Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
	Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 02/23] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:51:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240917122126.438448-3-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240917122126.438448-1-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>

Instead of calling xe_force_wake_put on all domains that were input to
xe_force_wake_get, call _put only on the domains whose reference counts
were successfully incremented by the _get call. Since the return value
of _get can be a mask that does not match any specific value in the enum
xe_force_wake_domains, change the input parameter of _put to xe_wakeref_t.

v3
- Move WARN to this patch (Badal)
- use xe_gt_WARN instead of XE_WARN (Michal)
- Stop using xe_force_wake_domains for non enum values.
- Remove kernel-doc from this patch (Badal)

Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
index bc0cb988e12f..802e5927dd81 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
@@ -197,26 +197,36 @@ xe_wakeref_t xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
 }
 
 int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
-		      enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
+		      xe_wakeref_t domains_mask)
 {
 	struct xe_gt *gt = fw->gt;
 	struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
-	enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, sleep = 0;
+	unsigned int tmp, sleep = 0;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * Avoid unnecessary lock and unlock when the function is called
+	 * in error path of individual domains.
+	 */
+	if (!domains_mask)
+		return 0;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&fw->lock, flags);
-	for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, domains, fw, tmp) {
+	for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, domains_mask, fw, tmp) {
 		if (!--domain->ref) {
 			sleep |= BIT(domain->id);
 			domain_sleep(gt, domain);
 		}
 	}
 	for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, sleep, fw, tmp) {
-		ret |= domain_sleep_wait(gt, domain);
+		if (domain_sleep_wait(gt, domain))
+			ret |= BIT(domain->id);
 	}
 	fw->awake_domains &= ~sleep;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
 
+	xe_gt_WARN(gt, ret, "domain%s %#x failed to acknowledgment sleep\n",
+		   str_plural(hweight_long(ret)), ret);
 	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
index 3ac686519a4e..6c8c46777b79 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt,
 xe_wakeref_t xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
 			       enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
 int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
-		      enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
+		      xe_wakeref_t domains_mask);
 
 static inline int
 xe_force_wake_ref(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-17 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-17 12:21 [PATCH v3 00/23] Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 01/23] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` Himal Prasad Ghimiray [this message]
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 03/23] drm/xe/device: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 04/23] drm/xe/hdcp: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/23] drm/xe/gsc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 06/23] drm/xe/gt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 07/23] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 08/23] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 09/23] drm/xe/tests/mocs: Update xe_force_wake_get() return handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 10/23] drm/xe/mocs: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 11/23] drm/xe/xe_drm_client: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 12/23] drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 13/23] drm/xe/guc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 14/23] drm/xe/huc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 15/23] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 16/23] drm/xe/pat: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 17/23] drm/xe/gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 18/23] drm/xe/xe_reg_sr: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 19/23] drm/xe/query: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 20/23] drm/xe/vram: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 21/23] drm/xe: forcewake debugfs open fails on xe_forcewake_get failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 22/23] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 23/23] drm/xe: Change return type to void for xe_force_wake_put Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 13:18 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev3) Patchwork
2024-09-17 13:18 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-17 13:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-17 13:35 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-17 13:37 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-17 13:39 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-09-17 14:05 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-17 17:53   ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-17 16:55 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240917122126.438448-3-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox