From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: kenneth.w.graunke@intel.com, lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com,
jose.souza@intel.com, simona.vetter@ffwll.ch,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, boris.brezillon@collabora.com,
airlied@gmail.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
mihail.atanassov@arm.com, steven.price@arm.com,
shashank.sharma@amd.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 25/29] drm/xe: Add a message lock to the Xe GPU scheduler
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:37:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241118233757.2374041-26-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241118233757.2374041-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Stop abusing job list lock for message, use a dedicated lock. This lock
will soon be able to be taken in IRQ contexts, using irqsave for
simplicity. Can to tweaked in a follow up as needed.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h | 12 ++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 15 +++++++++------
4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c
index 50361b4638f9..55ccfb587523 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c
@@ -14,25 +14,27 @@ static void xe_sched_process_msg_queue(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
static void xe_sched_process_msg_queue_if_ready(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
{
struct xe_sched_msg *msg;
+ unsigned long flags;
- xe_sched_msg_lock(sched);
+ xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags);
msg = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->msgs, struct xe_sched_msg, link);
if (msg)
xe_sched_process_msg_queue(sched);
- xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
+ xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags);
}
static struct xe_sched_msg *
xe_sched_get_msg(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
{
struct xe_sched_msg *msg;
+ unsigned long flags;
- xe_sched_msg_lock(sched);
+ xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags);
msg = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->msgs,
struct xe_sched_msg, link);
if (msg)
list_del_init(&msg->link);
- xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
+ xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags);
return msg;
}
@@ -64,6 +66,7 @@ int xe_sched_init(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched,
struct device *dev)
{
sched->ops = xe_ops;
+ spin_lock_init(&sched->msg_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sched->msgs);
INIT_WORK(&sched->work_process_msg, xe_sched_process_msg_work);
@@ -98,15 +101,17 @@ void xe_sched_submission_resume_tdr(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
void xe_sched_add_msg(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched,
struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
{
- xe_sched_msg_lock(sched);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags);
xe_sched_add_msg_locked(sched, msg);
- xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
+ xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags);
}
void xe_sched_add_msg_locked(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched,
struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
{
- lockdep_assert_held(&sched->base.job_list_lock);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&sched->msg_lock);
list_add_tail(&msg->link, &sched->msgs);
xe_sched_process_msg_queue(sched);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
index c250ea773491..3238de26dcfe 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.h
@@ -29,15 +29,11 @@ void xe_sched_add_msg(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched,
void xe_sched_add_msg_locked(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched,
struct xe_sched_msg *msg);
-static inline void xe_sched_msg_lock(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
-{
- spin_lock(&sched->base.job_list_lock);
-}
+#define xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags) \
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->msg_lock, flags)
-static inline void xe_sched_msg_unlock(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
-{
- spin_unlock(&sched->base.job_list_lock);
-}
+#define xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags) \
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->msg_lock, flags)
static inline void xe_sched_stop(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
{
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h
index 6731b13da8bb..c8e0352ef941 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ struct xe_gpu_scheduler {
const struct xe_sched_backend_ops *ops;
/** @msgs: list of messages to be processed in @work_process_msg */
struct list_head msgs;
+ /** @msg_lock: Lock for messages */
+ spinlock_t msg_lock;
/** @work_process_msg: processes messages */
struct work_struct work_process_msg;
};
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
index 82071a0ec91e..3efd2000c0a2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
@@ -1704,14 +1704,15 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_suspend(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
{
struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
struct xe_sched_msg *msg = q->guc->static_msgs + STATIC_MSG_SUSPEND;
+ unsigned long flags;
if (exec_queue_killed_or_banned_or_wedged(q))
return -EINVAL;
- xe_sched_msg_lock(sched);
+ xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags);
if (guc_exec_queue_try_add_msg(q, msg, SUSPEND))
q->guc->suspend_pending = true;
- xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
+ xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -1751,30 +1752,32 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_resume(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
struct xe_sched_msg *msg = q->guc->static_msgs + STATIC_MSG_RESUME;
struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
+ unsigned long flags;
xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), !q->guc->suspend_pending);
- xe_sched_msg_lock(sched);
+ xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags);
guc_exec_queue_try_add_msg(q, msg, RESUME);
- xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
+ xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags);
}
static void guc_exec_queue_kill_user(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
{
struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
struct xe_sched_msg *msg = q->guc->static_msgs + STATIC_MSG_KILL_USER;
+ unsigned long flags;
if (exec_queue_extra_ref(q))
return;
set_exec_queue_banned(q);
- xe_sched_msg_lock(sched);
+ xe_sched_msg_lock(sched, flags);
if (guc_exec_queue_try_add_msg(q, msg, KILL_USER)) {
set_exec_queue_extra_ref(q);
xe_exec_queue_get(q);
}
- xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched);
+ xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched, flags);
}
static bool guc_exec_queue_reset_status(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-18 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-18 23:37 [RFC PATCH 00/29] UMD direct submission in Xe Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 01/29] dma-fence: Add dma_fence_preempt base class Matthew Brost
2024-11-20 13:31 ` Christian König
2024-11-20 17:36 ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-21 10:04 ` Christian König
2024-11-21 18:41 ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-22 10:56 ` Christian König
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 02/29] dma-fence: Add dma_fence_user_fence Matthew Brost
2024-11-20 13:38 ` Christian König
2024-11-20 22:50 ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-21 9:31 ` Christian König
2024-11-22 2:35 ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-22 10:28 ` Christian König
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 03/29] drm/xe: Use dma_fence_preempt base class Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 04/29] drm/xe: Allocate doorbells for UMD exec queues Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 05/29] drm/xe: Add doorbell ID to snapshot capture Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 06/29] drm/xe: Break submission ring out into its own BO Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 07/29] drm/xe: Break indirect ring state " Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 08/29] drm/xe: Clear GGTT in xe_bo_restore_kernel Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 09/29] FIXME: drm/xe: Add pad to ring and indirect state Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 10/29] drm/xe: Enable indirect ring on media GT Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 11/29] drm/xe: Don't add pinned mappings to VM bulk move Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 12/29] drm/xe: Add exec queue post init extension processing Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 13/29] drm/xe/mmap: Add mmap support for PCI memory barrier Matthew Brost
2024-11-19 10:00 ` Christian König
2024-11-19 11:57 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2024-11-19 12:42 ` Mrozek, Michal
2024-12-18 12:59 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 14/29] drm/xe: Add support for mmapping doorbells to user space Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 15/29] drm/xe: Add support for mmapping submission ring and indirect ring state " Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 16/29] drm/xe/uapi: Define UMD exec queue mapping uAPI Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 17/29] drm/xe: Add usermap exec queue extension Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 18/29] drm/xe: Drop EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_UMD_SUBMISSION flag Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 19/29] drm/xe: Do not allow usermap exec queues in exec IOCTL Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 20/29] drm/xe: Teach GuC backend to kill usermap queues Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 21/29] drm/xe: Enable preempt fences on " Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 22/29] drm/xe/uapi: Add uAPI to convert user semaphore to / from drm syncobj Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 23/29] drm/xe: Add user fence IRQ handler Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 24/29] drm/xe: Add xe_hw_fence_user_init Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 26/29] drm/xe: Always wait on preempt fences in vma_check_userptr Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 27/29] drm/xe: Teach xe_sync layer about drm_xe_semaphore Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 28/29] drm/xe: Add VM convert fence IOCTL Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCH 29/29] drm/xe: Add user fence TDR Matthew Brost
2024-11-18 23:55 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for UMD direct submission in Xe Patchwork
2024-11-18 23:56 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-18 23:57 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-11-19 0:15 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-19 0:17 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-19 0:19 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-11-19 0:39 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-19 11:44 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241118233757.2374041-26-matthew.brost@intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=kenneth.w.graunke@intel.com \
--cc=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
--cc=mihail.atanassov@arm.com \
--cc=shashank.sharma@amd.com \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox