Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 0/5] Try to handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path
Date: Tue,  4 Jul 2023 14:45:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230704134524.138377-7-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)

In various test cases and workloads that put the system under a heavy load, we
can sometimes see errors with missed TLB invalidations. If we handle the TLB
completions directly from IRQ we can see a big improvement.

-- 
2.41.0


             reply	other threads:[~2023-07-04 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-04 13:45 Matthew Auld [this message]
2023-07-04 13:45 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/xe: hold mem_access.ref for CT fast-path Matthew Auld
2023-07-04 13:45 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/xe/ct: serialise fast_lock during CT disable Matthew Auld
2023-07-04 13:45 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/xe/gt: tweak placement for signalling TLB fences after GT reset Matthew Auld
2023-07-04 13:45 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/xe/tlb: also update seqno_recv during reset Matthew Auld
2023-07-04 13:45 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path Matthew Auld
2023-07-04 13:48 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Try to " Patchwork
2023-07-04 13:49 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-07-04 13:50 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-07-04 13:54 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-07-04 13:54 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-07-04 13:55 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-07-04 14:42 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork
2023-07-04 18:19 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 0/5] " Souza, Jose
2023-07-04 18:42   ` Souza, Jose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230704134524.138377-7-matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox