From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <matthew.brost@intel.com>, <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
<michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>, <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
<michal.winiarski@intel.com>, <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
<maarten@lankhorst.se>, <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
<lukasz.laguna@intel.com>, <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>,
<lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/9] drm/xe/exec_queue: Introduce xe_exec_queue_reinit()
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:48:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f83cf41-b901-430e-8583-49f2a94b64e4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b30043f7-9143-4cd9-bfbd-38b6c5077153@intel.com>
On 4/15/2026 9:10 AM, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>
>
> On 4/6/2026 7:07 AM, Raag Jadav wrote:
>> In preparation of usecases which require re-initializing an exec queue
>> after PCIe FLR, introduce xe_exec_queue_reinit() helper. All the exec
>> queue LCRs already exist but the context is lost on PCIe FLR and needs
>> re-initialization.
>
> Isn't this potentially problematic for userspace? If they have state
> saved in their LRCs, that state would be lost without any way for the
> user to know. New submission on those contexts might end up giving
> incorrect output without explanation.
> IMO it'd be better to just kill all the contexts and be done with it.
> FLR is a full reset and I don't think apps are supposed to survive it
> without noticing.
Just realized looking at the follow up patches that this is only called
for the migration queue, which is kernel-owned. If we're only expecting
to re-init kernel queues that needs to be documented and we need an
assert in code.
>
> Daniele
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
>> ---
>> v2: Re-initialize migrate context (Matthew Brost)
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c | 17 ++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h | 2 ++
>> 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
>> index b287d0e0e60a..dd99bf766926 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
>> @@ -331,9 +331,8 @@ static void __xe_exec_queue_fini(struct
>> xe_exec_queue *q)
>> xe_lrc_put(q->lrc[i]);
>> }
>> -static int __xe_exec_queue_init(struct xe_exec_queue *q, u32
>> exec_queue_flags)
>> +static u32 xe_lrc_init_flags(struct xe_exec_queue *q, u32
>> exec_queue_flags)
>> {
>> - int i, err;
>> u32 flags = 0;
>> /*
>> @@ -356,6 +355,13 @@ static int __xe_exec_queue_init(struct
>> xe_exec_queue *q, u32 exec_queue_flags)
>> if (q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_DISABLE_STATE_CACHE_PERF_FIX)
>> flags |= XE_LRC_DISABLE_STATE_CACHE_PERF_FIX;
>> + return flags;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __xe_exec_queue_init(struct xe_exec_queue *q, u32
>> exec_queue_flags)
>> +{
>> + int i, err;
>> +
>> err = q->ops->init(q);
>> if (err)
>> return err;
>> @@ -379,8 +385,8 @@ static int __xe_exec_queue_init(struct
>> xe_exec_queue *q, u32 exec_queue_flags)
>> marker = xe_gt_sriov_vf_wait_valid_ggtt(q->gt);
>> - lrc = xe_lrc_create(q->hwe, q->vm, q->replay_state,
>> - xe_lrc_ring_size(), q->msix_vec, flags);
>> + lrc = xe_lrc_create(q->hwe, q->vm, q->replay_state,
>> xe_lrc_ring_size(),
>> + q->msix_vec, xe_lrc_init_flags(q,
>> exec_queue_flags));
>> if (IS_ERR(lrc)) {
>> err = PTR_ERR(lrc);
>> goto err_lrc;
>> @@ -402,6 +408,29 @@ static int __xe_exec_queue_init(struct
>> xe_exec_queue *q, u32 exec_queue_flags)
>> return err;
>> }
>> +/**
>> + * xe_exec_queue_reinit() - Re-initialize exec queue
>> + * @q: exec queue to re-initialize
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 0 on success, negative error code otherwise.
>> + */
>> +int xe_exec_queue_reinit(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>> +{
>> + int i, err;
>> +
>> + /* Re-initialize submission backend */
>> + q->ops->reinit(q);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < q->width; i++) {
>> + err = xe_lrc_reinit(q->lrc[i], q->hwe, q->vm, q->replay_state,
>> + q->msix_vec, xe_lrc_init_flags(q, q->flags));
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * xe_exec_queue_create() - Create an exec queue
>> * @xe: Xe device
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.h
>> index a82d99bd77bc..445867d4da26 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.h
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct xe_exec_queue
>> *xe_exec_queue_create_bind(struct xe_device *xe,
>> void xe_exec_queue_fini(struct xe_exec_queue *q);
>> void xe_exec_queue_destroy(struct kref *ref);
>> void xe_exec_queue_assign_name(struct xe_exec_queue *q, u32 instance);
>> +int xe_exec_queue_reinit(struct xe_exec_queue *q);
>> static inline struct xe_exec_queue *
>> xe_exec_queue_get_unless_zero(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
>> index 9d12a0d2f0b5..a6421ac3765b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
>> @@ -1593,6 +1593,23 @@ static int xe_lrc_ctx_init(struct xe_lrc *lrc,
>> struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, struct
>> return err;
>> }
>> +/**
>> + * xe_lrc_reinit() - Re-initialize LRC
>> + * @lrc: Pointer to the LRC
>> + * @hwe: Hardware Engine
>> + * @vm: The VM (address space)
>> + * @replay_state: GPU hang replay state
>> + * @msix_vec: MSI-X interrupt vector (for platforms that support it)
>> + * @init_flags: LRC initialization flags
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 0 on success, negative error code otherwise.
>> + */
>> +int xe_lrc_reinit(struct xe_lrc *lrc, struct xe_hw_engine *hwe,
>> struct xe_vm *vm,
>> + void *replay_state, u16 msix_vec, u32 init_flags)
>> +{
>> + return xe_lrc_ctx_init(lrc, hwe, vm, replay_state, msix_vec,
>> init_flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int xe_lrc_init(struct xe_lrc *lrc, struct xe_hw_engine
>> *hwe, struct xe_vm *vm,
>> void *replay_state, u32 ring_size, u16 msix_vec, u32
>> init_flags)
>> {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
>> index e7c975f9e2d9..514355ce3d6a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
>> @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ struct xe_lrc_snapshot {
>> struct xe_lrc *xe_lrc_create(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, struct
>> xe_vm *vm,
>> void *replay_state, u32 ring_size, u16 msix_vec,
>> u32 flags);
>> +int xe_lrc_reinit(struct xe_lrc *lrc, struct xe_hw_engine *hwe,
>> struct xe_vm *vm,
>> + void *replay_state, u16 msix_vec, u32 init_flags);
>> void xe_lrc_destroy(struct kref *ref);
>> /**
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-06 14:07 [PATCH v5 0/9] Introduce Xe PCIe FLR Raag Jadav
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] drm/xe/uc_fw: Allow re-initializing firmware Raag Jadav
2026-04-15 16:06 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] drm/xe/guc_submit: Introduce guc_exec_queue_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] drm/xe/gt: Introduce FLR helpers Raag Jadav
2026-04-15 16:25 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] drm/xe/irq: Introduce xe_irq_disable() Raag Jadav
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] drm/xe: Introduce xe_device_assert_lmem_ready() Raag Jadav
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] drm/xe/bo_evict: Introduce xe_bo_restore_map() Raag Jadav
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] drm/xe/exec_queue: Introduce xe_exec_queue_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-04-15 16:10 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-04-15 16:48 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2026-04-15 17:02 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] drm/xe/migrate: Introduce xe_migrate_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] drm/xe/pci: Introduce PCIe FLR Raag Jadav
2026-04-15 8:43 ` Laguna, Lukasz
2026-04-15 9:46 ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-15 10:33 ` Laguna, Lukasz
2026-04-15 10:54 ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-16 6:40 ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-15 16:45 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-04-06 14:18 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce Xe PCIe FLR (rev5) Patchwork
2026-04-06 14:19 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-04-06 14:54 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-06 18:08 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] Introduce Xe PCIe FLR Raag Jadav
2026-04-10 18:22 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2026-04-11 8:11 ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-15 15:47 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-04-16 6:19 ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-16 6:35 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1f83cf41-b901-430e-8583-49f2a94b64e4@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
--cc=maarten@lankhorst.se \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox