From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 4/6] drm/xe: Allow num_batch_buffer == 0 in exec IOCTL
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 14:21:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231206222141.398040-5-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231206222141.398040-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
The idea being out-syncs can signal indicating all previous operations
on the exec queue are complete. An example use case of this would be
support for implementing vkQueueWaitIdle easily.
v2: Don't add last_fence for VM's that do not support dma fences
v3: Use a flags field instead of severval bools in sync parse (Thomas)
v4: s/vkQueueWaitForIdle/vkQueueWaitIdle
v5: Fix inverted lr_mode checks
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 5 ++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 5 +++--
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
index a8a025495b14..96d7506a4c72 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
@@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_VM))
return -EINVAL;
- if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, q->width != args->num_batch_buffer))
+ if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, args->num_batch_buffer &&
+ q->width != args->num_batch_buffer))
return -EINVAL;
if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_BANNED)) {
@@ -235,6 +236,18 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
goto err_exec;
}
+ if (!args->num_batch_buffer) {
+ if (!xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm)) {
+ struct dma_fence *fence =
+ xe_exec_queue_last_fence_get(q, vm);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_syncs; i++)
+ xe_sync_entry_signal(&syncs[i], NULL, fence);
+ }
+
+ goto err_exec;
+ }
+
if (xe_exec_queue_is_lr(q) && xe_exec_queue_ring_full(q)) {
err = -EWOULDBLOCK;
goto err_exec;
@@ -328,6 +341,8 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
if (xe_exec_queue_is_lr(q))
q->ring_ops->emit_job(job);
+ if (!xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm))
+ xe_exec_queue_last_fence_set(q, vm, &job->drm.s_fence->finished);
xe_sched_job_push(job);
xe_vm_reactivate_rebind(vm);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
index cb284c4ad049..67e3fd9dfc5f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
@@ -886,7 +886,10 @@ int xe_exec_queue_destroy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
static void xe_exec_queue_last_fence_lockdep_assert(struct xe_exec_queue *q,
struct xe_vm *vm)
{
- lockdep_assert_held_write(&vm->lock);
+ if (q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_VM)
+ lockdep_assert_held_write(&vm->lock);
+ else
+ xe_vm_assert_held(vm);
}
/**
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
index 5ba47a5cfdbd..52f0927d0d9b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
@@ -56,8 +56,9 @@ struct xe_exec_queue {
struct xe_hw_fence_irq *fence_irq;
/**
- * @last_fence: last fence on engine, protected by vm->lock in write
- * mode if bind engine
+ * @last_fence: last fence on exec queue, protected by vm->lock in write
+ * mode if bind exec queue, protected by dma resv lock if non-bind exec
+ * queue
*/
struct dma_fence *last_fence;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-06 22:21 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 0/6] Allow num_binds/num_batch_buffer to be zero IOCTLs Matthew Brost
2023-12-06 22:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 1/6] drm/xe: Use a flags field instead of bools for VMA create Matthew Brost
2023-12-06 22:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 2/6] drm/xe: Use a flags field instead of bools for sync parse Matthew Brost
2023-12-06 22:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 3/6] drm/xe: Allow num_binds == 0 in VM bind IOCTL Matthew Brost
2023-12-06 22:21 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2023-12-06 22:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/xe: Take in-syncs into account when num_execs or num_binds == 0 Matthew Brost
2023-12-06 22:21 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/xe: Add last fence as dependency for jobs on user exec queues Matthew Brost
2023-12-08 12:31 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-12-08 12:42 ` Matthew Brost
2023-12-07 6:13 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Allow num_binds/num_batch_buffer to be zero IOCTLs (rev5) Patchwork
2023-12-07 6:13 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2023-12-07 6:14 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-12-07 6:22 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-12-07 6:22 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-12-07 6:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-12-07 6:59 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231206222141.398040-5-matthew.brost@intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox