Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/i915/psr: New interface adding PSR idle poll into dsb commit
Date: Fri,  5 Sep 2025 10:27:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250905072708.2659411-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905072708.2659411-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com>

We are currently observing crc failures after we started using dsb for PSR
updates as well. This seems to happen because PSR HW is still sending
couple of updates using old framebuffers on wake-up.

This patch is preparing to fix that by adding interface which can be used
to add poll ensuring PSR HW is idle into dsb commit.

v3: add intel_dsb as a parameter to intel_psr_wait_for_idle_dsb
v2: add pass crtc_state->dsb_commit as parameter

Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
index eae1eedbbb26..1aa4a127afaf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #include "intel_dmc.h"
 #include "intel_dp.h"
 #include "intel_dp_aux.h"
+#include "intel_dsb.h"
 #include "intel_frontbuffer.h"
 #include "intel_hdmi.h"
 #include "intel_psr.h"
@@ -3006,7 +3007,8 @@ void intel_psr_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 #define PSR_IDLE_TIMEOUT_MS 50
 
 static int
-_psr2_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
+_psr2_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
+				   struct intel_dsb *dsb)
 {
 	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(new_crtc_state);
 	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = new_crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
@@ -3016,6 +3018,13 @@ _psr2_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state
 	 * As all higher states has bit 4 of PSR2 state set we can just wait for
 	 * EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_DEEP_SLEEP to be cleared.
 	 */
+	if (dsb) {
+		intel_dsb_poll(dsb, EDP_PSR2_STATUS(display, cpu_transcoder),
+			       EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_DEEP_SLEEP, 0, 200,
+			       PSR_IDLE_TIMEOUT_MS * 1000 / 200);
+		return true;
+	}
+
 	return intel_de_wait_for_clear(display,
 				       EDP_PSR2_STATUS(display, cpu_transcoder),
 				       EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_DEEP_SLEEP,
@@ -3023,11 +3032,19 @@ _psr2_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state
 }
 
 static int
-_psr1_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
+_psr1_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
+				   struct intel_dsb *dsb)
 {
 	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(new_crtc_state);
 	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = new_crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
 
+	if (dsb) {
+		intel_dsb_poll(dsb, psr_status_reg(display, cpu_transcoder),
+			       EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK, 0, 200,
+			       PSR_IDLE_TIMEOUT_MS * 1000 / 200);
+		return true;
+	}
+
 	return intel_de_wait_for_clear(display,
 				       psr_status_reg(display, cpu_transcoder),
 				       EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
@@ -3060,9 +3077,11 @@ void intel_psr_wait_for_idle_locked(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_stat
 			continue;
 
 		if (intel_dp->psr.sel_update_enabled)
-			ret = _psr2_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(new_crtc_state);
+			ret = _psr2_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(new_crtc_state,
+								 NULL);
 		else
-			ret = _psr1_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(new_crtc_state);
+			ret = _psr1_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(new_crtc_state,
+								 NULL);
 
 		if (ret)
 			drm_err(display->drm,
@@ -3070,6 +3089,18 @@ void intel_psr_wait_for_idle_locked(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_stat
 	}
 }
 
+void intel_psr_wait_for_idle_dsb(struct intel_dsb *dsb,
+				 const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
+{
+	if (!new_crtc_state->has_psr || new_crtc_state->has_panel_replay)
+		return;
+
+	if (new_crtc_state->has_sel_update)
+		_psr2_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(new_crtc_state, dsb);
+	else
+		_psr1_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(new_crtc_state, dsb);
+}
+
 static bool __psr_wait_for_idle_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 {
 	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
index 9b061a22361f..077751aa599f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ void intel_psr_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u32 psr_iir);
 void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
 void intel_psr_wait_for_idle_locked(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state);
+void intel_psr_wait_for_idle_dsb(struct intel_dsb *dsb,
+				 const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state);
 bool intel_psr_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
 int intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 				struct intel_crtc *crtc);
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-05  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-05  7:27 [PATCH v3 0/4] Wait PSR idle before on dsb commit Jouni Högander
2025-09-05  7:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/i915/psr: Pass intel_crtc_state instead of intel_dp in wait_for_idle Jouni Högander
2025-09-05  7:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Add new define for PSR idle timeout Jouni Högander
2025-09-05  7:27 ` Jouni Högander [this message]
2025-09-05  7:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/i915/psr: Add poll for checking PSR is idle before starting update Jouni Högander
2025-09-05  9:17   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-05  8:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Wait PSR idle before on dsb commit (rev3) Patchwork
2025-09-05  8:15 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-09-05 18:02 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-08  5:09 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Wait PSR idle before on dsb commit (rev4) Patchwork
2025-09-08  5:24 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-09-08  5:41 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-09-08  6:54 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-09-08  7:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Wait PSR idle before on dsb commit Hogander, Jouni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250905072708.2659411-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox