From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dpll: Accept intel_display as argument for shared_dpll_init
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:14:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jz9w1v42.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211104857.3501566-9-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> Use intel_display as an argument for intel_shared_dpll_init() and
> replace drm_i915_private in function wherever possible.
> While at it prefer using display->platform.xx over IS_PLATFORM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 49 ++++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 3 +-
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> index 978f530c810e..852f1129a058 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_driver.c
> @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ int intel_display_driver_probe_nogem(struct intel_display *display)
> }
>
> intel_plane_possible_crtcs_init(display);
> - intel_shared_dpll_init(i915);
> + intel_shared_dpll_init(display);
> intel_fdi_pll_freq_update(i915);
>
> intel_update_czclk(i915);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index f94da1ffc8ce..26b6b9372fa3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2042,8 +2042,8 @@ static void bxt_ddi_pll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> {
> const struct bxt_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &dpll_hw_state->bxt;
> enum port port = (enum port)pll->info->id; /* 1:1 port->PLL mapping */
> - enum dpio_phy phy;
> - enum dpio_channel ch;
> + enum dpio_phy phy = DPIO_PHY0;
> + enum dpio_channel ch = DPIO_CH0;
Unrelated change, please drop.
With that fixed,
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> u32 temp;
>
> bxt_port_to_phy_channel(display, port, &phy, &ch);
> @@ -4302,40 +4302,41 @@ static const struct intel_dpll_mgr adlp_pll_mgr = {
>
> /**
> * intel_shared_dpll_init - Initialize shared DPLLs
> - * @i915: i915 device
> + * @display: intel_display device
> *
> - * Initialize shared DPLLs for @i915.
> + * Initialize shared DPLLs for @display.
> */
> -void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
> const struct intel_dpll_mgr *dpll_mgr = NULL;
> const struct dpll_info *dpll_info;
> int i;
>
> - mutex_init(&i915->display.dpll.lock);
> + mutex_init(&display->dpll.lock);
>
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14 || IS_DG2(i915))
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 14 || display->platform.dg2)
> /* No shared DPLLs on DG2; port PLLs are part of the PHY */
> dpll_mgr = NULL;
> - else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915))
> + else if (display->platform.alderlake_p)
> dpll_mgr = &adlp_pll_mgr;
> - else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_S(i915))
> + else if (display->platform.alderlake_s)
> dpll_mgr = &adls_pll_mgr;
> - else if (IS_DG1(i915))
> + else if (display->platform.dg1)
> dpll_mgr = &dg1_pll_mgr;
> - else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915))
> + else if (display->platform.rocketlake)
> dpll_mgr = &rkl_pll_mgr;
> - else if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
> + else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12)
> dpll_mgr = &tgl_pll_mgr;
> - else if (IS_JASPERLAKE(i915) || IS_ELKHARTLAKE(i915))
> + else if (display->platform.jasperlake || display->platform.elkhartlake)
> dpll_mgr = &ehl_pll_mgr;
> - else if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11)
> + else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 11)
> dpll_mgr = &icl_pll_mgr;
> - else if (IS_GEMINILAKE(i915) || IS_BROXTON(i915))
> + else if (display->platform.geminilake || display->platform.broxton)
> dpll_mgr = &bxt_pll_mgr;
> - else if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) == 9)
> + else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) == 9)
> dpll_mgr = &skl_pll_mgr;
> - else if (HAS_DDI(i915))
> + else if (HAS_DDI(display))
> dpll_mgr = &hsw_pll_mgr;
> else if (HAS_PCH_IBX(i915) || HAS_PCH_CPT(i915))
> dpll_mgr = &pch_pll_mgr;
> @@ -4346,20 +4347,20 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> dpll_info = dpll_mgr->dpll_info;
>
> for (i = 0; dpll_info[i].name; i++) {
> - if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm,
> - i >= ARRAY_SIZE(i915->display.dpll.shared_dplls)))
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(display->drm,
> + i >= ARRAY_SIZE(display->dpll.shared_dplls)))
> break;
>
> /* must fit into unsigned long bitmask on 32bit */
> - if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, dpll_info[i].id >= 32))
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, dpll_info[i].id >= 32))
> break;
>
> - i915->display.dpll.shared_dplls[i].info = &dpll_info[i];
> - i915->display.dpll.shared_dplls[i].index = i;
> + display->dpll.shared_dplls[i].info = &dpll_info[i];
> + display->dpll.shared_dplls[i].index = i;
> }
>
> - i915->display.dpll.mgr = dpll_mgr;
> - i915->display.dpll.num_shared_dpll = i;
> + display->dpll.mgr = dpll_mgr;
> + display->dpll.num_shared_dpll = i;
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> index 3d988f17f31d..caffb084830c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
> ((__pll) = &(__display)->dpll.shared_dplls[(__i)]) ; (__i)++)
>
> enum tc_port;
> -struct drm_i915_private;
> struct drm_printer;
> struct intel_atomic_state;
> struct intel_crtc;
> @@ -422,7 +421,7 @@ bool intel_dpll_get_hw_state(struct intel_display *display,
> void intel_enable_shared_dpll(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> void intel_disable_shared_dpll(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> void intel_shared_dpll_swap_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> -void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct intel_display *display);
> void intel_dpll_update_ref_clks(struct intel_display *display);
> void intel_dpll_readout_hw_state(struct intel_display *display);
> void intel_dpll_sanitize_state(struct intel_display *display);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 10:48 [PATCH 0/9] drm_i915_private to intel_display cleanup Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/display_debug_fs: Use intel_display wherever possible Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 12:51 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 12:52 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/display_debug_fs: Prefer using display->platform Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 12:53 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/dpll: Change param to intel_display in for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 12:56 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for dpll dump and compare hw state Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 12:59 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display possible in shared_dpll_mgr hooks Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:10 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for asserting pll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:12 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for update_refclk hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:12 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dpll: Accept intel_display as argument for shared_dpll_init Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:14 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-02-11 14:23 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-11 16:57 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-12 7:35 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/dpll: Replace all other leftover drm_i915_private Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:17 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 11:50 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm_i915_private to intel_display cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2025-02-11 11:51 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-11 11:52 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:09 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:10 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:11 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:31 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-11 20:46 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-12 9:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] drm_i915_private to intel_display cleanup Kandpal, Suraj
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-10 12:39 Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-10 12:39 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dpll: Accept intel_display as argument for shared_dpll_init Suraj Kandpal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jz9w1v42.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox