Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/20] drm/amdgpu: don't trample pdev drvdata
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 13:54:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <849adc1e-b4fc-4fd1-aefb-d5da2d8c560a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240510181212.264622-24-matthew.auld@intel.com>

Am 10.05.24 um 20:12 schrieb Matthew Auld:
> The driver release callback is called when a particular drm_device goes
> away, just like with drmm, so here we should never nuke the pdev drvdata
> pointer, since that could already be pointing to a new drvdata.
> For example something hotunplugs the device, for which we have an open
> driver fd, keeping the drm_device alive, and in the meantime the same
> physical device is re-attached to a new drm_device therefore setting
> drvdata again. Once the original drm_device goes away, we might then
> call the release which then incorrectly tramples the drvdata.
>
> The driver core will already nuke the pointer for us when the pci device
> is removed, so should be safe to simply drop. Alternative would be to
> move to the driver pci remove callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

Oh! Very good catch! That might become important for a feature we 
current discuss internally.

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
> index a0ea6fe8d060..d5fed007c698 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
> @@ -1450,7 +1450,6 @@ void amdgpu_driver_release_kms(struct drm_device *dev)
>   	struct amdgpu_device *adev = drm_to_adev(dev);
>   
>   	amdgpu_device_fini_sw(adev);
> -	pci_set_drvdata(adev->pdev, NULL);
>   }
>   
>   /*


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-13 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-10 18:12 [PATCH 00/20] core_hotunplug improvements Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 01/20] drm/drm_managed: try to improve the drmm DOC Matthew Auld
2024-05-13  7:06   ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-13 15:38   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 02/20] drm/amdgpu: don't trample pdev drvdata Matthew Auld
2024-05-13 11:54   ` Christian König [this message]
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 03/20] drm/xe/pci: remove broken driver_release Matthew Auld
2024-05-13  7:14   ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 04/20] drm/xe: covert sysfs over to devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 05/20] drm/xe/ggtt: use drm_dev_enter to mark device section Matthew Auld
2024-05-13  7:16   ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-13 19:34   ` Randhawa, Jagmeet
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 06/20] drm/xe/guc: move guc_fini over to devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 07/20] drm/xe/guc: s/guc_fini/guc_fini_hw/ Matthew Auld
2024-05-13  7:30   ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 08/20] drm/xe/guc_pc: move pc_fini to devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 09/20] drm/xe/guc_pc: s/pc_fini/pc_fini_hw/ Matthew Auld
2024-05-11  9:19   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-13  7:37   ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 10/20] drm/xe/irq: move irq_uninstall over to devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 11/20] drm/xe/device: move flr " Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 12/20] drm/xe/device: move xe_device_sanitize over " Matthew Auld
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 13/20] drm/xe/coredump: move " Matthew Auld
2024-05-13  7:38   ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 14/20] drm/xe/gt: break out gt_fini into sw vs hw state Matthew Auld
2024-05-13  7:50   ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-13  8:37     ` Matthew Auld
2024-05-13  9:19       ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 15/20] drm/xe: make gt_remove use devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-13  7:58   ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 16/20] drm/xe/mmio: move mmio_fini over to devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-13  8:00   ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 17/20] drm/xe: reset mmio mappings with devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-13  8:12   ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 18/20] drm/xe/display: move display fini stuff to devm Matthew Auld
2024-05-13  8:13   ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 19/20] drm/xe/display: stop calling domains_driver_remove twice Matthew Auld
2024-05-13  8:19   ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-13  8:27     ` Matthew Auld
2024-05-13  9:17       ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:12 ` [PATCH 20/20] drm/xe/display: move device_remove over to drmm Matthew Auld
2024-05-11 10:33   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-11 10:43   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-13  8:22   ` Andrzej Hajda
2024-05-10 18:17 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for core_hotunplug improvements Patchwork
2024-05-10 18:18 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-05-10 18:18 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=849adc1e-b4fc-4fd1-aefb-d5da2d8c560a@gmail.com \
    --to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox