From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: robdclark@chromium.org, sarah.walker@imgtec.com,
ketil.johnsen@arm.com, lina@asahilina.net, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, luben.tuikov@amd.com,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>,
donald.robson@imgtec.com, boris.brezillon@collabora.com,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, faith.ekstrand@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/sched: Split free_job into own work item
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 15:45:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee56b9ee-36c7-5935-c319-c8d1ad412c7c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZOiuWcFDImBvJtnO@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com>
Am 25.08.23 um 15:36 schrieb Matthew Brost:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:02:32AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 25.08.23 um 04:58 schrieb Matthew Brost:
>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:04:10AM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 07:31:32PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
>>>>> Rather than call free_job and run_job in same work item have a dedicated
>>>>> work item for each. This aligns with the design and intended use of work
>>>>> queues.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>>> include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 8 +-
>>>>> 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>>> index cede47afc800..b67469eac179 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>>> @@ -213,11 +213,12 @@ void drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
>>>>> * drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr - Select an entity which could provide a job to run
>>>>> *
>>>>> * @rq: scheduler run queue to check.
>>>>> + * @dequeue: dequeue selected entity
>>>>> *
>>>>> * Try to find a ready entity, returns NULL if none found.
>>>>> */
>>>>> static struct drm_sched_entity *
>>>>> -drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
>>>>> +drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq, bool dequeue)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
>>>>> @@ -227,8 +228,10 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
>>>>> if (entity) {
>>>>> list_for_each_entry_continue(entity, &rq->entities, list) {
>>>>> if (drm_sched_entity_is_ready(entity)) {
>>>>> - rq->current_entity = entity;
>>>>> - reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>>>> + if (dequeue) {
>>>>> + rq->current_entity = entity;
>>>>> + reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
>>>>> return entity;
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -238,8 +241,10 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
>>>>> list_for_each_entry(entity, &rq->entities, list) {
>>>>> if (drm_sched_entity_is_ready(entity)) {
>>>>> - rq->current_entity = entity;
>>>>> - reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>>>> + if (dequeue) {
>>>>> + rq->current_entity = entity;
>>>>> + reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
>>>>> return entity;
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -257,11 +262,12 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
>>>>> * drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo - Select an entity which provides a job to run
>>>>> *
>>>>> * @rq: scheduler run queue to check.
>>>>> + * @dequeue: dequeue selected entity
>>>>> *
>>>>> * Find oldest waiting ready entity, returns NULL if none found.
>>>>> */
>>>>> static struct drm_sched_entity *
>>>>> -drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
>>>>> +drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq *rq, bool dequeue)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct rb_node *rb;
>>>>> @@ -271,8 +277,10 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
>>>>> entity = rb_entry(rb, struct drm_sched_entity, rb_tree_node);
>>>>> if (drm_sched_entity_is_ready(entity)) {
>>>>> - rq->current_entity = entity;
>>>>> - reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>>>> + if (dequeue) {
>>>>> + rq->current_entity = entity;
>>>>> + reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> break;
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -282,13 +290,54 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
>>>>> }
>>>>> /**
>>>>> - * drm_sched_submit_queue - scheduler queue submission
>>>>> + * drm_sched_run_job_queue - queue job submission
>>>>> * @sched: scheduler instance
>>>>> */
>>>>> -static void drm_sched_submit_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>>>> +static void drm_sched_run_job_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>>>> {
>>>>> if (!READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
>>>>> - queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_submit);
>>>>> + queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_run_job);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static struct drm_sched_entity *
>>>>> +drm_sched_select_entity(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, bool dequeue);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready - queue job submission if ready
>>>>> + * @sched: scheduler instance
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static void drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + if (drm_sched_select_entity(sched, false))
>>>>> + drm_sched_run_job_queue(sched);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * drm_sched_free_job_queue - queue free job
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * @sched: scheduler instance to queue free job
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static void drm_sched_free_job_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + if (!READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
>>>>> + queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_free_job);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * drm_sched_free_job_queue_if_ready - queue free job if ready
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * @sched: scheduler instance to queue free job
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static void drm_sched_free_job_queue_if_ready(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct drm_sched_job *job;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + spin_lock(&sched->job_list_lock);
>>>>> + job = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->pending_list,
>>>>> + struct drm_sched_job, list);
>>>>> + if (job && dma_fence_is_signaled(&job->s_fence->finished))
>>>>> + drm_sched_free_job_queue(sched);
>>>>> + spin_unlock(&sched->job_list_lock);
>>>>> }
>>>>> /**
>>>>> @@ -310,7 +359,7 @@ static void drm_sched_job_done(struct drm_sched_job *s_job, int result)
>>>>> dma_fence_get(&s_fence->finished);
>>>>> drm_sched_fence_finished(s_fence, result);
>>>>> dma_fence_put(&s_fence->finished);
>>>>> - drm_sched_submit_queue(sched);
>>>>> + drm_sched_free_job_queue(sched);
>>>>> }
>>>>> /**
>>>>> @@ -906,18 +955,19 @@ static bool drm_sched_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>>>> void drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>>>> {
>>>>> if (drm_sched_can_queue(sched))
>>>>> - drm_sched_submit_queue(sched);
>>>>> + drm_sched_run_job_queue(sched);
>>>>> }
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * drm_sched_select_entity - Select next entity to process
>>>>> *
>>>>> * @sched: scheduler instance
>>>>> + * @dequeue: dequeue selected entity
>>>>> *
>>>>> * Returns the entity to process or NULL if none are found.
>>>>> */
>>>>> static struct drm_sched_entity *
>>>>> -drm_sched_select_entity(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>>>> +drm_sched_select_entity(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, bool dequeue)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
>>>>> int i;
>>>>> @@ -935,8 +985,10 @@ drm_sched_select_entity(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>>>> /* Kernel run queue has higher priority than normal run queue*/
>>>>> for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_COUNT - 1; i >= DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN; i--) {
>>>>> entity = sched->sched_policy == DRM_SCHED_POLICY_FIFO ?
>>>>> - drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(&sched->sched_rq[i]) :
>>>>> - drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(&sched->sched_rq[i]);
>>>>> + drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(&sched->sched_rq[i],
>>>>> + dequeue) :
>>>>> + drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(&sched->sched_rq[i],
>>>>> + dequeue);
>>>>> if (entity)
>>>>> break;
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -1024,30 +1076,44 @@ drm_sched_pick_best(struct drm_gpu_scheduler **sched_list,
>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_pick_best);
>>>>> /**
>>>>> - * drm_sched_main - main scheduler thread
>>>>> + * drm_sched_free_job_work - worker to call free_job
>>>>> *
>>>>> - * @param: scheduler instance
>>>>> + * @w: free job work
>>>>> */
>>>>> -static void drm_sched_main(struct work_struct *w)
>>>>> +static void drm_sched_free_job_work(struct work_struct *w)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched =
>>>>> - container_of(w, struct drm_gpu_scheduler, work_submit);
>>>>> - struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
>>>>> + container_of(w, struct drm_gpu_scheduler, work_free_job);
>>>>> struct drm_sched_job *cleanup_job;
>>>>> - int r;
>>>>> if (READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
>>>>> return;
>>>>> cleanup_job = drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(sched);
>>>> I tried this patch with Nouveau and found a race condition:
>>>>
>>>> In drm_sched_run_job_work() the job is added to the pending_list via
>>>> drm_sched_job_begin(), then the run_job() callback is called and the scheduled
>>>> fence is signaled.
>>>>
>>>> However, in parallel drm_sched_get_cleanup_job() might be called from
>>>> drm_sched_free_job_work(), which picks the first job from the pending_list and
>>>> for the next job on the pending_list sets the scheduled fence' timestamp field.
>> Well why can this happen in parallel? Either the work items are scheduled to
>> a single threaded work queue or you have protected the pending list with
>> some locks.
>>
> Xe uses a single-threaded work queue, Nouveau does not (desired
> behavior).
>
> The list of pending jobs is protected by a lock (safe), the race is:
>
> add job to pending list
> run_job
> signal scheduled fence
>
> dequeue from pending list
> free_job
> update timestamp
>
> Once a job is on the pending list its timestamp can be accessed which
> can blow up if scheduled fence isn't signaled or more specifically unless
> DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT is set.
Ah, that problem again. No that is actually quite harmless.
You just need to double check if the DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT is
already set and if it's not set don't do anything.
Regards,
Christian.
> Logically it makes sense for the
> job to be in the pending list before run_job and signal the scheduled
> fence after run_job so I think we need to live with this race.
>
>> Just moving the free_job into a separate work item without such precautions
>> won't work because of quite a bunch of other reasons as well.
>>
> Yes, free_job might not be safe to run in parallel with run_job
> depending on the driver vfuncs. Mention this in the cover letter.
>
> Certainly this should be safe in the scheduler code though and I think
> it will be after fixing this.
>
> Matt
>
>>>> The job can be on the pending_list, but the scheduled fence might not yet be
>>>> signaled. The call to actually signal the fence will subsequently fault because
>>>> it will try to dereference the timestamp.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what's the best way to fix this, maybe it's enough to re-order
>>>> signalling the scheduled fence and adding the job to the pending_list. Not sure
>>>> if this has other implications though.
>>>>
>>> We really want the job on the pending list before calling run_job.
>>>
>>> I'm thinking we just delete the updating of the timestamp, not sure why
>>> this is useful.
>> This is used for calculating how long each job has spend on the hw, so big
>> NAK to deleting this.
>>
> Ah, I see that AMDGPU uses this. Previously just checked the scheduler
> code.
>
> The below patch should work just fine then.
>
> Matt
>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> Or we could do something like this where we try to update the timestamp,
>>> if we can't update the timestamp run_job worker will do it anyways.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> index 67e0fb6e7d18..54bd3e88f139 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> @@ -1074,8 +1074,10 @@ drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>> typeof(*next), list);
>>>
>>> if (next) {
>>> - next->s_fence->scheduled.timestamp =
>>> - job->s_fence->finished.timestamp;
>>> + if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT,
>>> + &next->s_fence->scheduled.flags))
>>> + next->s_fence->scheduled.timestamp =
>>> + job->s_fence->finished.timestamp;
>>> /* start TO timer for next job */
>>> drm_sched_start_timeout(sched);
>>> }
>>>
>>> I guess I'm leaning towards the latter option.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>> - Danilo
>>>>
>>>>> - entity = drm_sched_select_entity(sched);
>>>>> + if (cleanup_job) {
>>>>> + sched->ops->free_job(cleanup_job);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + drm_sched_free_job_queue_if_ready(sched);
>>>>> + drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready(sched);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +}
>>>>> - if (!entity && !cleanup_job)
>>>>> - return; /* No more work */
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * drm_sched_run_job_work - worker to call run_job
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * @w: run job work
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static void drm_sched_run_job_work(struct work_struct *w)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched =
>>>>> + container_of(w, struct drm_gpu_scheduler, work_run_job);
>>>>> + struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
>>>>> + int r;
>>>>> - if (cleanup_job)
>>>>> - sched->ops->free_job(cleanup_job);
>>>>> + if (READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
>>>>> + return;
>>>>> + entity = drm_sched_select_entity(sched, true);
>>>>> if (entity) {
>>>>> struct dma_fence *fence;
>>>>> struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence;
>>>>> @@ -1056,9 +1122,7 @@ static void drm_sched_main(struct work_struct *w)
>>>>> sched_job = drm_sched_entity_pop_job(entity);
>>>>> if (!sched_job) {
>>>>> complete_all(&entity->entity_idle);
>>>>> - if (!cleanup_job)
>>>>> - return; /* No more work */
>>>>> - goto again;
>>>>> + return; /* No more work */
>>>>> }
>>>>> s_fence = sched_job->s_fence;
>>>>> @@ -1088,10 +1152,8 @@ static void drm_sched_main(struct work_struct *w)
>>>>> }
>>>>> wake_up(&sched->job_scheduled);
>>>>> + drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready(sched);
>>>>> }
>>>>> -
>>>>> -again:
>>>>> - drm_sched_submit_queue(sched);
>>>>> }
>>>>> /**
>>>>> @@ -1150,7 +1212,8 @@ int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>>>> spin_lock_init(&sched->job_list_lock);
>>>>> atomic_set(&sched->hw_rq_count, 0);
>>>>> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sched->work_tdr, drm_sched_job_timedout);
>>>>> - INIT_WORK(&sched->work_submit, drm_sched_main);
>>>>> + INIT_WORK(&sched->work_run_job, drm_sched_run_job_work);
>>>>> + INIT_WORK(&sched->work_free_job, drm_sched_free_job_work);
>>>>> atomic_set(&sched->_score, 0);
>>>>> atomic64_set(&sched->job_id_count, 0);
>>>>> sched->pause_submit = false;
>>>>> @@ -1275,7 +1338,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_submit_ready);
>>>>> void drm_sched_submit_stop(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>>>> {
>>>>> WRITE_ONCE(sched->pause_submit, true);
>>>>> - cancel_work_sync(&sched->work_submit);
>>>>> + cancel_work_sync(&sched->work_run_job);
>>>>> + cancel_work_sync(&sched->work_free_job);
>>>>> }
>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_submit_stop);
>>>>> @@ -1287,6 +1351,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_submit_stop);
>>>>> void drm_sched_submit_start(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>>>> {
>>>>> WRITE_ONCE(sched->pause_submit, false);
>>>>> - queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_submit);
>>>>> + queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_run_job);
>>>>> + queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_free_job);
>>>>> }
>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_submit_start);
>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>>>> index 04eec2d7635f..fbc083a92757 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>>>> @@ -487,9 +487,10 @@ struct drm_sched_backend_ops {
>>>>> * finished.
>>>>> * @hw_rq_count: the number of jobs currently in the hardware queue.
>>>>> * @job_id_count: used to assign unique id to the each job.
>>>>> - * @submit_wq: workqueue used to queue @work_submit
>>>>> + * @submit_wq: workqueue used to queue @work_run_job and @work_free_job
>>>>> * @timeout_wq: workqueue used to queue @work_tdr
>>>>> - * @work_submit: schedules jobs and cleans up entities
>>>>> + * @work_run_job: schedules jobs
>>>>> + * @work_free_job: cleans up jobs
>>>>> * @work_tdr: schedules a delayed call to @drm_sched_job_timedout after the
>>>>> * timeout interval is over.
>>>>> * @pending_list: the list of jobs which are currently in the job queue.
>>>>> @@ -518,7 +519,8 @@ struct drm_gpu_scheduler {
>>>>> atomic64_t job_id_count;
>>>>> struct workqueue_struct *submit_wq;
>>>>> struct workqueue_struct *timeout_wq;
>>>>> - struct work_struct work_submit;
>>>>> + struct work_struct work_run_job;
>>>>> + struct work_struct work_free_job;
>>>>> struct delayed_work work_tdr;
>>>>> struct list_head pending_list;
>>>>> spinlock_t job_list_lock;
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-25 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-11 2:31 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/9] DRM scheduler changes for Xe Matthew Brost
2023-08-11 2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread Matthew Brost
2023-08-16 11:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-16 14:05 ` Christian König
2023-08-16 12:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-16 14:38 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-16 15:40 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-16 14:59 ` Christian König
2023-08-16 16:33 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-17 5:33 ` Christian König
2023-08-17 11:13 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-17 13:35 ` Christian König
2023-08-17 12:48 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-17 16:17 ` Christian König
2023-08-18 11:58 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-21 14:07 ` Christian König
2023-08-21 18:01 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-21 18:12 ` Christian König
2023-08-21 19:07 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-22 9:35 ` Christian König
2023-08-21 19:46 ` Faith Ekstrand
2023-08-22 9:51 ` Christian König
2023-08-22 16:55 ` Faith Ekstrand
2023-08-24 11:50 ` Bas Nieuwenhuizen
2023-08-18 3:08 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-18 5:40 ` Christian König
2023-08-18 12:49 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-18 12:06 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 14:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:33 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 14:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 15:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 16:58 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 16:52 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-11 2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler / entity Matthew Brost
2023-08-11 21:43 ` Maira Canal
2023-08-12 3:20 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-11 2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy Matthew Brost
2023-08-29 17:37 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-05 11:10 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-11 19:44 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-11 2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/sched: Split free_job into own work item Matthew Brost
2023-08-17 13:39 ` Christian König
2023-08-17 17:54 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-18 5:27 ` Christian König
2023-08-18 13:13 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-21 13:17 ` Christian König
2023-08-23 3:27 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-23 7:10 ` Christian König
2023-08-23 15:24 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-23 15:41 ` Alex Deucher
2023-08-23 17:26 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-08-23 23:12 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-24 11:44 ` Christian König
2023-08-24 14:30 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-24 23:04 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-25 2:58 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-25 8:02 ` Christian König
2023-08-25 13:36 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-25 13:45 ` Christian König [this message]
2023-09-12 10:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 10:46 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 12:18 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 12:56 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 13:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:10 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 13:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 13:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 13:53 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-08-28 18:04 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-28 18:41 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-29 1:20 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-11 2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/sched: Add generic scheduler message interface Matthew Brost
2023-08-11 2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/sched: Add drm_sched_start_timeout_unlocked helper Matthew Brost
2023-08-11 2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/sched: Start run wq before TDR in drm_sched_start Matthew Brost
2023-08-11 2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/sched: Submit job before starting TDR Matthew Brost
2023-08-11 2:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/sched: Add helper to set TDR timeout Matthew Brost
2023-08-11 2:34 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for DRM scheduler changes for Xe (rev2) Patchwork
2023-08-24 0:08 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/9] DRM scheduler changes for Xe Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-24 3:23 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-24 14:51 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-08-25 3:01 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for DRM scheduler changes for Xe (rev3) Patchwork
2023-09-05 11:13 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for DRM scheduler changes for Xe (rev4) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee56b9ee-36c7-5935-c319-c8d1ad412c7c@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=donald.robson@imgtec.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=faith.ekstrand@collabora.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ketil.johnsen@arm.com \
--cc=lina@asahilina.net \
--cc=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=sarah.walker@imgtec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox