From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/20] drm/xe/display: move device_remove over to drmm
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 18:43:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202405111815.TdKOTxKQ-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240510181212.264622-42-matthew.auld@intel.com>
Hi Matthew,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-xe/drm-xe-next]
[also build test WARNING on drm-misc/drm-misc-next next-20240510]
[cannot apply to linus/master v6.9-rc7]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Matthew-Auld/drm-drm_managed-try-to-improve-the-drmm-DOC/20240511-061452
base: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel.git drm-xe-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240510181212.264622-42-matthew.auld%40intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH 20/20] drm/xe/display: move device_remove over to drmm
config: s390-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240511/202405111815.TdKOTxKQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240511/202405111815.TdKOTxKQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405111815.TdKOTxKQ-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c:18:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h: In function 'xe_display_probe':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h:50:43: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
50 | static inline int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~
vim +50 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
49
> 50 static inline int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe) { }
51
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-11 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-10 18:12 [PATCH 00/20] core_hotunplug improvements Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 01/20] drm/drm_managed: try to improve the drmm DOC Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 7:06 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-13 15:38 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 02/20] drm/amdgpu: don't trample pdev drvdata Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 11:54 ` Christian König
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 03/20] drm/xe/pci: remove broken driver_release Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 7:14 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 04/20] drm/xe: covert sysfs over to devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 05/20] drm/xe/ggtt: use drm_dev_enter to mark device section Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 7:16 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-13 19:34 ` Randhawa, Jagmeet
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 06/20] drm/xe/guc: move guc_fini over to devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 07/20] drm/xe/guc: s/guc_fini/guc_fini_hw/ Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 7:30 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 08/20] drm/xe/guc_pc: move pc_fini to devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 09/20] drm/xe/guc_pc: s/pc_fini/pc_fini_hw/ Matthew Auld
2024-05-11 9:19 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-13 7:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 10/20] drm/xe/irq: move irq_uninstall over to devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 11/20] drm/xe/device: move flr " Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 12/20] drm/xe/device: move xe_device_sanitize over " Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 13/20] drm/xe/coredump: move " Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 7:38 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 14/20] drm/xe/gt: break out gt_fini into sw vs hw state Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 7:50 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-13 8:37 ` Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 9:19 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 15/20] drm/xe: make gt_remove use devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 7:58 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 16/20] drm/xe/mmio: move mmio_fini over to devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 8:00 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 17/20] drm/xe: reset mmio mappings with devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 8:12 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 18/20] drm/xe/display: move display fini stuff to devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 8:13 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 19/20] drm/xe/display: stop calling domains_driver_remove twice Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 8:19 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-13 8:27 ` Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 9:17 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 20/20] drm/xe/display: move device_remove over to drmm Matthew Auld
2024-05-11 10:33 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-11 10:43 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-05-13 8:22 ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:17 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for core_hotunplug improvements Patchwork
2024-05-10 18:18 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-05-10 18:18 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202405111815.TdKOTxKQ-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox