From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/xe: Fix xe_exec_queue_is_idle for parallel exec queues
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 16:34:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230915233445.2241554-2-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230915233445.2241554-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Last little piece to support parallel exec queue is compute mode.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
index 6725157d8c1d..eee64ba87d50 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
@@ -867,8 +867,17 @@ bool xe_exec_queue_ring_full(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
*/
bool xe_exec_queue_is_idle(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
{
- if (XE_WARN_ON(xe_exec_queue_is_parallel(q)))
- return false;
+ if (xe_exec_queue_is_parallel(q)) {
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < q->width; ++i) {
+ if (xe_lrc_seqno(&q->lrc[i]) !=
+ q->lrc[i].fence_ctx.next_seqno - 1)
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+ }
return xe_lrc_seqno(&q->lrc[0]) ==
q->lrc[0].fence_ctx.next_seqno - 1;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-15 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-15 23:34 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/4] Remove XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_COMPUTE_MODE Matthew Brost
2023-09-15 23:34 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2023-09-18 4:54 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/xe: Fix xe_exec_queue_is_idle for parallel exec queues Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2023-09-15 23:34 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/xe: Deprecate XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_COMPUTE_MODE implementation Matthew Brost
2023-09-18 4:53 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2023-09-15 23:34 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/xe: Rename exec_queue_kill_compute to xe_vm_remove_compute_exec_queue Matthew Brost
2023-09-18 4:53 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2023-09-18 15:34 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-15 23:34 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/xe: Remove XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_COMPUTE_MODE from uAPI Matthew Brost
2023-09-16 3:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Remove XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_COMPUTE_MODE (rev2) Patchwork
2023-09-16 3:11 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2023-09-16 3:12 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-09-16 3:19 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-09-16 3:19 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-16 3:21 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2023-09-16 3:59 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-19 13:14 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/4] Remove XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_COMPUTE_MODE Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-19 13:35 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-19 14:57 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230915233445.2241554-2-matthew.brost@intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox