From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Francois Dugast" <francois.dugast@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/xe: Cleanup unwind of gt initialization
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:21:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca37bf12-1810-492b-bb38-bd41cafe686e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206232333.2660325-8-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
On 2/6/2025 3:23 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> The only thing in xe_gt_remove() that really needs to happen on the
> device remove callback is the xe_uc_remove(). That's because of the
> following call chain:
>
> xe_gt_remove()
> xe_uc_remove()
> xe_gsc_remove()
> xe_gsc_proxy_remove()
>
> Move xe_gsc_proxy_remove() to be handled as a xe_device_remove_action,
> so it's recorded when it should run during device removal. The rest can
> be handled normally by devm infra.
>
> Besides removing the deep call chain above, xe_device_probe() doesn't
> have to unwind the gt loop and it's also more in line with the
> xe_device_probe() style.
>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 21 +----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c | 9 -----
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c | 63 +++++++++++++++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_types.h | 3 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 35 ++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c | 13 -------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.h | 1 -
> 10 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 5fc4e696262f9..09288558e4e44 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -744,7 +744,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> struct xe_tile *tile;
> struct xe_gt *gt;
> int err;
> - u8 last_gt;
> u8 id;
>
> xe->probing = true;
> @@ -855,18 +854,16 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> return err;
>
> for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> - last_gt = id;
> -
> err = xe_gt_init(gt);
> if (err)
> - goto err_fini_gt;
> + return err;
> }
>
> xe_heci_gsc_init(xe);
unrelated to this patch, but still tied to probe failures: AFAICS we
don't call xe_heci_gsc_fini when the probe fails after this point.
I'm not 100% sure, but it doesn't look like this is intentional for
survivability mode (because that one has its own xe_heci_gsc_init/fini
calls), so maybe xe_heci_gsc_fini is another candidate for using a
remove_action callback? I don't think we can leave the child device
cleanup to a devm call.
>
> err = xe_oa_init(xe);
> if (err)
> - goto err_fini_gt;
> + return err;
>
> err = xe_display_init(xe);
> if (err)
> @@ -905,14 +902,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> err_fini_oa:
> xe_oa_fini(xe);
>
> -err_fini_gt:
> - for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> - if (id < last_gt)
> - xe_gt_remove(gt);
> - else
> - break;
> - }
> -
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -978,9 +967,6 @@ static void xe_device_remove_display(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> void xe_device_remove(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> - struct xe_gt *gt;
> - u8 id;
> -
> xe_oa_unregister(xe);
>
> xe_device_remove_display(xe);
> @@ -989,9 +975,6 @@ void xe_device_remove(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> xe_heci_gsc_fini(xe);
>
> - for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> - xe_gt_remove(gt);
> -
> xe_device_call_remove_actions(xe);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
> index 1eb791ddc375c..fd41113f85725 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
> @@ -555,15 +555,6 @@ void xe_gsc_wait_for_worker_completion(struct xe_gsc *gsc)
> flush_work(&gsc->work);
> }
>
> -/**
> - * xe_gsc_remove() - Clean up the GSC structures before driver removal
> - * @gsc: the GSC uC
> - */
> -void xe_gsc_remove(struct xe_gsc *gsc)
> -{
> - xe_gsc_proxy_remove(gsc);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * wa_14015076503: if the GSC FW is loaded, we need to alert it before doing a
> * GSC engine reset by writing a notification bit in the GS1 register and then
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.h
> index e282b9ef6ec4d..d99f66c38075c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.h
> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ int xe_gsc_init(struct xe_gsc *gsc);
> int xe_gsc_init_post_hwconfig(struct xe_gsc *gsc);
> void xe_gsc_wait_for_worker_completion(struct xe_gsc *gsc);
> void xe_gsc_load_start(struct xe_gsc *gsc);
> -void xe_gsc_remove(struct xe_gsc *gsc);
> void xe_gsc_hwe_irq_handler(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, u16 intr_vec);
>
> void xe_gsc_wa_14015076503(struct xe_gt *gt, bool prep);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c
> index 24cc6a4f9a96a..0da33d5e9b1c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c
> @@ -423,6 +423,34 @@ static int proxy_channel_alloc(struct xe_gsc *gsc)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void xe_gsc_proxy_remove(struct xe_device_remove_action *ra)
> +{
> + struct xe_gsc *gsc = container_of(ra, struct xe_gsc, proxy.remove_action);
> + struct xe_gt *gt = gsc_to_gt(gsc);
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> + unsigned int fw_ref = 0;
> +
> + if (!gsc->proxy.component_added)
> + return;
> +
> + /* disable HECI2 IRQs */
> + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> + fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
> + if (!fw_ref)
> + xe_gt_err(gt, "failed to get forcewake to disable GSC interrupts\n");
> +
> + /* try do disable irq even if forcewake failed */
> + gsc_proxy_irq_toggle(gsc, false);
> +
> + xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> + xe_gsc_wait_for_worker_completion(gsc);
> +
> + component_del(xe->drm.dev, &xe_gsc_proxy_component_ops);
> + gsc->proxy.component_added = false;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * xe_gsc_proxy_init() - init objects and MEI component required by GSC proxy
> * @gsc: the GSC uC
> @@ -461,43 +489,12 @@ int xe_gsc_proxy_init(struct xe_gsc *gsc)
> }
>
> gsc->proxy.component_added = true;
> -
> - /* the component must be removed before unload, so can't use drmm for cleanup */
> + xe_device_add_remove_action(xe, &gsc->proxy.remove_action,
> + xe_gsc_proxy_remove);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * xe_gsc_proxy_remove() - remove the GSC proxy MEI component
> - * @gsc: the GSC uC
> - */
> -void xe_gsc_proxy_remove(struct xe_gsc *gsc)
> -{
> - struct xe_gt *gt = gsc_to_gt(gsc);
> - struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> - unsigned int fw_ref = 0;
> -
> - if (!gsc->proxy.component_added)
> - return;
> -
> - /* disable HECI2 IRQs */
> - xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> - fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
> - if (!fw_ref)
> - xe_gt_err(gt, "failed to get forcewake to disable GSC interrupts\n");
> -
> - /* try do disable irq even if forcewake failed */
> - gsc_proxy_irq_toggle(gsc, false);
> -
> - xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
> - xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> -
> - xe_gsc_wait_for_worker_completion(gsc);
> -
> - component_del(xe->drm.dev, &xe_gsc_proxy_component_ops);
> - gsc->proxy.component_added = false;
> -}
> -
> /**
> * xe_gsc_proxy_start() - start the proxy by submitting the first request
> * @gsc: the GSC uC
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.h
> index c511ade6b8637..fdef56995cd43 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.h
> @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ struct xe_gsc;
>
> int xe_gsc_proxy_init(struct xe_gsc *gsc);
> bool xe_gsc_proxy_init_done(struct xe_gsc *gsc);
> -void xe_gsc_proxy_remove(struct xe_gsc *gsc);
> int xe_gsc_proxy_start(struct xe_gsc *gsc);
>
> int xe_gsc_proxy_request_handler(struct xe_gsc *gsc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_types.h
> index 5926de20214c8..3649239f19622 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_types.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> #include "xe_uc_fw_types.h"
> +#include "xe_device_types.h"
>
> struct xe_bo;
> struct xe_exec_queue;
> @@ -57,6 +58,8 @@ struct xe_gsc {
> struct mutex mutex;
> /** @proxy.component_added: whether the component has been added */
> bool component_added;
> + /** @proxy.remove_action */
nit: should this have a description?
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Daniele
> + struct xe_device_remove_action remove_action;
> /** @proxy.bo: object to store message to and from the GSC */
> struct xe_bo *bo;
> /** @proxy.to_gsc: map of the memory used to send messages to the GSC */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index 9fb8f1e678dc8..c33040278e1aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> @@ -141,26 +141,6 @@ static void xe_gt_disable_host_l2_vram(struct xe_gt *gt)
> xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
> }
>
> -/**
> - * xe_gt_remove() - Clean up the GT structures before driver removal
> - * @gt: the GT object
> - *
> - * This function should only act on objects/structures that must be cleaned
> - * before the driver removal callback is complete and therefore can't be
> - * deferred to a drmm action.
> - */
> -void xe_gt_remove(struct xe_gt *gt)
> -{
> - int i;
> -
> - xe_uc_remove(>->uc);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX; ++i)
> - xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(>->fence_irq[i]);
> -
> - xe_gt_disable_host_l2_vram(gt);
> -}
> -
> static void gt_reset_worker(struct work_struct *w);
>
> static int emit_nop_job(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> @@ -583,6 +563,17 @@ int xe_gt_init_hwconfig(struct xe_gt *gt)
> return err;
> }
>
> +static void xe_gt_fini(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt = arg;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX; ++i)
> + xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(>->fence_irq[i]);
> +
> + xe_gt_disable_host_l2_vram(gt);
> +}
> +
> int xe_gt_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> int err;
> @@ -595,6 +586,10 @@ int xe_gt_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> xe_hw_fence_irq_init(>->fence_irq[i]);
> }
>
> + err = devm_add_action_or_reset(gt_to_xe(gt)->drm.dev, xe_gt_fini, gt);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> err = xe_gt_pagefault_init(gt);
> if (err)
> return err;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h
> index e504cc33ade4f..187fa6490eafc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ int xe_gt_resume(struct xe_gt *gt);
> void xe_gt_reset_async(struct xe_gt *gt);
> void xe_gt_sanitize(struct xe_gt *gt);
> int xe_gt_sanitize_freq(struct xe_gt *gt);
> -void xe_gt_remove(struct xe_gt *gt);
>
> /**
> * xe_gt_wait_for_reset - wait for gt's async reset to finalize.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
> index 0d073a9987c2e..d8167e818280b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.c
> @@ -288,19 +288,6 @@ int xe_uc_suspend(struct xe_uc *uc)
> return xe_guc_suspend(&uc->guc);
> }
>
> -/**
> - * xe_uc_remove() - Clean up the UC structures before driver removal
> - * @uc: the UC object
> - *
> - * This function should only act on objects/structures that must be cleaned
> - * before the driver removal callback is complete and therefore can't be
> - * deferred to a drmm action.
> - */
> -void xe_uc_remove(struct xe_uc *uc)
> -{
> - xe_gsc_remove(&uc->gsc);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * xe_uc_declare_wedged() - Declare UC wedged
> * @uc: the UC object
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.h
> index 506517c113339..3813c1ede450e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc.h
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ void xe_uc_stop(struct xe_uc *uc);
> int xe_uc_start(struct xe_uc *uc);
> int xe_uc_suspend(struct xe_uc *uc);
> int xe_uc_sanitize_reset(struct xe_uc *uc);
> -void xe_uc_remove(struct xe_uc *uc);
> void xe_uc_declare_wedged(struct xe_uc *uc);
>
> #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-07 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 23:23 [PATCH v2 00/14] Cleanup error handling on probe Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] drm/xe: Fix xe_display_fini() calls Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] drm/xe: Fix error handling in xe_irq_install() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] drm/xe: Fix xe_tile_init_noalloc() error propagation Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/xe: Stop ignoring errors from xe_ttm_stolen_mgr_init() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/xe: Remove leftover pxp comment Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:28 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] drm/xe: Add callback support for driver remove Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/xe: Cleanup unwind of gt initialization Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 0:21 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2025-02-07 0:45 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] drm/xe: Cleanup extra calls to xe_hw_fence_irq_finish() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] drm/xe: Move oa fini to xe_oa Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 21:22 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] drm/xe: Move drm_dev_unplug() out of display function Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] drm/xe/oa: Handle errors in xe_oa_register() Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 21:38 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] drm/xe: Fail probe if xe_pmu_register() fails Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] drm/xe/hwmon: Fix mutex destroy Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 3:27 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 10:20 ` Matthew Auld
2025-02-07 13:59 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-06 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] drm/xe/hwmon: Stop ignoring errors on probe Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-07 0:59 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Cleanup error handling on probe (rev2) Patchwork
2025-02-07 1:00 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-07 1:01 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-07 1:17 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 1:20 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 1:21 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-07 1:41 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-07 7:27 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ca37bf12-1810-492b-bb38-bd41cafe686e@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox