From: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, jani.nikula@intel.com,
Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dpll: Accept intel_display as argument for shared_dpll_init
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 18:09:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250210123950.3476620-9-suraj.kandpal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250210123950.3476620-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Use intel_display as an argument for intel_shared_dpll_init() and
replace drm_i915_private in function wherever possible.
While at it prefer using display->platform.xx over IS_PLATFORM.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
---
.../drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 49 ++++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 3 +-
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
index 75b865bde1b9..fb8d24599061 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ int intel_display_driver_probe_nogem(struct intel_display *display)
}
intel_plane_possible_crtcs_init(display);
- intel_shared_dpll_init(i915);
+ intel_shared_dpll_init(display);
intel_fdi_pll_freq_update(i915);
intel_update_czclk(i915);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 1d69fa8b2ad0..42cb614855db 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2051,8 +2051,8 @@ static void bxt_ddi_pll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
{
const struct bxt_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &dpll_hw_state->bxt;
enum port port = (enum port)pll->info->id; /* 1:1 port->PLL mapping */
- enum dpio_phy phy;
- enum dpio_channel ch;
+ enum dpio_phy phy = DPIO_PHY0;
+ enum dpio_channel ch = DPIO_CH0;
u32 temp;
bxt_port_to_phy_channel(display, port, &phy, &ch);
@@ -4315,40 +4315,41 @@ static const struct intel_dpll_mgr adlp_pll_mgr = {
/**
* intel_shared_dpll_init - Initialize shared DPLLs
- * @i915: i915 device
+ * @display: intel_display device
*
- * Initialize shared DPLLs for @i915.
+ * Initialize shared DPLLs for @display.
*/
-void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct intel_display *display)
{
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
const struct intel_dpll_mgr *dpll_mgr = NULL;
const struct dpll_info *dpll_info;
int i;
- mutex_init(&i915->display.dpll.lock);
+ mutex_init(&display->dpll.lock);
- if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14 || IS_DG2(i915))
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 14 || display->platform.dg2)
/* No shared DPLLs on DG2; port PLLs are part of the PHY */
dpll_mgr = NULL;
- else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915))
+ else if (display->platform.alderlake_p)
dpll_mgr = &adlp_pll_mgr;
- else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_S(i915))
+ else if (display->platform.alderlake_s)
dpll_mgr = &adls_pll_mgr;
- else if (IS_DG1(i915))
+ else if (display->platform.dg1)
dpll_mgr = &dg1_pll_mgr;
- else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915))
+ else if (display->platform.rocketlake)
dpll_mgr = &rkl_pll_mgr;
- else if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
+ else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12)
dpll_mgr = &tgl_pll_mgr;
- else if (IS_JASPERLAKE(i915) || IS_ELKHARTLAKE(i915))
+ else if (display->platform.jasperlake || display->platform.elkhartlake)
dpll_mgr = &ehl_pll_mgr;
- else if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11)
+ else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 11)
dpll_mgr = &icl_pll_mgr;
- else if (IS_GEMINILAKE(i915) || IS_BROXTON(i915))
+ else if (display->platform.geminilake || display->platform.broxton)
dpll_mgr = &bxt_pll_mgr;
- else if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) == 9)
+ else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) == 9)
dpll_mgr = &skl_pll_mgr;
- else if (HAS_DDI(i915))
+ else if (HAS_DDI(display))
dpll_mgr = &hsw_pll_mgr;
else if (HAS_PCH_IBX(i915) || HAS_PCH_CPT(i915))
dpll_mgr = &pch_pll_mgr;
@@ -4359,20 +4360,20 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
dpll_info = dpll_mgr->dpll_info;
for (i = 0; dpll_info[i].name; i++) {
- if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm,
- i >= ARRAY_SIZE(i915->display.dpll.shared_dplls)))
+ if (drm_WARN_ON(display->drm,
+ i >= ARRAY_SIZE(display->dpll.shared_dplls)))
break;
/* must fit into unsigned long bitmask on 32bit */
- if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, dpll_info[i].id >= 32))
+ if (drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, dpll_info[i].id >= 32))
break;
- i915->display.dpll.shared_dplls[i].info = &dpll_info[i];
- i915->display.dpll.shared_dplls[i].index = i;
+ display->dpll.shared_dplls[i].info = &dpll_info[i];
+ display->dpll.shared_dplls[i].index = i;
}
- i915->display.dpll.mgr = dpll_mgr;
- i915->display.dpll.num_shared_dpll = i;
+ display->dpll.mgr = dpll_mgr;
+ display->dpll.num_shared_dpll = i;
}
/**
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
index 3d988f17f31d..caffb084830c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
((__pll) = &(__display)->dpll.shared_dplls[(__i)]) ; (__i)++)
enum tc_port;
-struct drm_i915_private;
struct drm_printer;
struct intel_atomic_state;
struct intel_crtc;
@@ -422,7 +421,7 @@ bool intel_dpll_get_hw_state(struct intel_display *display,
void intel_enable_shared_dpll(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
void intel_disable_shared_dpll(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
void intel_shared_dpll_swap_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
-void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
+void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct intel_display *display);
void intel_dpll_update_ref_clks(struct intel_display *display);
void intel_dpll_readout_hw_state(struct intel_display *display);
void intel_dpll_sanitize_state(struct intel_display *display);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-10 12:39 [PATCH 0/9] drm_i915_private to intel_display cleanup Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-10 12:39 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/display_debug_fs: Use intel_display wherever possible Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-10 12:39 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/display_debug_fs: Prefer using display->platform Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-10 12:39 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/dpll: Change param to intel_display in for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-10 12:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for dpll dump and compare hw state Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-10 12:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display possible in shared_dpll_mgr hooks Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-10 12:39 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for asserting pll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-10 12:39 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for update_refclk hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-10 12:39 ` Suraj Kandpal [this message]
2025-02-10 12:39 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/dpll: Replace all other leftover drm_i915_private Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-10 12:52 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm_i915_private to intel_display cleanup Patchwork
2025-02-10 12:53 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-10 12:54 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-10 13:10 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-10 13:13 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-10 13:14 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-10 13:34 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-10 17:26 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-11 10:48 [PATCH 0/9] " Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dpll: Accept intel_display as argument for shared_dpll_init Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:14 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 14:23 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-11 16:57 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-12 7:35 ` Kandpal, Suraj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250210123950.3476620-9-suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--to=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox