From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 3/6] drm/xe: Allow num_binds == 0 in VM bind IOCTL
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 14:21:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231206222141.398040-4-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231206222141.398040-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
The idea being out-syncs can signal indicating all previous operations
on the bind queue are complete. An example use case of this would be
support for implementing vkQueueWaitIdle easily.
v2: s/vkQueueWaitForIdle/vkQueueWaitIdle
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c | 4 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c
index 2a3f508722fc..d0f118223fa2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ int xe_sync_entry_parse(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef,
int err;
bool exec = flags & SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_EXEC;
bool in_lr_mode = flags & SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_LR_MODE;
+ bool disallow_user_fence = flags & SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_DISALLOW_USER_FENCE;
bool signal;
if (copy_from_user(&sync_in, sync_user, sizeof(*sync_user)))
@@ -164,6 +165,9 @@ int xe_sync_entry_parse(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef,
break;
case DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE:
+ if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, disallow_user_fence))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, !signal))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.h
index 1b748cec4678..45f4371e94b9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct xe_sched_job;
#define SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_EXEC BIT(0)
#define SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_LR_MODE BIT(1)
+#define SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_DISALLOW_USER_FENCE BIT(2)
int xe_sync_entry_parse(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef,
struct xe_sync_entry *sync,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
index 42077e3db36a..f6de0584ea91 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
@@ -2834,7 +2834,6 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_check_args(struct xe_device *xe,
return -EINVAL;
if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, args->extensions) ||
- XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, !args->num_binds) ||
XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, args->num_binds > MAX_BINDS))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -2987,7 +2986,7 @@ int xe_vm_bind_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
goto put_exec_queue;
}
- if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, async !=
+ if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, args->num_binds && async !=
!!(q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_VM_ASYNC))) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto put_exec_queue;
@@ -3001,7 +3000,7 @@ int xe_vm_bind_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
}
if (!args->exec_queue_id) {
- if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, async !=
+ if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, args->num_binds && async !=
!!(vm->flags & XE_VM_FLAG_ASYNC_DEFAULT))) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto put_vm;
@@ -3028,16 +3027,18 @@ int xe_vm_bind_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
}
}
- bos = kzalloc(sizeof(*bos) * args->num_binds, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!bos) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
- goto release_vm_lock;
- }
+ if (args->num_binds) {
+ bos = kcalloc(args->num_binds, sizeof(*bos), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!bos) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto release_vm_lock;
+ }
- ops = kzalloc(sizeof(*ops) * args->num_binds, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!ops) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
- goto release_vm_lock;
+ ops = kcalloc(args->num_binds, sizeof(*ops), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ops) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto release_vm_lock;
+ }
}
for (i = 0; i < args->num_binds; ++i) {
@@ -3107,12 +3108,19 @@ int xe_vm_bind_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
for (num_syncs = 0; num_syncs < args->num_syncs; num_syncs++) {
err = xe_sync_entry_parse(xe, xef, &syncs[num_syncs],
&syncs_user[num_syncs],
- xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm) ?
- SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_LR_MODE : 0);
+ (xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm) ?
+ SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_LR_MODE : 0) |
+ (!args->num_binds ?
+ SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_DISALLOW_USER_FENCE : 0));
if (err)
goto free_syncs;
}
+ if (!args->num_binds) {
+ err = -ENODATA;
+ goto free_syncs;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < args->num_binds; ++i) {
u64 range = bind_ops[i].range;
u64 addr = bind_ops[i].addr;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-06 22:21 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 0/6] Allow num_binds/num_batch_buffer to be zero IOCTLs Matthew Brost
2023-12-06 22:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 1/6] drm/xe: Use a flags field instead of bools for VMA create Matthew Brost
2023-12-06 22:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 2/6] drm/xe: Use a flags field instead of bools for sync parse Matthew Brost
2023-12-06 22:21 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2023-12-06 22:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 4/6] drm/xe: Allow num_batch_buffer == 0 in exec IOCTL Matthew Brost
2023-12-06 22:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/xe: Take in-syncs into account when num_execs or num_binds == 0 Matthew Brost
2023-12-06 22:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/xe: Add last fence as dependency for jobs on user exec queues Matthew Brost
2023-12-08 12:31 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-12-08 12:42 ` Matthew Brost
2023-12-07 6:13 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Allow num_binds/num_batch_buffer to be zero IOCTLs (rev5) Patchwork
2023-12-07 6:13 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2023-12-07 6:14 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-12-07 6:22 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-12-07 6:22 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-12-07 6:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-12-07 6:59 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231206222141.398040-4-matthew.brost@intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox