Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/dsc: Introduce odd pixel removal
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:22:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241023065257.190035-15-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241023065257.190035-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

With 3 DSC engines we can support 12 slices. With ultra joiner
usecase while dividing the width into 12 slices, we might
end up having odd number of pixels per pipe.

As per Bspec, pipe src size should be even, so an extra pixel is added
in each pipe. For Pipe A and C the odd pixel is added at the end of
pipe and for Pipe B and D it is added at the beginning of the pipe.
This extra pixel needs to be dropped in Splitter hardware.

Introduce bits to account for odd pixel removal while programming DSS CTL.
Add a new member in crtc state to track if we need to account for the
odd pixel.

Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c       | 1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c          | 9 +++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h     | 2 ++
 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 8065ed921952..bab1ab1236df 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -5762,6 +5762,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
 	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dsc.num_streams);
 	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dsc.compressed_bpp_x16);
 	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dsc.replicated_pixels);
+	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(dsc.has_odd_pixel);
 
 	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(splitter.enable);
 	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(splitter.link_count);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
index 282aab2d1b5d..9a4a699d34c4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
@@ -1235,6 +1235,7 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
 	/* Display Stream compression state */
 	struct {
 		bool compression_enable;
+		bool has_odd_pixel;
 		int num_streams;
 		/* Compressed Bpp in U6.4 format (first 4 bits for fractional part) */
 		u16 compressed_bpp_x16;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
index 0aa2d96ee329..71c69be7989f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
@@ -797,6 +797,12 @@ void intel_dsc_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 			dss_ctl1_val |= PRIMARY_BIG_JOINER_ENABLE;
 	}
 
+	if (crtc_state->dsc.has_odd_pixel) {
+		dss_ctl2_val |= ODD_PIXEL_REMOVAL;
+		if (crtc->pipe == PIPE_A || crtc->pipe == PIPE_C)
+			dss_ctl2_val |= ODD_PIXEL_REMOVAL_CONFIG_EOL;
+	}
+
 	if (crtc_state->dsc.replicated_pixels)
 		dss_ctl3_val = DSC_PIXEL_REPLICATION(crtc_state->dsc.replicated_pixels);
 
@@ -1011,6 +1017,9 @@ void intel_dsc_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 		crtc_state->dsc.num_streams = 0;
 	}
 
+	if (dss_ctl2 & ODD_PIXEL_REMOVAL)
+		crtc_state->dsc.has_odd_pixel = true;
+
 	if (dss_ctl3 & DSC_PIXEL_REPLICATION_MASK)
 		crtc_state->dsc.replicated_pixels =
 			dss_ctl3 & DSC_PIXEL_REPLICATION_MASK;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h
index f07fad6239bc..9c4cf80c2064 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
 #define  VDSC0_ENABLE				REG_BIT(31)
 #define  VDSC2_ENABLE				REG_BIT(30)
 #define  SMALL_JOINER_CONFIG_3_ENGINES		REG_BIT(23)
+#define  ODD_PIXEL_REMOVAL			REG_BIT(18)
+#define  ODD_PIXEL_REMOVAL_CONFIG_EOL		REG_BIT(17)
 #define  VDSC1_ENABLE				REG_BIT(15)
 #define  RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK		(0xfff << 0)
 #define  RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(pixels)	((pixels) << 0)
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-23  6:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-23  6:52 [PATCH 00/16] Add support for 3 VDSC engines 12 slices Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/dp: Update Comment for Valid DSC Slices per Line Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/display: Prepare for dsc 3 stream splitter Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  8:42   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/vdsc: Use VDSC0/VDSC1 for LEFT/RIGHT VDSC engine Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/vdsc: Introduce 3rd VDSC engine VDSC2 Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  8:34   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/vdsc: Add support for read/write PPS for 3rd DSC engine Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/dp: Ensure hactive is divisible by slice count Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  8:35   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/dp: Enable 3 DSC engines for 12 slices Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  8:38   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/display: Add macro HAS_PIXEL_REPLICATION Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  8:39   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/display: Add support for DSC pixel replication Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Account for pixel replication for MST overhead with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/dp: Account for pixel replication for BW computation " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/display: Account for pixel replication in pipe_src Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/dp: Enable DSC pixel replication Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  6:52 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/display: Adjust Pipe SRC Width for Odd Pixels Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  6:52 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/dp: Add Check for Odd Pixel Requirement Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-23  6:56 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add support for 3 VDSC engines 12 slices (rev5) Patchwork
2024-10-23  6:57 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-23  6:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-10-23  7:09 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-23  7:12 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-23  7:13 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-23  7:40 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-23 10:55 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-21 12:33 [PATCH 00/16] Add support for 3 VDSC engines 12 slices Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/dsc: Introduce odd pixel removal Ankit Nautiyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241023065257.190035-15-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox