Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/dmc_wl: Enable the debugfs only with enable_dmc_wl_debugfs=1
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:06:55 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250117220747.87927-5-gustavo.sousa@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250117220747.87927-1-gustavo.sousa@intel.com>

We use a spinlock to protect DMC wakelock debugfs data, since it is also
accessed by the core DMC wakelock logic. Taking the spinlock when the
debugfs is not in use introduces a small but unnecessary penalty.

Since the debugfs functionality is only expected to be used for, uh,
debugging sessions, let's protect it behind a module parameter
enable_dmc_wl_debugfs. That way, we only take the lock if the feature
was enabled in the first place.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c  |  5 +++++
 .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h  |  1 +
 .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl_debugfs.c  | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c
index c4f1ab43fc0c..bc36d1b0ef87 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c
@@ -133,6 +133,11 @@ intel_display_param_named_unsafe(enable_dmc_wl, int, 0400,
 	"(-1=use per-chip default, 0=disabled, 1=enabled, 2=match any register, 3=always locked) "
 	"Default: -1");
 
+intel_display_param_named_unsafe(enable_dmc_wl_debugfs, bool, 0400,
+	"Enable DMC wakelock debugfs"
+	"(0=disabled, 1=enabled) "
+	"Default: 0");
+
 __maybe_unused
 static void _param_print_bool(struct drm_printer *p, const char *driver_name,
 			      const char *name, bool val)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h
index 5317138e6044..cb7dc1bc6846 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct drm_printer;
 	param(bool, psr_safest_params, false, 0400) \
 	param(bool, enable_psr2_sel_fetch, true, 0400) \
 	param(int, enable_dmc_wl, -1, 0400) \
+	param(bool, enable_dmc_wl_debugfs, false, 0400) \
 
 #define MEMBER(T, member, ...) T member;
 struct intel_display_params {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl_debugfs.c
index 1493d296ac98..f4e4c7a5a730 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl_debugfs.c
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@
  * which exports a buffer of untracked register offsets and also allows extra
  * register offsets to be tracked by the driver.
  *
+ * The debugfs directory is only exported if the module parameter
+ * enable_dmc_wl_debugfs=1 is passed.
+ *
  * Untracked offsets
  * -----------------
  *
@@ -411,6 +414,9 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_debugfs_register(struct intel_display *display)
 {
 	struct dentry *dir;
 
+	if (!display->params.enable_dmc_wl_debugfs)
+		return;
+
 	if (!HAS_DMC_WAKELOCK(display))
 		return;
 
@@ -453,6 +459,9 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_debugfs_log_untracked(struct intel_display *display, u32 offse
 	struct intel_dmc_wl_dbg *dbg = &display->wl.dbg;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	if (!display->params.enable_dmc_wl_debugfs)
+		return;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&dbg->lock, flags);
 
 	if (!dbg->untracked.size)
@@ -479,9 +488,14 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_debugfs_log_untracked(struct intel_display *display, u32 offse
 bool intel_dmc_wl_debugfs_offset_in_extra_ranges(struct intel_display *display, u32 offset)
 {
 	struct intel_dmc_wl_dbg *dbg = &display->wl.dbg;
-	bool ret = false;
+	bool ret;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	if (!display->params.enable_dmc_wl_debugfs)
+		return false;
+
+	ret = false;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&dbg->lock, flags);
 
 	if (!dbg->extra_ranges)
-- 
2.48.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-17 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-17 22:06 [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915/dmc_wl: Introduce debugfs interface Gustavo Sousa
2025-01-17 22:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/dmc_wl: Pass offset instead of reg to range table iterator Gustavo Sousa
2025-01-22  8:23   ` Luca Coelho
2025-01-17 22:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/dmc_wl: Add debugfs for untracked offsets Gustavo Sousa
2025-01-22  9:06   ` Luca Coelho
2025-01-23 14:41     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-01-30  9:33       ` Luca Coelho
2025-01-23 16:11   ` Vivekanandan, Balasubramani
2025-01-23 16:41     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-01-30  8:54       ` Vivekanandan, Balasubramani
2025-01-27  9:47   ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-27 11:17     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-01-27 11:59       ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-27 12:55         ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-01-17 22:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/dmc_wl: Add extra_ranges debugfs Gustavo Sousa
2025-01-22 10:19   ` Luca Coelho
2025-01-23 15:52     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-01-30  9:18       ` Luca Coelho
2025-01-30  8:30   ` Vivekanandan, Balasubramani
2025-01-30  8:49     ` Vivekanandan, Balasubramani
2025-01-17 22:06 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2025-01-22 10:24   ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/dmc_wl: Enable the debugfs only with enable_dmc_wl_debugfs=1 Luca Coelho
2025-01-23 16:10     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-01-30  9:28       ` Luca Coelho
2025-01-27 12:01   ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-27 12:02     ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-27 13:24     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-01-27 13:35       ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-27 13:50         ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-01-27 14:40           ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-30  8:46   ` Vivekanandan, Balasubramani
2025-01-17 22:14 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/dmc_wl: Introduce debugfs interface Patchwork
2025-01-17 22:15 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-01-17 22:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-01-17 22:34 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-17 22:36 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-01-17 22:38 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-01-17 23:06 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-01-18 13:06 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250117220747.87927-5-gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
    --to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox