From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Cavitt, Jonathan" <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Cc: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
"Colin Ian King" <colin.i.king@gmail.com>,
"De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next][V2] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Fix missing initialization of variable offset
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:32:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNvp7rEGBvrwdQr1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CH0PR11MB5444AAF5F484F5F35522F994E51BA@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 11:49:24AM -0400, Cavitt, Jonathan wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-xe <intel-xe-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Nilawar, Badal
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2025 5:05 AM
> To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>; De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>; Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>; David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>; Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>; Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>; intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][next][V2] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Fix missing initialization of variable offset
> >
> > On 24-09-2025 15:52, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > > The variable offset is not being initialized, and it is only set inside
> > > a for-loop if entry->name is the same as manifest_entry. In the case
> > > where it is not initialized a non-zero check on offset is potentialy checking
> > > a bogus uninitalized value. Fix this by initializing offset to zero.
> > >
> > > Fixes: efa29317a553 ("drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Extract and print version info")
> > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
pushed to drm-xe-next. Thanks for the patch and reviews.
> -Jonathan Cavitt
>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > V2: Fix identical issue in parse_lb_layout that I ommitted in the first
> > > patch
> > >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
> > > index 38f3feb2aecd..8f5082e689dc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw.c
> > > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int parse_cpd_header(struct xe_late_bind_fw *lb_fw,
> > > const struct gsc_manifest_header *manifest;
> > > const struct gsc_cpd_entry *entry;
> > > size_t min_size = sizeof(*header);
> > > - u32 offset;
> > > + u32 offset = 0;
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > /* manifest_entry is mandatory */
> > > @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static int parse_lb_layout(struct xe_late_bind_fw *lb_fw,
> > > const struct csc_fpt_header *header = data;
> > > const struct csc_fpt_entry *entry;
> > > size_t min_size = sizeof(*header);
> > > - u32 offset;
> > > + u32 offset = 0;
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > /* fpt_entry is mandatory */
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-30 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 10:22 [PATCH][next][V2] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Fix missing initialization of variable offset Colin Ian King
2025-09-24 10:53 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Fix missing initialization of variable offset (rev2) Patchwork
2025-09-24 10:54 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-09-24 11:29 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-09-24 14:08 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-25 12:04 ` [PATCH][next][V2] drm/xe/xe_late_bind_fw: Fix missing initialization of variable offset Nilawar, Badal
2025-09-29 15:49 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-09-30 14:32 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aNvp7rEGBvrwdQr1@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox