From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/11] drm/xe: Remove useless mem_access during probe
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:22:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240311192303.33961-6-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240311192303.33961-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
xe_pm_init is the very last thing during the xe_pci_probe(),
hence these protections are useless from the point of view
of ensuring that the device is awake.
Let's remove it so we continue towards the goal of killing
xe_device_mem_access.
v2: Adding more cases
v3: Provide a separate fix for xe_tile_init_noalloc return (Matt)
Adding a new case where display HDCP init calls which
are also called at display probe time.
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c | 2 --
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c | 2 --
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 9 ---------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile.c | 15 +++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c | 11 -----------
5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c
index a221f0cf4bac..b2bd56a9b76d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c
@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ static int intel_hdcp_gsc_initialize_message(struct xe_device *xe,
int ret = 0;
/* allocate object of two page for HDCP command memory and store it */
- xe_device_mem_access_get(xe);
bo = xe_bo_create_pin_map(xe, xe_device_get_root_tile(xe), NULL, PAGE_SIZE * 2,
ttm_bo_type_kernel,
XE_BO_CREATE_SYSTEM_BIT |
@@ -90,7 +89,6 @@ static int intel_hdcp_gsc_initialize_message(struct xe_device *xe,
hdcp_message->hdcp_cmd_in = cmd_in;
hdcp_message->hdcp_cmd_out = cmd_out;
out:
- xe_device_mem_access_put(xe);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
index 325337c38961..0f96b7db6dcc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
@@ -206,14 +206,12 @@ static void xe_ggtt_initial_clear(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
u64 start, end;
/* Display may have allocated inside ggtt, so be careful with clearing here */
- xe_device_mem_access_get(tile_to_xe(ggtt->tile));
mutex_lock(&ggtt->lock);
drm_mm_for_each_hole(hole, &ggtt->mm, start, end)
xe_ggtt_clear(ggtt, start, end - start);
xe_ggtt_invalidate(ggtt);
mutex_unlock(&ggtt->lock);
- xe_device_mem_access_put(tile_to_xe(ggtt->tile));
}
int xe_ggtt_init(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
index 85408e7a932b..063b710a8c7b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
@@ -347,7 +347,6 @@ static int gt_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
{
int err, i;
- xe_device_mem_access_get(gt_to_xe(gt));
err = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
if (err)
goto err_hw_fence_irq;
@@ -389,7 +388,6 @@ static int gt_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
err = xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
XE_WARN_ON(err);
- xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
return 0;
@@ -399,7 +397,6 @@ static int gt_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
err_hw_fence_irq:
for (i = 0; i < XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX; ++i)
xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(>->fence_irq[i]);
- xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
return err;
}
@@ -408,7 +405,6 @@ static int all_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
{
int err, i;
- xe_device_mem_access_get(gt_to_xe(gt));
err = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
if (err)
goto err_hw_fence_irq;
@@ -474,7 +470,6 @@ static int all_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
err = xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
XE_WARN_ON(err);
- xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
return 0;
@@ -483,7 +478,6 @@ static int all_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
err_hw_fence_irq:
for (i = 0; i < XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX; ++i)
xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(>->fence_irq[i]);
- xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
return err;
}
@@ -496,7 +490,6 @@ int xe_gt_init_hwconfig(struct xe_gt *gt)
{
int err;
- xe_device_mem_access_get(gt_to_xe(gt));
err = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
if (err)
goto out;
@@ -519,8 +512,6 @@ int xe_gt_init_hwconfig(struct xe_gt *gt)
out_fw:
xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
out:
- xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
-
return err;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile.c
index 0650b2fa75ef..74ecb5f39438 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile.c
@@ -160,24 +160,19 @@ int xe_tile_init_noalloc(struct xe_tile *tile)
{
int err;
- xe_device_mem_access_get(tile_to_xe(tile));
-
err = tile_ttm_mgr_init(tile);
if (err)
- goto err_mem_access;
+ return err;
tile->mem.kernel_bb_pool = xe_sa_bo_manager_init(tile, SZ_1M, 16);
- if (IS_ERR(tile->mem.kernel_bb_pool)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(tile->mem.kernel_bb_pool);
- goto err_mem_access;
- }
+ if (IS_ERR(tile->mem.kernel_bb_pool))
+ return PTR_ERR(tile->mem.kernel_bb_pool);
+
xe_wa_apply_tile_workarounds(tile);
xe_tile_sysfs_init(tile);
-err_mem_access:
- xe_device_mem_access_put(tile_to_xe(tile));
- return err;
+ return 0;
}
void xe_tile_migrate_wait(struct xe_tile *tile)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
index 7033f8c1b431..4feb35c95a1c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
@@ -32,11 +32,8 @@ uc_to_xe(struct xe_uc *uc)
/* Should be called once at driver load only */
int xe_uc_init(struct xe_uc *uc)
{
- struct xe_device *xe = uc_to_xe(uc);
int ret;
- xe_device_mem_access_get(xe);
-
/*
* We call the GuC/HuC/GSC init functions even if GuC submission is off
* to correctly move our tracking of the FW state to "disabled".
@@ -65,16 +62,8 @@ int xe_uc_init(struct xe_uc *uc)
goto err;
ret = xe_guc_db_mgr_init(&uc->guc.dbm, ~0);
- if (ret)
- goto err;
-
- xe_device_mem_access_put(xe);
-
- return 0;
err:
- xe_device_mem_access_put(xe);
-
return ret;
}
--
2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240311192303.33961-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2024-03-11 19:22 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/xe: Introduce intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume at compat-i915-headers for display Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:32 ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:22 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/display: convert inner wakeref get towards get_if_in_use Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:22 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/xe: Move lockdep protection from mem_access to xe_pm_runtime Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:22 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/xe: Convert GSC HDCP from mem_access to direct xe_pm_runtime calls Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-03-11 19:22 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/xe: Convert xe_gem_fault to use " Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:23 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/xe: Removing extra mem_access protection from runtime pm Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:23 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/xe: Convert mem_access_if_ongoing to direct xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:23 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/xe: Ensure all the inner access are using the _noresume variant Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:23 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/xe: Kill xe_device_mem_access_{get*,put} Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 19:28 ` [PATCH] drm/xe: Introduce xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume for inner callers Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-11 20:33 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Introduce xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume for inner callers (rev2) Patchwork
2024-03-11 20:34 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 20:35 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 20:45 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 20:48 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-03-11 20:49 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-03-11 21:16 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-03-14 14:10 [PATCH 01/11] drm/xe: Introduce xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume for inner callers Rodrigo Vivi
2024-03-14 14:10 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/xe: Remove useless mem_access during probe Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240311192303.33961-6-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox