Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Cavitt, Jonathan" <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Cc: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
	"Colin Ian King" <colin.i.king@gmail.com>,
	"De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
	"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
	<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next][V2] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Fix missing initialization of variable offset
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:32:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNvp7rEGBvrwdQr1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CH0PR11MB5444AAF5F484F5F35522F994E51BA@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 11:49:24AM -0400, Cavitt, Jonathan wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-xe <intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Nilawar, Badal
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2025 5:05 AM
> To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>; De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>; Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>; David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>; Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>; Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>; intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][next][V2] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Fix missing initialization of variable offset
> > 
> > On 24-09-2025 15:52, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > > The variable offset is not being initialized, and it is only set inside
> > > a for-loop if entry->name is the same as manifest_entry. In the case
> > > where it is not initialized a non-zero check on offset is potentialy checking
> > > a bogus uninitalized value. Fix this by initializing offset to zero.
> > >
> > > Fixes: efa29317a553 ("drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Extract and print version info")
> > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>

pushed to drm-xe-next. Thanks for the patch and reviews.

> -Jonathan Cavitt
> 
> > > ---
> > >
> > > V2: Fix identical issue in parse_lb_layout that I ommitted in the first
> > > patch
> > >
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c | 4 ++--
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
> > > index 38f3feb2aecd..8f5082e689dc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
> > > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int parse_cpd_header(struct xe_late_bind_fw *lb_fw,
> > >   	const struct gsc_manifest_header *manifest;
> > >   	const struct gsc_cpd_entry *entry;
> > >   	size_t min_size = sizeof(*header);
> > > -	u32 offset;
> > > +	u32 offset = 0;
> > >   	int i;
> > >   
> > >   	/* manifest_entry is mandatory */
> > > @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static int parse_lb_layout(struct xe_late_bind_fw *lb_fw,
> > >   	const struct csc_fpt_header *header = data;
> > >   	const struct csc_fpt_entry *entry;
> > >   	size_t min_size = sizeof(*header);
> > > -	u32 offset;
> > > +	u32 offset = 0;
> > >   	int i;
> > >   
> > >   	/* fpt_entry is mandatory */
> > 

      reply	other threads:[~2025-09-30 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-24 10:22 [PATCH][next][V2] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Fix missing initialization of variable offset Colin Ian King
2025-09-24 10:53 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Fix missing initialization of variable offset (rev2) Patchwork
2025-09-24 10:54 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-09-24 11:29 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-09-24 14:08 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-25 12:04 ` [PATCH][next][V2] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Fix missing initialization of variable offset Nilawar, Badal
2025-09-29 15:49   ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-09-30 14:32     ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aNvp7rEGBvrwdQr1@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox