public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: "Laguna, Lukasz" <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.brost@intel.com,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com,
	riana.tauro@intel.com, michal.wajdeczko@intel.com,
	matthew.d.roper@intel.com, michal.winiarski@intel.com,
	matthew.auld@intel.com, maarten@lankhorst.se,
	jani.nikula@intel.com, zhanjun.dong@intel.com, lukas@wunner.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] drm/xe/pci: Introduce PCIe FLR
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:46:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad9eW3OlG6vCxOMs@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b6e0cd3-9d8c-42cd-8ca8-f67bb59110d4@intel.com>

On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 10:43:53AM +0200, Laguna, Lukasz wrote:
> On 4/6/2026 16:07, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > With bare minimum pieces in place, we can finally introduce PCIe Function
> > Level Reset (FLR) handling which re-initializes hardware state without the
> > need for reloading the driver from userspace. All VRAM contents are lost
> > along with hardware state and driver takes care of recreating the required
> > kernel bos as part of re-initialization, but user still needs to recreate
> > user bos and reload context after PCIe FLR.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Spell out Function Level Reset (Jani)
> > v5: Prevent PM ref leak for wedged device (Matthew Brost)
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile          |   1 +
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h |   3 +
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c          |   1 +
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.h          |   2 +
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_err.c      | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   5 files changed, 167 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_err.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > index f9abaf687d46..06b5d53e1629 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
> >   	xe_page_reclaim.o \
> >   	xe_pat.o \
> >   	xe_pci.o \
> > +	xe_pci_err.o \
> >   	xe_pci_rebar.o \
> >   	xe_pcode.o \
> >   	xe_pm.o \
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> > index 150c76b2acaf..b743b3986205 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> > @@ -482,6 +482,9 @@ struct xe_device {
> >   	/** @needs_flr_on_fini: requests function-reset on fini */
> >   	bool needs_flr_on_fini;
> > +	/** @flr_prepared: Prepared for function-reset */
> > +	bool flr_prepared;
> > +
> >   	/** @wedged: Struct to control Wedged States and mode */
> >   	struct {
> >   		/** @wedged.flag: Xe device faced a critical error and is now blocked. */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> > index 26eb58e11056..f3515c91e534 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> > @@ -1332,6 +1332,7 @@ static struct pci_driver xe_pci_driver = {
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> >   	.driver.pm = &xe_pm_ops,
> >   #endif
> > +	.err_handler = &xe_pci_err_handlers,
> >   };
> >   /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.h
> > index 11bcc5fe2c5b..85e85e8508c3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.h
> > @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
> >   struct pci_dev;
> > +extern const struct pci_error_handlers xe_pci_err_handlers;
> > +
> >   int xe_register_pci_driver(void);
> >   void xe_unregister_pci_driver(void);
> >   struct xe_device *xe_pci_to_pf_device(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_err.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_err.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..339e8688d37f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_err.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include "xe_bo_evict.h"
> > +#include "xe_device.h"
> > +#include "xe_gt.h"
> > +#include "xe_gt_idle.h"
> > +#include "xe_i2c.h"
> > +#include "xe_irq.h"
> > +#include "xe_late_bind_fw.h"
> > +#include "xe_pci.h"
> > +#include "xe_pcode.h"
> > +#include "xe_printk.h"
> > +#include "xe_pxp.h"
> > +#include "xe_wa.h"
> > +
> > +/* TODO: Extend support as a follow-up */
> > +#define XE_FLR_SKIP		(!IS_DGFX(xe) || IS_SRIOV_VF(xe) || pci_num_vf(pdev) || \
> 
> Any known issues on integrated platforms? I checked it on PTL and didn't
> notice any problems. Everything seems to work fine with display disabled.

Thank you. Can I add your Tested-by on this? I can include integrated
in next rev with it.

Raag

> > +				 xe->info.probe_display)
> > +
> > +static int xe_flr_prepare(struct xe_device *xe)
> > +{
> > +	struct xe_gt *gt;
> > +	int err;
> > +	u8 id;
> > +
> > +	err = xe_pxp_pm_suspend(xe->pxp);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return err;
> > +
> > +	xe_late_bind_wait_for_worker_completion(&xe->late_bind);
> > +
> > +	xe_irq_disable(xe);
> > +
> > +	for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> > +		xe_gt_flr_prepare(gt);
> > +
> > +	// TODO: Drop all user bos
> > +	xe_bo_pci_dev_remove_pinned(xe);
> > +	unmap_mapping_range(xe->drm.anon_inode->i_mapping, 0, 0, 1);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int xe_flr_done(struct xe_device *xe)
> > +{
> > +	struct xe_tile *tile;
> > +	struct xe_gt *gt;
> > +	int err;
> > +	u8 id;
> > +
> > +	for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> > +		xe_gt_idle_disable_c6(gt);
> > +
> > +	for_each_tile(tile, xe, id)
> > +		xe_wa_apply_tile_workarounds(tile);
> > +
> > +	err = xe_pcode_ready(xe, true);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return err;
> > +
> > +	xe_device_assert_lmem_ready(xe);
> > +
> > +	err = xe_bo_restore_map(xe);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return err;
> > +
> > +	for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> > +		err = xe_gt_flr_done(gt);
> > +		if (err)
> > +			return err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	xe_i2c_pm_resume(xe, true);
> > +
> > +	xe_irq_resume(xe);
> > +
> > +	for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> > +		err = xe_gt_resume(gt);
> > +		if (err)
> > +			return err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	xe_pxp_pm_resume(xe->pxp);
> > +
> > +	xe_late_bind_fw_load(&xe->late_bind);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void xe_pci_reset_prepare(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> > +
> > +	if (XE_FLR_SKIP) {
> > +		xe_err(xe, "PCIe FLR not supported\n");
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (xe_device_wedged(xe)) {
> > +		xe_err(xe, "PCIe FLR aborted, device in unexpected state\n");
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Wedge the device to prevent userspace access but don't send the event yet */
> > +	atomic_set(&xe->wedged.flag, 1);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The hardware could be in corrupted state and access unreliable, but we try to
> > +	 * update data structures and cleanup any pending work to avoid side effects during
> > +	 * PCIe FLR. This will be similar to xe_pm_suspend() flow but without migration.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (xe_flr_prepare(xe)) {
> > +		xe_err(xe, "Failed to prepare for PCIe FLR\n");
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	xe->flr_prepared = true;
> > +	xe_info(xe, "Prepared for PCIe FLR\n");
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void xe_pci_reset_done(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> > +
> > +	if (XE_FLR_SKIP)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (!xe_device_wedged(xe) || !xe->flr_prepared)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	/* Unprepare early in case we fail */
> > +	xe->flr_prepared = false;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We already have the data structures intact, so try to re-initialize the device.
> > +	 * This will be similar to xe_pm_resume() flow, except we'll also need to recreate
> > +	 * all VRAM contents.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (xe_flr_done(xe)) {
> > +		xe_err(xe, "Re-initialization failed\n");
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Unwedge to allow userspace access */
> > +	atomic_set(&xe->wedged.flag, 0);
> > +
> > +	xe_info(xe, "Re-initialization success\n");
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * PCIe Function Level Reset (FLR) support only.
> > + * TODO: Add PCIe error handlers using similar flow.
> > + */
> > +const struct pci_error_handlers xe_pci_err_handlers = {
> > +	.reset_prepare = xe_pci_reset_prepare,
> > +	.reset_done = xe_pci_reset_done,
> > +};

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-15  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-06 14:07 [PATCH v5 0/9] Introduce Xe PCIe FLR Raag Jadav
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] drm/xe/uc_fw: Allow re-initializing firmware Raag Jadav
2026-04-15 16:06   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] drm/xe/guc_submit: Introduce guc_exec_queue_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] drm/xe/gt: Introduce FLR helpers Raag Jadav
2026-04-15 16:25   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] drm/xe/irq: Introduce xe_irq_disable() Raag Jadav
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] drm/xe: Introduce xe_device_assert_lmem_ready() Raag Jadav
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] drm/xe/bo_evict: Introduce xe_bo_restore_map() Raag Jadav
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] drm/xe/exec_queue: Introduce xe_exec_queue_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-04-15 16:10   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-04-15 16:48     ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-04-15 17:02       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] drm/xe/migrate: Introduce xe_migrate_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-04-06 14:07 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] drm/xe/pci: Introduce PCIe FLR Raag Jadav
2026-04-15  8:43   ` Laguna, Lukasz
2026-04-15  9:46     ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2026-04-15 10:33       ` Laguna, Lukasz
2026-04-15 10:54         ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-16  6:40           ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-15 16:45   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-04-06 14:18 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce Xe PCIe FLR (rev5) Patchwork
2026-04-06 14:19 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-04-06 14:54 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-06 18:08 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-10 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] Introduce Xe PCIe FLR Raag Jadav
2026-04-10 18:22   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2026-04-11  8:11     ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-15 15:47 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2026-04-16  6:19   ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-16  6:35     ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ad9eW3OlG6vCxOMs@black.igk.intel.com \
    --to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
    --cc=maarten@lankhorst.se \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox