From: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
To: "Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Badal Nilawar" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
"Daniele Ceraolo Spurio" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next][V2] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Fix missing initialization of variable offset
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 11:22:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250924102208.9216-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com> (raw)
The variable offset is not being initialized, and it is only set inside
a for-loop if entry->name is the same as manifest_entry. In the case
where it is not initialized a non-zero check on offset is potentialy checking
a bogus uninitalized value. Fix this by initializing offset to zero.
Fixes: efa29317a553 ("drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Extract and print version info")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
---
V2: Fix identical issue in parse_lb_layout that I ommitted in the first
patch
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
index 38f3feb2aecd..8f5082e689dc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int parse_cpd_header(struct xe_late_bind_fw *lb_fw,
const struct gsc_manifest_header *manifest;
const struct gsc_cpd_entry *entry;
size_t min_size = sizeof(*header);
- u32 offset;
+ u32 offset = 0;
int i;
/* manifest_entry is mandatory */
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static int parse_lb_layout(struct xe_late_bind_fw *lb_fw,
const struct csc_fpt_header *header = data;
const struct csc_fpt_entry *entry;
size_t min_size = sizeof(*header);
- u32 offset;
+ u32 offset = 0;
int i;
/* fpt_entry is mandatory */
--
2.51.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-09-24 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 10:22 Colin Ian King [this message]
2025-09-24 10:53 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Fix missing initialization of variable offset (rev2) Patchwork
2025-09-24 10:54 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-09-24 11:29 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-09-24 14:08 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-25 12:04 ` [PATCH][next][V2] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Fix missing initialization of variable offset Nilawar, Badal
2025-09-29 15:49 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-09-30 14:32 ` Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250924102208.9216-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--to=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox