From: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 03/23] drm/xe/device: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:51:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240917122126.438448-4-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240917122126.438448-1-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
With xe_force_wake_get() now returning the refcount-incremented domain
mask, the return value will be 0 for single domains (excluding
XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL) in the event of a failure. Modify the return handling
of xe_force_wake_get() accordingly and pass the return value as input to
xe_force_wake_put().
v3
- return xe_wakeref_t instead of int in xe_force_wake_get()
- xe_force_wake_put() error doesn't need to be escalated/considered as
probing error. It internally WARNS on domain ack failure.
Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
index 4d3c794f134c..c19fbdd28179 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ static int probe_has_flat_ccs(struct xe_device *xe)
{
struct xe_gt *gt;
u32 reg;
- int err;
+ xe_wakeref_t fw_ref;
/* Always enabled/disabled, no runtime check to do */
if (GRAPHICS_VER(xe) < 20 || !xe->info.has_flat_ccs)
@@ -609,9 +609,9 @@ static int probe_has_flat_ccs(struct xe_device *xe)
gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
- err = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
- if (err)
- return err;
+ fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
+ if (!fw_ref)
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
reg = xe_gt_mcr_unicast_read_any(gt, XE2_FLAT_CCS_BASE_RANGE_LOWER);
xe->info.has_flat_ccs = (reg & XE2_FLAT_CCS_ENABLE);
@@ -620,7 +620,8 @@ static int probe_has_flat_ccs(struct xe_device *xe)
drm_dbg(&xe->drm,
"Flat CCS has been disabled in bios, May lead to performance impact");
- return xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
+ xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
+ return 0;
}
int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
@@ -867,6 +868,7 @@ void xe_device_td_flush(struct xe_device *xe)
{
struct xe_gt *gt;
u8 id;
+ xe_wakeref_t fw_ref;
if (!IS_DGFX(xe) || GRAPHICS_VER(xe) < 20)
return;
@@ -880,7 +882,8 @@ void xe_device_td_flush(struct xe_device *xe)
if (xe_gt_is_media_type(gt))
continue;
- if (xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT))
+ fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
+ if (!fw_ref)
return;
xe_mmio_write32(>->mmio, XE2_TDF_CTRL, TRANSIENT_FLUSH_REQUEST);
@@ -895,22 +898,22 @@ void xe_device_td_flush(struct xe_device *xe)
150, NULL, false))
xe_gt_err_once(gt, "TD flush timeout\n");
- xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
+ xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
}
}
void xe_device_l2_flush(struct xe_device *xe)
{
struct xe_gt *gt;
- int err;
+ xe_wakeref_t fw_ref;
gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
if (!XE_WA(gt, 16023588340))
return;
- err = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
- if (err)
+ fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
+ if (!fw_ref)
return;
spin_lock(>->global_invl_lock);
@@ -920,7 +923,7 @@ void xe_device_l2_flush(struct xe_device *xe)
xe_gt_err_once(gt, "Global invalidation timeout\n");
spin_unlock(>->global_invl_lock);
- xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
+ xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
}
u32 xe_device_ccs_bytes(struct xe_device *xe, u64 size)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-17 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-17 12:21 [PATCH v3 00/23] Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 01/23] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 02/23] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` Himal Prasad Ghimiray [this message]
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 04/23] drm/xe/hdcp: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/23] drm/xe/gsc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 06/23] drm/xe/gt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 07/23] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 08/23] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 09/23] drm/xe/tests/mocs: Update xe_force_wake_get() return handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 10/23] drm/xe/mocs: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 11/23] drm/xe/xe_drm_client: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 12/23] drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 13/23] drm/xe/guc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 14/23] drm/xe/huc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 15/23] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 16/23] drm/xe/pat: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 17/23] drm/xe/gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 18/23] drm/xe/xe_reg_sr: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 19/23] drm/xe/query: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 20/23] drm/xe/vram: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 21/23] drm/xe: forcewake debugfs open fails on xe_forcewake_get failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 22/23] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 23/23] drm/xe: Change return type to void for xe_force_wake_put Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-09-17 13:18 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev3) Patchwork
2024-09-17 13:18 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-17 13:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-17 13:35 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-17 13:37 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-17 13:39 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-09-17 14:05 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-17 17:53 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2024-09-17 16:55 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240917122126.438448-4-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox