Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>, donald.robson@imgtec.com
Cc: robdclark@chromium.org, sarah.walker@imgtec.com,
	ketil.johnsen@arm.com, lina@asahilina.net, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, luben.tuikov@amd.com,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, faith.ekstrand@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/sched: Split free_job into own work item
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:13:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230912121357.4cc10dec@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee56b9ee-36c7-5935-c319-c8d1ad412c7c@amd.com>

On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 15:45:49 +0200
Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:

> Am 25.08.23 um 15:36 schrieb Matthew Brost:
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:02:32AM +0200, Christian König wrote:  
> >> Am 25.08.23 um 04:58 schrieb Matthew Brost:  
> >>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:04:10AM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:  
> >>>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 07:31:32PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:  
> >>>>> Rather than call free_job and run_job in same work item have a dedicated
> >>>>> work item for each. This aligns with the design and intended use of work
> >>>>> queues.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> >>>>>    include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h            |   8 +-
> >>>>>    2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> >>>>> index cede47afc800..b67469eac179 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> >>>>> @@ -213,11 +213,12 @@ void drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
> >>>>>     * drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr - Select an entity which could provide a job to run
> >>>>>     *
> >>>>>     * @rq: scheduler run queue to check.
> >>>>> + * @dequeue: dequeue selected entity
> >>>>>     *
> >>>>>     * Try to find a ready entity, returns NULL if none found.
> >>>>>     */
> >>>>>    static struct drm_sched_entity *
> >>>>> -drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
> >>>>> +drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq, bool dequeue)
> >>>>>    {
> >>>>>    	struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
> >>>>> @@ -227,8 +228,10 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
> >>>>>    	if (entity) {
> >>>>>    		list_for_each_entry_continue(entity, &rq->entities, list) {
> >>>>>    			if (drm_sched_entity_is_ready(entity)) {
> >>>>> -				rq->current_entity = entity;
> >>>>> -				reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
> >>>>> +				if (dequeue) {
> >>>>> +					rq->current_entity = entity;
> >>>>> +					reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
> >>>>> +				}
> >>>>>    				spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> >>>>>    				return entity;
> >>>>>    			}
> >>>>> @@ -238,8 +241,10 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
> >>>>>    	list_for_each_entry(entity, &rq->entities, list) {
> >>>>>    		if (drm_sched_entity_is_ready(entity)) {
> >>>>> -			rq->current_entity = entity;
> >>>>> -			reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
> >>>>> +			if (dequeue) {
> >>>>> +				rq->current_entity = entity;
> >>>>> +				reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
> >>>>> +			}
> >>>>>    			spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> >>>>>    			return entity;
> >>>>>    		}
> >>>>> @@ -257,11 +262,12 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
> >>>>>     * drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo - Select an entity which provides a job to run
> >>>>>     *
> >>>>>     * @rq: scheduler run queue to check.
> >>>>> + * @dequeue: dequeue selected entity
> >>>>>     *
> >>>>>     * Find oldest waiting ready entity, returns NULL if none found.
> >>>>>     */
> >>>>>    static struct drm_sched_entity *
> >>>>> -drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
> >>>>> +drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq *rq, bool dequeue)
> >>>>>    {
> >>>>>    	struct rb_node *rb;
> >>>>> @@ -271,8 +277,10 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
> >>>>>    		entity = rb_entry(rb, struct drm_sched_entity, rb_tree_node);
> >>>>>    		if (drm_sched_entity_is_ready(entity)) {
> >>>>> -			rq->current_entity = entity;
> >>>>> -			reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
> >>>>> +			if (dequeue) {
> >>>>> +				rq->current_entity = entity;
> >>>>> +				reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
> >>>>> +			}
> >>>>>    			break;
> >>>>>    		}
> >>>>>    	}
> >>>>> @@ -282,13 +290,54 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
> >>>>>    }
> >>>>>    /**
> >>>>> - * drm_sched_submit_queue - scheduler queue submission
> >>>>> + * drm_sched_run_job_queue - queue job submission
> >>>>>     * @sched: scheduler instance
> >>>>>     */
> >>>>> -static void drm_sched_submit_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >>>>> +static void drm_sched_run_job_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >>>>>    {
> >>>>>    	if (!READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
> >>>>> -		queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_submit);
> >>>>> +		queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_run_job);
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +static struct drm_sched_entity *
> >>>>> +drm_sched_select_entity(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, bool dequeue);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +/**
> >>>>> + * drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready - queue job submission if ready
> >>>>> + * @sched: scheduler instance
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> +static void drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> +	if (drm_sched_select_entity(sched, false))
> >>>>> +		drm_sched_run_job_queue(sched);
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +/**
> >>>>> + * drm_sched_free_job_queue - queue free job
> >>>>> + *
> >>>>> + * @sched: scheduler instance to queue free job
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> +static void drm_sched_free_job_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> +	if (!READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
> >>>>> +		queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_free_job);
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +/**
> >>>>> + * drm_sched_free_job_queue_if_ready - queue free job if ready
> >>>>> + *
> >>>>> + * @sched: scheduler instance to queue free job
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> +static void drm_sched_free_job_queue_if_ready(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> +	struct drm_sched_job *job;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +	spin_lock(&sched->job_list_lock);
> >>>>> +	job = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->pending_list,
> >>>>> +				       struct drm_sched_job, list);
> >>>>> +	if (job && dma_fence_is_signaled(&job->s_fence->finished))
> >>>>> +		drm_sched_free_job_queue(sched);
> >>>>> +	spin_unlock(&sched->job_list_lock);
> >>>>>    }
> >>>>>    /**
> >>>>> @@ -310,7 +359,7 @@ static void drm_sched_job_done(struct drm_sched_job *s_job, int result)
> >>>>>    	dma_fence_get(&s_fence->finished);
> >>>>>    	drm_sched_fence_finished(s_fence, result);
> >>>>>    	dma_fence_put(&s_fence->finished);
> >>>>> -	drm_sched_submit_queue(sched);
> >>>>> +	drm_sched_free_job_queue(sched);
> >>>>>    }
> >>>>>    /**
> >>>>> @@ -906,18 +955,19 @@ static bool drm_sched_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >>>>>    void drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >>>>>    {
> >>>>>    	if (drm_sched_can_queue(sched))
> >>>>> -		drm_sched_submit_queue(sched);
> >>>>> +		drm_sched_run_job_queue(sched);
> >>>>>    }
> >>>>>    /**
> >>>>>     * drm_sched_select_entity - Select next entity to process
> >>>>>     *
> >>>>>     * @sched: scheduler instance
> >>>>> + * @dequeue: dequeue selected entity
> >>>>>     *
> >>>>>     * Returns the entity to process or NULL if none are found.
> >>>>>     */
> >>>>>    static struct drm_sched_entity *
> >>>>> -drm_sched_select_entity(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >>>>> +drm_sched_select_entity(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, bool dequeue)
> >>>>>    {
> >>>>>    	struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
> >>>>>    	int i;
> >>>>> @@ -935,8 +985,10 @@ drm_sched_select_entity(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >>>>>    	/* Kernel run queue has higher priority than normal run queue*/
> >>>>>    	for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_COUNT - 1; i >= DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN; i--) {
> >>>>>    		entity = sched->sched_policy == DRM_SCHED_POLICY_FIFO ?
> >>>>> -			drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(&sched->sched_rq[i]) :
> >>>>> -			drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(&sched->sched_rq[i]);
> >>>>> +			drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(&sched->sched_rq[i],
> >>>>> +							dequeue) :
> >>>>> +			drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(&sched->sched_rq[i],
> >>>>> +						      dequeue);
> >>>>>    		if (entity)
> >>>>>    			break;
> >>>>>    	}
> >>>>> @@ -1024,30 +1076,44 @@ drm_sched_pick_best(struct drm_gpu_scheduler **sched_list,
> >>>>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_pick_best);
> >>>>>    /**
> >>>>> - * drm_sched_main - main scheduler thread
> >>>>> + * drm_sched_free_job_work - worker to call free_job
> >>>>>     *
> >>>>> - * @param: scheduler instance
> >>>>> + * @w: free job work
> >>>>>     */
> >>>>> -static void drm_sched_main(struct work_struct *w)
> >>>>> +static void drm_sched_free_job_work(struct work_struct *w)
> >>>>>    {
> >>>>>    	struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched =
> >>>>> -		container_of(w, struct drm_gpu_scheduler, work_submit);
> >>>>> -	struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
> >>>>> +		container_of(w, struct drm_gpu_scheduler, work_free_job);
> >>>>>    	struct drm_sched_job *cleanup_job;
> >>>>> -	int r;
> >>>>>    	if (READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
> >>>>>    		return;
> >>>>>    	cleanup_job = drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(sched);  
> >>>> I tried this patch with Nouveau and found a race condition:
> >>>>
> >>>> In drm_sched_run_job_work() the job is added to the pending_list via
> >>>> drm_sched_job_begin(), then the run_job() callback is called and the scheduled
> >>>> fence is signaled.
> >>>>
> >>>> However, in parallel drm_sched_get_cleanup_job() might be called from
> >>>> drm_sched_free_job_work(), which picks the first job from the pending_list and
> >>>> for the next job on the pending_list sets the scheduled fence' timestamp field.  
> >> Well why can this happen in parallel? Either the work items are scheduled to
> >> a single threaded work queue or you have protected the pending list with
> >> some locks.
> >>  
> > Xe uses a single-threaded work queue, Nouveau does not (desired
> > behavior).

I'm a bit worried that leaving this single vs multi-threaded wq
decision to drivers is going to cause unnecessary pain, because what
was previously a granted in term of run/cleanup execution order (thanks
to the kthread+static-drm_sched_main-workflow approach) is now subject
to the wq ordering guarantees, which depend on the wq type picked by
the driver.

> >
> > The list of pending jobs is protected by a lock (safe), the race is:
> >
> > add job to pending list
> > run_job
> > signal scheduled fence
> >
> > dequeue from pending list
> > free_job
> > update timestamp
> >
> > Once a job is on the pending list its timestamp can be accessed which
> > can blow up if scheduled fence isn't signaled or more specifically unless
> > DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT is set. 

Ah, so that's the reason for the TIMESTAMP test added in v3. Sorry for
the noise in my v3 review, but I still think it'd be beneficial to have
that change moved to its own commit.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-12 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-11  2:31 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/9] DRM scheduler changes for Xe Matthew Brost
2023-08-11  2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread Matthew Brost
2023-08-16 11:30   ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-16 14:05     ` Christian König
2023-08-16 12:30       ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-16 14:38         ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-16 15:40           ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-16 14:59         ` Christian König
2023-08-16 16:33           ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-17  5:33             ` Christian König
2023-08-17 11:13               ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-17 13:35                 ` Christian König
2023-08-17 12:48                   ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-17 16:17                     ` Christian König
2023-08-18 11:58                       ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-21 14:07                         ` Christian König
2023-08-21 18:01                           ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-21 18:12                             ` Christian König
2023-08-21 19:07                               ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-22  9:35                                 ` Christian König
2023-08-21 19:46                               ` Faith Ekstrand
2023-08-22  9:51                                 ` Christian König
2023-08-22 16:55                                   ` Faith Ekstrand
2023-08-24 11:50                                     ` Bas Nieuwenhuizen
2023-08-18  3:08                 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-18  5:40                   ` Christian König
2023-08-18 12:49                     ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-18 12:06                       ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 14:28                 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:33                   ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 14:49                     ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 15:13                       ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 16:58                         ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 16:52                       ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-11  2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler / entity Matthew Brost
2023-08-11 21:43   ` Maira Canal
2023-08-12  3:20     ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-11  2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy Matthew Brost
2023-08-29 17:37   ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-05 11:10     ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-11 19:44       ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-11  2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/sched: Split free_job into own work item Matthew Brost
2023-08-17 13:39   ` Christian König
2023-08-17 17:54     ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-18  5:27       ` Christian König
2023-08-18 13:13         ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-21 13:17           ` Christian König
2023-08-23  3:27             ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-23  7:10               ` Christian König
2023-08-23 15:24                 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-23 15:41                   ` Alex Deucher
2023-08-23 17:26                     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-08-23 23:12                       ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-24 11:44                         ` Christian König
2023-08-24 14:30                           ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-24 23:04   ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-25  2:58     ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-25  8:02       ` Christian König
2023-08-25 13:36         ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-25 13:45           ` Christian König
2023-09-12 10:13             ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2023-09-12 10:46               ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 12:18                 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 12:56                   ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 13:52                     ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:10                       ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 13:27             ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 13:34               ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 13:53                 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-08-28 18:04   ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-28 18:41     ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-29  1:20       ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-11  2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/sched: Add generic scheduler message interface Matthew Brost
2023-08-11  2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/sched: Add drm_sched_start_timeout_unlocked helper Matthew Brost
2023-08-11  2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/sched: Start run wq before TDR in drm_sched_start Matthew Brost
2023-08-11  2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/sched: Submit job before starting TDR Matthew Brost
2023-08-11  2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/sched: Add helper to set TDR timeout Matthew Brost
2023-08-11  2:34 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for DRM scheduler changes for Xe (rev2) Patchwork
2023-08-24  0:08 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/9] DRM scheduler changes for Xe Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-24  3:23   ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-24 14:51     ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-25  3:01 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for DRM scheduler changes for Xe (rev3) Patchwork
2023-09-05 11:13 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for DRM scheduler changes for Xe (rev4) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230912121357.4cc10dec@collabora.com \
    --to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dakr@redhat.com \
    --cc=donald.robson@imgtec.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=faith.ekstrand@collabora.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ketil.johnsen@arm.com \
    --cc=lina@asahilina.net \
    --cc=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
    --cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=sarah.walker@imgtec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox