so maybe move this message just there?
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int guc_action_query_single_klv(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 key,
> u32 *value, u32 value_len)
> {
> @@ -1183,22 +1208,16 @@ static void vf_post_migration_abort(struct xe_gt *gt)
> xe_guc_submit_pause_abort(>->uc.guc);
> }
>
> -static int vf_post_migration_notify_resfix_done(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +static int vf_post_migration_resfix_done(struct xe_gt *gt, u16 marker)
> {
> - bool skip_resfix = false;
> -
> spin_lock_irq(>->sriov.vf.migration.lock);
> if (gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_queued) {
> - skip_resfix = true;
> - xe_gt_sriov_dbg(gt, "another recovery imminent, resfix skipped\n");
> + xe_gt_sriov_dbg(gt, "another recovery imminent\n");
> } else {
> WRITE_ONCE(gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_inprogress, false);
> }
> spin_unlock_irq(>->sriov.vf.migration.lock);
>
> - if (skip_resfix)
> - return -EAGAIN;
> -
> /*
> * Make sure interrupts on the new HW are properly set. The GuC IRQ
> * must be working at this point, since the recovery did started,
> @@ -1206,14 +1225,34 @@ static int vf_post_migration_notify_resfix_done(struct xe_gt *gt)
> */
> xe_irq_resume(gt_to_xe(gt));
>
> - return vf_notify_resfix_done(gt);
> + return vf_resfix_done(gt, marker);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Reset the marker to 1 after it overflows since GuC requires a non-zero
> + * marker to be set.
> + */
> +static u16 vf_post_migration_resfix_start_marker(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +{
> + u16 marker;
> +
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> +
> + marker = ++gt->sriov.vf.migration.resfix_marker;
> + if (unlikely(marker >= FIELD_MAX(VF2GUC_RESFIX_START_REQUEST_MSG_0_MARKER))) {
> + gt->sriov.vf.migration.resfix_marker = 1;
> + marker = gt->sriov.vf.migration.resfix_marker;
> + }
> +
> + return marker;
maybe we don't need all 4095 possible different markers?
I guess 255 different markers should be more than enough for debug
then can rely on the compiler:
+ * @resfix_marker: Marker sent on start and on end of post-migration
+ * steps.
+ */
+ u8 resfix_marker;
BUILD_BUG_ON(1 + typeof(gt->sriov.vf.migration.resfix_marker))~0 >
FIELD_MAX(VF2GUC_RESFIX_START_REQUEST_MSG_0_MARKER));
/* add 1 to avoid zero-marker */
return 1 + gt->sriov.vf.migration.resfix_marker++;
> }
>
> static void vf_post_migration_recovery(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> - int err;
> + u16 marker;
> bool retry;
> + int err;
>
> xe_gt_sriov_dbg(gt, "migration recovery in progress\n");
>
> @@ -1227,14 +1266,22 @@ static void vf_post_migration_recovery(struct xe_gt *gt)
> goto fail;
> }
>
> + marker = vf_post_migration_resfix_start_marker(gt);
> +
> + err = vf_resfix_start(gt, marker);
> + if (err)
> + goto fail;
> +
> err = vf_post_migration_fixups(gt);
> if (err)
> goto fail;
>
> vf_post_migration_rearm(gt);
>
> - err = vf_post_migration_notify_resfix_done(gt);
> - if (err && err != -EAGAIN)
> + err = vf_post_migration_resfix_done(gt, marker);
> + if (err == -EREMCHG)
> + goto queue;
> + else if (err)
'else' not needed after 'goto'
> goto fail;
>
> vf_post_migration_kickstart(gt);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h
> index 420b0e6089de..66c0062a42c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,11 @@ struct xe_gt_sriov_vf_migration {
> wait_queue_head_t wq;
> /** @scratch: Scratch memory for VF recovery */
> void *scratch;
> + /**
> + * @resfix_marker: Marker sent on start and on end of post-migration
> + * steps.
> + */
> + u16 resfix_marker;
> /** @recovery_teardown: VF post migration recovery is being torn down */
> bool recovery_teardown;
> /** @recovery_queued: VF post migration recovery in queued */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index cf92de1c88a7..cf9820e036fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
this change below should be placed in a separate patch with separate commit msg
> @@ -1483,9 +1483,16 @@ int xe_guc_mmio_send_recv(struct xe_guc *guc, const u32 *request,
> u32 hint = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_FAILURE_MSG_0_HINT, header);
> u32 error = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_FAILURE_MSG_0_ERROR, header);
>
> - xe_gt_err(gt, "GuC mmio request %#x: failure %#x hint %#x\n",
> - request[0], error, hint);
> - return -ENXIO;
> + if (error == XE_GUC_RESPONSE_VF_MIGRATED) {
> + xe_gt_dbg(gt, "GuC mmio request %#x: failure %#x hint %#x\n",
> + request[0], error, hint);
since we know it's a VF_MIGRATED status, we may use more tailored message:
"GuC mmio request %#x rejected due to MIGRATION (hint %#x)\n"
> + ret = -EREMCHG;
and you may "return -EREMCHG;" immediately here
> + } else {
> + xe_gt_err(gt, "GuC mmio request %#x: failure %#x hint %#x\n",
> + request[0], error, hint);
> + ret = -ENXIO;
> + }
> + return ret;
this will leave existing code as-is
> }
>
> if (FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, header) !=
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> index f53d68f2f1d2..0cc6ca3082e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> @@ -49,11 +49,13 @@
> *
> * As soon as Virtual GPU of the VM starts, the VF driver within receives
> * the MIGRATED interrupt and schedules post-migration recovery worker.
> - * That worker queries GuC for new provisioning (using MMIO communication),
> + * That worker sends `VF2GUC_RESFIX_START` action along with non-zero
> + * marker, queries GuC for new provisioning (using MMIO communication),
> * and applies fixups to any non-virtualized resources used by the VF.
> *
> * When the VF driver is ready to continue operation on the newly connected
> - * hardware, it sends `VF2GUC_NOTIFY_RESFIX_DONE` which causes it to
> + * hardware, it sends `VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE` action along with the same
> + * marker which was sent with `VF2GUC_RESFIX_START` which causes it to
> * enter the long awaited `VF_RUNNING` state, and therefore start handling
> * CTB messages and scheduling workloads from the VF::
> *
> @@ -102,12 +104,17 @@
> * | [ ] new VF provisioning [ ]
> * | [ ]---------------------------> [ ]
> * | | [ ]
> + * | | VF2GUC_RESFIX_START [ ]
> + * | [ ] <---------------------------[ ]
> + * | [ ] [ ]
> + * | [ ] success [ ]
> + * | [ ]---------------------------> [ ]
> * | | VF driver applies post [ ]
> * | | migration fixups -------[ ]
> * | | | [ ]
> * | | -----> [ ]
> * | | [ ]
> - * | | VF2GUC_NOTIFY_RESFIX_DONE [ ]
> + * | | VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE [ ]
> * | [ ] <---------------------------[ ]
> * | [ ] [ ]
> * | [ ] GuC sets new VF state to [ ]
> @@ -118,6 +125,33 @@
> * | [ ]---------------------------> [ ]
> * | | |
> * | | |
> + *
> + * Handling of VF double migration flow is shown below::
> + *
> + * GuC VF
> + * | |
> + * [ ] VF2GUC_RESFIX_START [ ] <--------
> + * [ ] <-------------------------------------------[ ] |
> + * [ ] [ ] |
> + * [ ] success [ ] |
> + * [ ] ------------------------------------------> [ ] |
> + * | VF driver applies post migration fixups [ ] |
> + * | -------[ ] Restart |
> + * | | [ ] fixup |
> + * | -----> [ ] process |
> + * | [ ] again |
> + * | VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE [ ] |
> + * [ ] <-------------------------------------------[ ] |
> + * [ ] [ ] |
> + * [ ] Error - XE_GUC_RESPONSE_VF_MIGRATED [ ] |
> + * [ ] (new migration was detected while the [ ] |
> + * [ ] resfix process was still in progress) [ ] |
> + * [ ] ------------------------------------------> [ ] --------->
there is no 'go back' in sequence diagrams
> + * [ ] [ ]
> + * [ ] success [ ]
> + * [ ] ------------------------------------------> [ ]
'success' is only in regular migration fixup scenario (covered by diagram above)
> + * | |
> + * | |
so maybe:
* GuC1 VF
* | |
* | [ ]<--- start fixups
* | VF2GUC_RESFIX_START(marker) [ ]
* [ ] <-------------------------------------------[ ]
* [ ] [ ]
* [ ]---\ [ ]
* [ ] store marker [ ]
* [ ]<--/ [ ]
* [ ] [ ]
* [ ] success [ ]
* [ ] ------------------------------------------> [ ]
* | [ ]
* | [ ]---\
* | [ ] do fixups
* | [ ]<--/
* | [ ]
* x ============== VF paused / saved ==================
*
* GuC2
* |
* | ============== VF restored ========================
* [ ]
* [ ]---\
* [ ] reset marker
* [ ]<--/
* [ ]
* | ============== VF resumed =========================
* | [ ]
* | [ ]
* | VF2GUC_RESFIX_DONE(marker) [ ]
* [ ] <-------------------------------------------[ ]
* [ ] [ ]
* [ ]---\ [ ]
* [ ] check marker [ ]
* [ ] (mismatch) [ ]
* [ ]<--/ [ ]
* [ ] [ ]
* [ ] RESPONSE_VF_MIGRATED [ ]
* [ ] ------------------------------------------> [ ]
* | [ ]---\
* | [ ] reschedule fixups
* | [ ]<--/
* | |
> */
>
> /**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-27 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-24 16:07 [PATCH v6 0/3] VF double migration Satyanarayana K V P
2025-11-24 16:07 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] drm/xe/vf: Enable VF migration only on supported GuC versions Satyanarayana K V P
2025-11-27 14:45 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-24 16:07 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] drm/xe/vf: Introduce RESFIX start marker support Satyanarayana K V P
2025-11-27 16:17 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-11-24 16:07 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/xe/vf: Add debugfs entries to test VF double migration Satyanarayana K V P
2025-11-27 16:51 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-25 3:30 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for VF double migration (rev6) Patchwork
2025-11-25 4:08 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-25 6:55 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1dc47e29-cc98-40a5-b0bd-d47eaccbc75d@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
--cc=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox