From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 06/13] drm/xe: ensure correct access_put ordering
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 11:50:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230626105037.43780-21-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230626105037.43780-15-matthew.auld@intel.com>
Only call access_put after dropping the forcewake. In theory the device
could suspend, but really we want to start asserting that we have a
mem_access.ref when touching mmio.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
index 2458397ce8af..2b8a5b29d281 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
@@ -530,8 +530,8 @@ static int gt_reset(struct xe_gt *gt)
if (err)
goto err_out;
- xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
err = xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+ xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
XE_WARN_ON(err);
xe_gt_info(gt, "reset done\n");
@@ -574,8 +574,8 @@ void xe_gt_suspend_prepare(struct xe_gt *gt)
xe_uc_stop_prepare(>->uc);
- xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
XE_WARN_ON(xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL));
+ xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
}
int xe_gt_suspend(struct xe_gt *gt)
@@ -597,8 +597,8 @@ int xe_gt_suspend(struct xe_gt *gt)
if (err)
goto err_force_wake;
- xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
XE_WARN_ON(xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL));
+ xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
xe_gt_info(gt, "suspended\n");
return 0;
@@ -625,8 +625,8 @@ int xe_gt_resume(struct xe_gt *gt)
if (err)
goto err_force_wake;
- xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
XE_WARN_ON(xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL));
+ xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
xe_gt_info(gt, "resumed\n");
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c
index b5a5538ae630..98dd3b2506b1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c
@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ static int hw_engines(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
for_each_hw_engine(hwe, gt, id)
xe_hw_engine_print(hwe, &p);
- xe_device_mem_access_put(xe);
err = xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+ xe_device_mem_access_put(xe);
if (err)
return err;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
index e3722a805837..b2dd82a6681d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
@@ -831,8 +831,8 @@ int xe_guc_pc_start(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
ret = pc_action_setup_gucrc(pc, XE_GUCRC_FIRMWARE_CONTROL);
out:
- xe_device_mem_access_put(pc_to_xe(pc));
XE_WARN_ON(xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL));
+ xe_device_mem_access_put(pc_to_xe(pc));
return ret;
}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-26 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-26 10:50 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 00/13] xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits Matthew Auld
2023-06-26 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 01/13] drm/xe: fix xe_device_mem_access_get() races Matthew Auld
2023-06-30 15:22 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2023-07-04 11:25 ` Matthew Auld
2023-07-04 15:29 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2023-07-04 16:00 ` Matthew Auld
2023-07-11 9:00 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2023-07-11 11:06 ` Matthew Auld
2023-07-11 17:56 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2023-06-26 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 02/13] drm/xe/vm: tidy up xe_runtime_pm usage Matthew Auld
2023-06-26 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 03/13] drm/xe/debugfs: grab mem_access around forcewake Matthew Auld
2023-06-26 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 04/13] drm/xe/guc_pc: add missing mem_access for freq_rpe_show Matthew Auld
2023-06-27 6:53 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2023-06-27 8:20 ` Matthew Auld
2023-06-27 10:14 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2023-06-26 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 05/13] drm/xe/mmio: grab mem_access in xe_mmio_ioctl Matthew Auld
2023-06-26 10:50 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2023-06-26 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 07/13] drm/xe/pci: wrap probe with mem_access Matthew Auld
2023-06-26 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 08/13] drm/xe/display: use mem_access underneath Matthew Auld
2023-06-28 9:51 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2023-06-29 9:19 ` Matthew Auld
2023-06-26 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 09/13] drm/xe/mmio: enforce xe_device_assert_mem_access Matthew Auld
2023-06-26 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 10/13] drm/xe: drop xe_device_mem_access_get() from guc_ct_send Matthew Auld
2023-06-26 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 11/13] drm/xe/ggtt: prime ggtt->lock against FS_RECLAIM Matthew Auld
2023-06-26 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 12/13] drm/xe: drop xe_device_mem_access_get() from invalidation_vma Matthew Auld
2023-06-26 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 13/13] drm/xe: add lockdep annotation for xe_device_mem_access_get() Matthew Auld
2023-06-26 12:55 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits (rev2) Patchwork
2023-06-26 12:56 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-06-26 12:57 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-06-26 13:01 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-06-26 13:01 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-06-26 13:02 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-06-26 13:46 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork
2023-06-30 6:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 00/13] xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-06-30 11:07 ` Matthew Auld
2023-06-30 16:59 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230626105037.43780-21-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox