Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/11] drm/xe: Introduce intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume at compat-i915-headers for display
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:22:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240311192303.33961-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240311192303.33961-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

The i915-display will start using the intel_runtime_pm_noresume.
So we need to add the compat header before it.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
index fef969112b1d..84fda436faab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
@@ -176,6 +176,13 @@ static inline intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use(struct xe_runtime_p
 	return xe_pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(xe);
 }
 
+static inline intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(struct xe_runtime_pm *pm)
+{
+	struct xe_device *xe = container_of(pm, struct xe_device, runtime_pm);
+	xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
+	return true;
+}
+
 static inline void intel_runtime_pm_put_unchecked(struct xe_runtime_pm *pm)
 {
 	struct xe_device *xe = container_of(pm, struct xe_device, runtime_pm);
-- 
2.44.0


       reply	other threads:[~2024-03-11 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240311192303.33961-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2024-03-11 19:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-03-11 19:32   ` [PATCH] drm/xe: Introduce intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume at compat-i915-headers for display Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:22 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/display: convert inner wakeref get towards get_if_in_use Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:22 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/xe: Move lockdep protection from mem_access to xe_pm_runtime Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:22 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/xe: Convert GSC HDCP from mem_access to direct xe_pm_runtime calls Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:22 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/xe: Remove useless mem_access during probe Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:22 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/xe: Convert xe_gem_fault to use direct xe_pm_runtime calls Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:23 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/xe: Removing extra mem_access protection from runtime pm Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:23 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/xe: Convert mem_access_if_ongoing to direct xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:23 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/xe: Ensure all the inner access are using the _noresume variant Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:23 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/xe: Kill xe_device_mem_access_{get*,put} Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:28 ` [PATCH] drm/xe: Introduce xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume for inner callers Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 20:33 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Introduce xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume for inner callers (rev2) Patchwork
2024-03-11 20:34 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 20:35 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 20:45 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 20:48 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 20:49 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-03-11 21:16 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-03-14 14:10 [PATCH 01/11] drm/xe: Introduce xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume for inner callers Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-14 14:10 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/xe: Introduce intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume at compat-i915-headers for display Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-14 18:04   ` Francois Dugast
2024-03-19 15:42     ` Rodrigo Vivi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240311192303.33961-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox