From: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>,
Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Fix missing init value and add register order check
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 10:24:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241104182425.162007-1-zhanjun.dong@intel.com> (raw)
Fix missing initial value for last_value.
For GuC capture register definition, it is required to define 64bit
register in a pair of 2 consecutive 32bit register entries, low first,
then hi. Add code to check this order.
Fixes: ecb633646391 ("drm/xe/guc: Plumb GuC-capture into dev coredump")
Signed-off-by: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Changes from prior revs:
v2:- Correct the fix tag pointed commit
Add examples in comments for warning
Add 1 missing hi condition check
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
index cc72446a5de1..8e534471b566 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct __guc_capture_parsed_output {
* A 64 bit register define requires 2 consecutive entries,
* with low dword first and hi dword the second.
* 2. Register name: null for incompleted define
+ * 3. Incorrect order will trigger XE_WARN.
*/
#define COMMON_XELP_BASE_GLOBAL \
{ FORCEWAKE_GT, REG_32BIT, 0, 0, "FORCEWAKE_GT"}
@@ -1675,10 +1676,10 @@ snapshot_print_by_list_order(struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_
struct xe_devcoredump *devcoredump = &xe->devcoredump;
struct xe_devcoredump_snapshot *devcore_snapshot = &devcoredump->snapshot;
struct gcap_reg_list_info *reginfo = NULL;
- u32 last_value, i;
- bool is_ext;
+ u32 i, last_value = 0;
+ bool is_ext, low32_ready = false;
- if (!list || list->num_regs == 0)
+ if (!list || !list->list || list->num_regs == 0)
return;
XE_WARN_ON(!devcore_snapshot->matched_node);
@@ -1701,29 +1702,76 @@ snapshot_print_by_list_order(struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_
continue;
value = reg->value;
- if (reg_desc->data_type == REG_64BIT_LOW_DW) {
+ switch (reg_desc->data_type) {
+ case REG_64BIT_LOW_DW:
last_value = value;
+
+ /*
+ * A 64 bit register define requires 2 consecutive
+ * entries in register list, with low dword first
+ * and hi dword the second, like:
+ * { XXX_REG_LO(0), REG_64BIT_LOW_DW, 0, 0, NULL},
+ * { XXX_REG_HI(0), REG_64BIT_HI_DW, 0, 0, "XXX_REG"},
+ *
+ * Incorrect order will trigger XE_WARN.
+ *
+ * Possible double low here, for example:
+ * { XXX_REG_LO(0), REG_64BIT_LOW_DW, 0, 0, NULL},
+ * { XXX_REG_LO(0), REG_64BIT_LOW_DW, 0, 0, NULL},
+ */
+ XE_WARN_ON(low32_ready);
+ low32_ready = true;
/* Low 32 bit dword saved, continue for high 32 bit */
- continue;
- } else if (reg_desc->data_type == REG_64BIT_HI_DW) {
+ break;
+
+ case REG_64BIT_HI_DW: {
u64 value_qw = ((u64)value << 32) | last_value;
+ /* Incorrect 64bit register order. Possible missing low.
+ * for example:
+ * { XXX_REG(0), REG_32BIT, 0, 0, NULL},
+ * { XXX_REG_HI(0), REG_64BIT_HI_DW, 0, 0, NULL},
+ */
+ XE_WARN_ON(!low32_ready);
+ low32_ready = false;
+
drm_printf(p, "\t%s: 0x%016llx\n", reg_desc->regname, value_qw);
- continue;
- }
+ }
+ break;
+
+ case REG_32BIT:
+ if (low32_ready) {
+ /* Incorrect 64bit register order. Possible missing high.
+ * for example:
+ * { XXX_REG_LO(0), REG_64BIT_LOW_DW, 0, 0, NULL},
+ * { XXX_REG(0), REG_32BIT, 0, 0, "XXX_REG"},
+ */
+ XE_WARN_ON(!low32_ready);
+ low32_ready = false;
+ break;
+ }
- if (is_ext) {
- int dss, group, instance;
+ if (is_ext) {
+ int dss, group, instance;
- group = FIELD_GET(GUC_REGSET_STEERING_GROUP, reg_desc->flags);
- instance = FIELD_GET(GUC_REGSET_STEERING_INSTANCE, reg_desc->flags);
- dss = xe_gt_mcr_steering_info_to_dss_id(gt, group, instance);
+ group = FIELD_GET(GUC_REGSET_STEERING_GROUP, reg_desc->flags);
+ instance = FIELD_GET(GUC_REGSET_STEERING_INSTANCE, reg_desc->flags);
+ dss = xe_gt_mcr_steering_info_to_dss_id(gt, group, instance);
- drm_printf(p, "\t%s[%u]: 0x%08x\n", reg_desc->regname, dss, value);
- } else {
- drm_printf(p, "\t%s: 0x%08x\n", reg_desc->regname, value);
+ drm_printf(p, "\t%s[%u]: 0x%08x\n", reg_desc->regname, dss, value);
+ } else {
+ drm_printf(p, "\t%s: 0x%08x\n", reg_desc->regname, value);
+ }
+ break;
}
}
+
+ /* Incorrect 64bit register order. Possible missing high.
+ * for example:
+ * { XXX_REG_LO(0), REG_64BIT_LOW_DW, 0, 0, NULL},
+ * } // <- Register list end
+ */
+ XE_WARN_ON(low32_ready);
}
/**
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-04 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-04 18:24 Zhanjun Dong [this message]
2024-11-04 19:31 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix missing init value and add register order check Patchwork
2024-11-04 19:32 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-11-04 19:33 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-11-04 19:45 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-04 19:47 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-04 19:48 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-11-04 20:24 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-11-05 12:49 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-05 15:20 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2024-11-05 19:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2024-11-05 20:54 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2024-11-05 22:04 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2024-11-05 23:14 ` Dong, Zhanjun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241104182425.162007-1-zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
--to=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
--cc=alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox