Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, jani.nikula@intel.com,
	Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for dpll dump and compare hw state
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:18:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250211104857.3501566-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211104857.3501566-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>

Lets use intel_display for dpll dump and compare hw state. This also
helps elimanate drm_i915_private dependency from i915_shared_dplls_info
in display_debug_fs.

Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c     |  8 ++++----
 .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c |  3 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c    | 16 ++++++++--------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h    |  4 ++--
 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c
index ecd0d9853c60..599ddce96371 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c
@@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ void intel_crtc_state_dump(const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
 			   struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 			   const char *context)
 {
+	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(pipe_config);
 	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(pipe_config->uapi.crtc);
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
 	const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state;
@@ -340,7 +341,7 @@ void intel_crtc_state_dump(const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
 		   pipe_config->ips_enabled, pipe_config->double_wide,
 		   pipe_config->has_drrs);
 
-	intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(i915, &p, &pipe_config->dpll_hw_state);
+	intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(display, &p, &pipe_config->dpll_hw_state);
 
 	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
 		drm_printf(&p, "cgm_mode: 0x%x gamma_mode: 0x%x gamma_enable: %d csc_enable: %d\n",
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 9f8a8c94cf4c..5f4b1d8eed3e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -5348,14 +5348,14 @@ pipe_config_pll_mismatch(struct drm_printer *p, bool fastset,
 			 const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *a,
 			 const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *b)
 {
-	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
+	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc);
 
 	pipe_config_mismatch(p, fastset, crtc, name, " "); /* stupid -Werror=format-zero-length */
 
 	drm_printf(p, "expected:\n");
-	intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(i915, p, a);
+	intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(display, p, a);
 	drm_printf(p, "found:\n");
-	intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(i915, p, b);
+	intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(display, p, b);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -5495,7 +5495,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
 } while (0)
 
 #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_PLL(name) do { \
-	if (!intel_dpll_compare_hw_state(dev_priv, &current_config->name, \
+	if (!intel_dpll_compare_hw_state(display, &current_config->name, \
 					 &pipe_config->name)) { \
 		pipe_config_pll_mismatch(&p, fastset, crtc, __stringify(name), \
 					 &current_config->name, \
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
index 87e6f4000101..970b8078db8b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
@@ -630,7 +630,6 @@ static int i915_display_capabilities(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 
 static int i915_shared_dplls_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
-	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
 	struct intel_display *display = node_to_intel_display(m->private);
 	struct drm_printer p = drm_seq_file_printer(m);
 	struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
@@ -649,7 +648,7 @@ static int i915_shared_dplls_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 			   pll->state.pipe_mask, pll->active_mask,
 			   str_yes_no(pll->on));
 		drm_printf(&p, " tracked hardware state:\n");
-		intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(dev_priv, &p, &pll->state.hw_state);
+		intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(display, &p, &pll->state.hw_state);
 	}
 	drm_modeset_unlock_all(display->drm);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 171d16e91c61..ee4e263ce999 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -4592,18 +4592,18 @@ void intel_dpll_sanitize_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 
 /**
  * intel_dpll_dump_hw_state - dump hw_state
- * @i915: i915 drm device
+ * @display: intel_display structure
  * @p: where to print the state to
  * @dpll_hw_state: hw state to be dumped
  *
  * Dumo out the relevant values in @dpll_hw_state.
  */
-void intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+void intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(struct intel_display *display,
 			      struct drm_printer *p,
 			      const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
 {
-	if (i915->display.dpll.mgr) {
-		i915->display.dpll.mgr->dump_hw_state(p, dpll_hw_state);
+	if (display->dpll.mgr) {
+		display->dpll.mgr->dump_hw_state(p, dpll_hw_state);
 	} else {
 		/* fallback for platforms that don't use the shared dpll
 		 * infrastructure
@@ -4614,7 +4614,7 @@ void intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 
 /**
  * intel_dpll_compare_hw_state - compare the two states
- * @i915: i915 drm device
+ * @display: intel_display structure
  * @a: first DPLL hw state
  * @b: second DPLL hw state
  *
@@ -4622,12 +4622,12 @@ void intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
  *
  * Returns: true if the states are equal, false if the differ
  */
-bool intel_dpll_compare_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+bool intel_dpll_compare_hw_state(struct intel_display *display,
 				 const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *a,
 				 const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *b)
 {
-	if (i915->display.dpll.mgr) {
-		return i915->display.dpll.mgr->compare_hw_state(a, b);
+	if (display->dpll.mgr) {
+		return display->dpll.mgr->compare_hw_state(a, b);
 	} else {
 		/* fallback for platforms that don't use the shared dpll
 		 * infrastructure
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
index 382bdf8f0b65..42379494f347 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
@@ -427,10 +427,10 @@ void intel_dpll_update_ref_clks(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
 void intel_dpll_readout_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
 void intel_dpll_sanitize_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
 
-void intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+void intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(struct intel_display *display,
 			      struct drm_printer *p,
 			      const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state);
-bool intel_dpll_compare_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+bool intel_dpll_compare_hw_state(struct intel_display *display,
 				 const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *a,
 				 const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *b);
 enum intel_dpll_id icl_tc_port_to_pll_id(enum tc_port tc_port);
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-11 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-11 10:48 [PATCH 0/9] drm_i915_private to intel_display cleanup Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/display_debug_fs: Use intel_display wherever possible Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 12:51   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 12:52   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/display_debug_fs: Prefer using display->platform Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 12:53   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/dpll: Change param to intel_display in for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 12:56   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` Suraj Kandpal [this message]
2025-02-11 12:59   ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for dpll dump and compare hw state Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display possible in shared_dpll_mgr hooks Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:10   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for asserting pll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:12   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for update_refclk hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:12   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dpll: Accept intel_display as argument for shared_dpll_init Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:14   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 14:23     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-11 16:57       ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-12  7:35         ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-11 10:48 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/dpll: Replace all other leftover drm_i915_private Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-11 13:17   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-11 11:50 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm_i915_private to intel_display cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2025-02-11 11:51 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-11 11:52 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:09 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:10 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:11 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-11 12:31 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-11 20:46 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-12  9:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] drm_i915_private to intel_display cleanup Kandpal, Suraj
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-10 12:39 Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-10 12:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for dpll dump and compare hw state Suraj Kandpal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250211104857.3501566-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    --to=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox