Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: kenneth.w.graunke@intel.com, lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com,
	jose.souza@intel.com, simona.vetter@ffwll.ch,
	thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, boris.brezillon@collabora.com,
	airlied@gmail.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
	mihail.atanassov@arm.com, steven.price@arm.com,
	shashank.sharma@amd.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 25/29] drm/xe: Add a message lock to the Xe GPU scheduler
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:37:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241118233757.2374041-26-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241118233757.2374041-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>

Stop abusing job list lock for message, use a dedicated lock. This lock
will soon be able to be taken in IRQ contexts, using irqsave for
simplicity. Can to tweaked in a follow up as needed.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c       | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h       | 12 ++++--------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c          | 15 +++++++++------
 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c
index 50361b4638f9..55ccfb587523 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c
@@ -14,25 +14,27 @@ static void xe_sched_process_msg_queue(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 static void xe_sched_process_msg_queue_if_ready(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 {
 	struct xe_sched_msg *msg;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-	xe_sched_msg_lock(sched);
+	xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags);
 	msg = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->msgs, struct xe_sched_msg, link);
 	if (msg)
 		xe_sched_process_msg_queue(sched);
-	xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
+	xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags);
 }
 
 static struct xe_sched_msg *
 xe_sched_get_msg(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 {
 	struct xe_sched_msg *msg;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-	xe_sched_msg_lock(sched);
+	xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags);
 	msg = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->msgs,
 				       struct xe_sched_msg, link);
 	if (msg)
 		list_del_init(&msg->link);
-	xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
+	xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags);
 
 	return msg;
 }
@@ -64,6 +66,7 @@ int xe_sched_init(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched,
 		  struct device *dev)
 {
 	sched->ops = xe_ops;
+	spin_lock_init(&sched->msg_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sched->msgs);
 	INIT_WORK(&sched->work_process_msg, xe_sched_process_msg_work);
 
@@ -98,15 +101,17 @@ void xe_sched_submission_resume_tdr(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 void xe_sched_add_msg(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched,
 		      struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
 {
-	xe_sched_msg_lock(sched);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags);
 	xe_sched_add_msg_locked(sched, msg);
-	xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
+	xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags);
 }
 
 void xe_sched_add_msg_locked(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched,
 			     struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&sched->base.job_list_lock);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&sched->msg_lock);
 
 	list_add_tail(&msg->link, &sched->msgs);
 	xe_sched_process_msg_queue(sched);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
index c250ea773491..3238de26dcfe 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
@@ -29,15 +29,11 @@ void xe_sched_add_msg(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched,
 void xe_sched_add_msg_locked(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched,
 			     struct xe_sched_msg *msg);
 
-static inline void xe_sched_msg_lock(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
-{
-	spin_lock(&sched->base.job_list_lock);
-}
+#define xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags) \
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->msg_lock, flags)
 
-static inline void xe_sched_msg_unlock(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
-{
-	spin_unlock(&sched->base.job_list_lock);
-}
+#define xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags) \
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->msg_lock, flags)
 
 static inline void xe_sched_stop(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h
index 6731b13da8bb..c8e0352ef941 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ struct xe_gpu_scheduler {
 	const struct xe_sched_backend_ops	*ops;
 	/** @msgs: list of messages to be processed in @work_process_msg */
 	struct list_head			msgs;
+	/** @msg_lock: Lock for messages */
+	spinlock_t msg_lock;
 	/** @work_process_msg: processes messages */
 	struct work_struct		work_process_msg;
 };
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
index 82071a0ec91e..3efd2000c0a2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
@@ -1704,14 +1704,15 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_suspend(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
 {
 	struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
 	struct xe_sched_msg *msg = q->guc->static_msgs + STATIC_MSG_SUSPEND;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (exec_queue_killed_or_banned_or_wedged(q))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	xe_sched_msg_lock(sched);
+	xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags);
 	if (guc_exec_queue_try_add_msg(q, msg, SUSPEND))
 		q->guc->suspend_pending = true;
-	xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
+	xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1751,30 +1752,32 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_resume(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
 	struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
 	struct xe_sched_msg *msg = q->guc->static_msgs + STATIC_MSG_RESUME;
 	struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), !q->guc->suspend_pending);
 
-	xe_sched_msg_lock(sched);
+	xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags);
 	guc_exec_queue_try_add_msg(q, msg, RESUME);
-	xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
+	xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags);
 }
 
 static void guc_exec_queue_kill_user(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
 {
 	struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
 	struct xe_sched_msg *msg = q->guc->static_msgs + STATIC_MSG_KILL_USER;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (exec_queue_extra_ref(q))
 		return;
 
 	set_exec_queue_banned(q);
 
-	xe_sched_msg_lock(sched);
+	xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags);
 	if (guc_exec_queue_try_add_msg(q, msg, KILL_USER)) {
 		set_exec_queue_extra_ref(q);
 		xe_exec_queue_get(q);
 	}
-	xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
+	xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags);
 }
 
 static bool guc_exec_queue_reset_status(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-18 23:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-18 23:37 [RFC PATCH 00/29] UMD direct submission in Xe Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 01/29] dma-fence: Add dma_fence_preempt base class Matthew Brost
2024-11-20 13:31   ` Christian König
2024-11-20 17:36     ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-21 10:04       ` Christian König
2024-11-21 18:41         ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-22 10:56           ` Christian König
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 02/29] dma-fence: Add dma_fence_user_fence Matthew Brost
2024-11-20 13:38   ` Christian König
2024-11-20 22:50     ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-21  9:31       ` Christian König
2024-11-22  2:35         ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-22 10:28           ` Christian König
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 03/29] drm/xe: Use dma_fence_preempt base class Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 04/29] drm/xe: Allocate doorbells for UMD exec queues Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 05/29] drm/xe: Add doorbell ID to snapshot capture Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 06/29] drm/xe: Break submission ring out into its own BO Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 07/29] drm/xe: Break indirect ring state " Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 08/29] drm/xe: Clear GGTT in xe_bo_restore_kernel Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 09/29] FIXME: drm/xe: Add pad to ring and indirect state Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 10/29] drm/xe: Enable indirect ring on media GT Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 11/29] drm/xe: Don't add pinned mappings to VM bulk move Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 12/29] drm/xe: Add exec queue post init extension processing Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 13/29] drm/xe/mmap: Add mmap support for PCI memory barrier Matthew Brost
2024-11-19 10:00   ` Christian König
2024-11-19 11:57     ` Joonas Lahtinen
2024-11-19 12:42       ` Mrozek, Michal
2024-12-18 12:59         ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 14/29] drm/xe: Add support for mmapping doorbells to user space Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 15/29] drm/xe: Add support for mmapping submission ring and indirect ring state " Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 16/29] drm/xe/uapi: Define UMD exec queue mapping uAPI Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 17/29] drm/xe: Add usermap exec queue extension Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 18/29] drm/xe: Drop EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_UMD_SUBMISSION flag Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 19/29] drm/xe: Do not allow usermap exec queues in exec IOCTL Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 20/29] drm/xe: Teach GuC backend to kill usermap queues Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 21/29] drm/xe: Enable preempt fences on " Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 22/29] drm/xe/uapi: Add uAPI to convert user semaphore to / from drm syncobj Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 23/29] drm/xe: Add user fence IRQ handler Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 24/29] drm/xe: Add xe_hw_fence_user_init Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 26/29] drm/xe: Always wait on preempt fences in vma_check_userptr Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 27/29] drm/xe: Teach xe_sync layer about drm_xe_semaphore Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 28/29] drm/xe: Add VM convert fence IOCTL Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 29/29] drm/xe: Add user fence TDR Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:55 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for UMD direct submission in Xe Patchwork
2024-11-18 23:56 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-18 23:57 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-11-19  0:15 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-19  0:17 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-19  0:19 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-11-19  0:39 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-19 11:44 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241118233757.2374041-26-matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=kenneth.w.graunke@intel.com \
    --cc=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
    --cc=mihail.atanassov@arm.com \
    --cc=shashank.sharma@amd.com \
    --cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox