From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/14] drm/xe: Fix xe_display_fini() calls
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:23:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250206232333.2660325-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206232333.2660325-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
xe_display_fini() undoes things from xe_display_init() (technically from
intel_display_driver_probe()). Those `goto err` in xe_device_probe()
were wrong and being accumulated over time.
Commit 65e366ace5ee ("drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for
display") made it easier to fix now that we don't have xe_display_* init
calls spread on xe_device_probe(). Change xe_display_init() to use
devm_add_action_or_reset() that will finalize display in the right
order.
While at it, also add a newline and comment about calling
xe_driver_flr_fini.
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h | 2 --
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
index 651799c946ace..302f533af037d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
@@ -161,27 +161,29 @@ int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
return err;
}
-int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe)
+static void xe_display_fini(void *arg)
{
+ struct xe_device *xe = arg;
struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
- if (!xe->info.probe_display)
- return 0;
-
- return intel_display_driver_probe(display);
+ intel_hpd_poll_fini(xe);
+ intel_hdcp_component_fini(display);
+ intel_audio_deinit(display);
}
-void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe)
+int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe)
{
struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
+ int err;
if (!xe->info.probe_display)
- return;
+ return 0;
- intel_hpd_poll_fini(xe);
+ err = intel_display_driver_probe(display);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
- intel_hdcp_component_fini(display);
- intel_audio_deinit(display);
+ return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini, xe);
}
void xe_display_register(struct xe_device *xe)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
index e2a99624f7064..685dc74402fb8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe);
int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe);
-void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe);
void xe_display_register(struct xe_device *xe);
void xe_display_unregister(struct xe_device *xe);
@@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ static inline int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
static inline int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
static inline int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
-static inline void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe) {}
static inline void xe_display_register(struct xe_device *xe) {}
static inline void xe_display_unregister(struct xe_device *xe) {}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
index 36d7ffb3b4d90..ac3e344fe04ec 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
@@ -735,6 +735,7 @@ static int probe_has_flat_ccs(struct xe_device *xe)
"Flat CCS has been disabled in bios, May lead to performance impact");
xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -803,22 +804,26 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
err = xe_devcoredump_init(xe);
if (err)
return err;
+
+ /*
+ * From here on, if a step fails, make sure a Driver-FLR is triggereed
+ */
err = devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_driver_flr_fini, xe);
if (err)
return err;
err = probe_has_flat_ccs(xe);
if (err)
- goto err;
+ return err;
err = xe_vram_probe(xe);
if (err)
- goto err;
+ return err;
for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
err = xe_tile_init_noalloc(tile);
if (err)
- goto err;
+ return err;
}
/* Allocate and map stolen after potential VRAM resize */
@@ -832,17 +837,17 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
*/
err = xe_display_init_early(xe);
if (err)
- goto err;
+ return err;
for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
err = xe_tile_init(tile);
if (err)
- goto err;
+ return err;
}
err = xe_irq_install(xe);
if (err)
- goto err;
+ return err;
for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
last_gt = id;
@@ -902,8 +907,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
break;
}
-err:
- xe_display_fini(xe);
return err;
}
@@ -924,8 +927,6 @@ void xe_device_remove(struct xe_device *xe)
xe_device_remove_display(xe);
- xe_display_fini(xe);
-
xe_oa_fini(xe);
xe_heci_gsc_fini(xe);
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 23:23 [PATCH v2 00/14] Cleanup error handling on probe Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] drm/xe: Fix error handling in xe_irq_install() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] drm/xe: Fix xe_tile_init_noalloc() error propagation Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/xe: Stop ignoring errors from xe_ttm_stolen_mgr_init() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/xe: Remove leftover pxp comment Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:28 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] drm/xe: Add callback support for driver remove Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/xe: Cleanup unwind of gt initialization Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 0:21 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-02-07 0:45 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] drm/xe: Cleanup extra calls to xe_hw_fence_irq_finish() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] drm/xe: Move oa fini to xe_oa Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 21:22 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] drm/xe: Move drm_dev_unplug() out of display function Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] drm/xe/oa: Handle errors in xe_oa_register() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 21:38 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] drm/xe: Fail probe if xe_pmu_register() fails Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] drm/xe/hwmon: Fix mutex destroy Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 3:27 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 10:20 ` Matthew Auld
2025-02-07 13:59 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] drm/xe/hwmon: Stop ignoring errors on probe Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 0:59 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Cleanup error handling on probe (rev2) Patchwork
2025-02-07 1:00 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-07 1:01 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-07 1:17 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 1:20 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 1:21 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 1:41 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-07 7:27 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250206232333.2660325-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox