Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/dp: Clear DPCD training pattern before transmitting the idle pattern
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:26:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250224172645.15763-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250224172645.15763-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

We are supposed to switch off the training pattern in DPCD before
we start transmitting the idle pattern. For LTTPRs we do that
correctly, but for the sink DPRX we only do this correctly
for some platforms.

On pre-HSW (where we don't implement the .set_idle_link_train()
hook), we directly switch from transmitting the training pattern
to normal pixel transmission (the hardware should guarantee that
the minimum number of required idle patters will be transmitted
during this transition).

For HSW+ we start transmitting the idle pattern earlier, and only
switch off the DPCD training pattern after we switch from the idle
pattern to normal pixel transmission. Adjust the code to disable
the DPCD training pattern before we start transmitting the idle
patter.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c
index 11953b03bb6a..b2fb641e4e96 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c
@@ -1125,7 +1125,9 @@ void intel_dp_stop_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 {
 	intel_dp->link_trained = true;
 
-	intel_dp_disable_dpcd_training_pattern(intel_dp, DP_PHY_DPRX);
+	if (!intel_dp->set_idle_link_train)
+		intel_dp_disable_dpcd_training_pattern(intel_dp, DP_PHY_DPRX);
+
 	intel_dp_program_link_training_pattern(intel_dp, crtc_state, DP_PHY_DPRX,
 					       DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_DISABLE);
 
@@ -1357,8 +1359,10 @@ intel_dp_link_train_all_phys(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	if (ret)
 		ret = intel_dp_link_train_phy(intel_dp, crtc_state, DP_PHY_DPRX);
 
-	if (intel_dp->set_idle_link_train)
+	if (intel_dp->set_idle_link_train) {
+		intel_dp_disable_dpcd_training_pattern(intel_dp, DP_PHY_DPRX);
 		intel_dp->set_idle_link_train(intel_dp, crtc_state);
+	}
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.45.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-24 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-24 17:26 [PATCH 0/9] drm/i915/dp: Implement POST_LT_ADJ_REQ Ville Syrjala
2025-02-24 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/dp: Add definitions for POST_LT_ADJ training sequence Ville Syrjala
2025-02-25 15:55   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-27 20:42   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2025-06-16 16:28     ` Imre Deak
2025-02-24 17:26 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/dp: Add POST_LT_ADJ_REQ helpers Ville Syrjala
2025-02-24 17:26 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2025-02-24 17:26 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dp: Have intel_dp_get_adjust_train() tell us if anything changed Ville Syrjala
2025-02-24 17:26 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/dp: Implement the POST_LT_ADJ_REQ sequence Ville Syrjala
2025-06-16 16:30   ` Imre Deak
2025-02-24 17:26 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/dp: Move intel_dp_training_pattern() Ville Syrjala
2025-02-24 17:26 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/dp: Implement .set_idle_link_train() for everyone Ville Syrjala
2025-06-16 16:31   ` Imre Deak
2025-02-24 17:26 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Make .set_idle_link_train() mandatory Ville Syrjala
2025-02-24 17:26 ` [PATCH 9/9] hax: drm/i915: Disable TPS4 support to force POST_LT_ADJ_REQ usage Ville Syrjala
2025-02-25  1:06 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/dp: Implement POST_LT_ADJ_REQ Patchwork
2025-02-25  1:06 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-25  1:07 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-25  1:24 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-25  1:26 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-25  1:28 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-25  1:46 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-25  4:34 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-27 22:35 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/dp: Implement POST_LT_ADJ_REQ (rev2) Patchwork
2025-02-27 22:35 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-27 22:37 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-27 22:53 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-27 22:56 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-27 22:57 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-27 23:15 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-28  3:23 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-06-16 16:25 ` [PATCH 0/9] drm/i915/dp: Implement POST_LT_ADJ_REQ Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250224172645.15763-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox