From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Sai Teja Pottumuttu <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>,
Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/xe/xe2: Add performance tuning for L3 cache flushing
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:26:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240920192644.GW5091@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240920171223.64969-5-gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 02:12:11PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> A recommended performance tuning for LNL related to L3 cache flushing
> was recently introduced in Bspec. Implement it.
>
> v2:
> - Fix reference to Bspec. (Sai Teja, Tejas)
> - Use correct register name for "Tuning: L3 RW flush all Cache". (Sai
> Teja)
> - Use SCRATCH3_LBCF (with the underscore) for better readability.
>
> Bspec: 72161
> Cc: Sai Teja Pottumuttu <sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com>
> Cc: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h | 5 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> index 07315eb72eff..8d8f6a113a86 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> @@ -388,6 +388,9 @@
> #define L3SQCREG3 XE_REG_MCR(0xb108)
> #define COMPPWOVERFETCHEN REG_BIT(28)
>
> +#define SCRATCH3_LBCF XE_REG_MCR(0xb154)
> +#define RWFLUSHALLEN REG_BIT(17)
> +
> #define XEHP_L3SQCREG5 XE_REG_MCR(0xb158)
> #define L3_PWM_TIMER_INIT_VAL_MASK REG_GENMASK(9, 0)
>
> @@ -405,6 +408,8 @@
>
> #define XE2LPM_L3SQCREG3 XE_REG_MCR(0xb608)
>
> +#define XE2LPM_SCRATCH3_LBCF XE_REG_MCR(0xb654)
> +
> #define XE2LPM_L3SQCREG5 XE_REG_MCR(0xb658)
>
> #define XE2_TDF_CTRL XE_REG(0xb418)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c
> index 230369f108ab..39f50b6f94ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,14 @@ static const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr gt_tunings[] = {
> XE_RTP_ACTIONS(FIELD_SET(STATELESS_COMPRESSION_CTRL, UNIFIED_COMPRESSION_FORMAT,
> REG_FIELD_PREP(UNIFIED_COMPRESSION_FORMAT, 0)))
> },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("Tuning: L3 RW flush all Cache"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(2004, XE_RTP_END_VERSION_UNDEFINED)),
The bspec tagging on this one is a bit of a mess right now, but when I
look at the ticket that originally added this to the bspec, there's an
underlined comment there that says "only for LNL." We might want to
check with the hardware guys to clarify if that's still the case and, if
so, make this one of the special cases where the tuning applies solely
to this one version.
Matt
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(SCRATCH3_LBCF, RWFLUSHALLEN))
> + },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("Tuning: L3 RW flush all cache - media"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(MEDIA_VERSION_RANGE(2000, XE_RTP_END_VERSION_UNDEFINED)),
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(XE2LPM_SCRATCH3_LBCF, RWFLUSHALLEN))
> + },
>
> {}
> };
> --
> 2.46.1
>
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-20 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-20 17:12 [PATCH v2 0/4] Xe2 performance tuning updates Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-20 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/xe/mcr: Use Xe2_LPM steering tables for Xe2_HPM Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-20 19:18 ` Matt Roper
2024-09-20 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/xe/xe2: Extend performance tuning to media GT Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-20 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/xe/xe2: Assume tuning settings also apply for future " Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-20 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/xe/xe2: Add performance tuning for L3 cache flushing Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-20 19:26 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2024-09-20 20:06 ` Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-20 20:28 ` Matt Roper
2024-09-20 17:18 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Xe2 performance tuning updates (rev2) Patchwork
2024-09-20 17:18 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-20 17:19 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-09-20 17:31 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-20 17:33 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-20 17:34 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-09-20 17:53 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-09-20 22:15 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240920192644.GW5091@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sai.teja.pottumuttu@intel.com \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox