Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jonathan.cavitt@intel.com, saurabhg.gupta@intel.com,
	alex.zuo@intel.com, michal.wajdeczko@intel.com,
	matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/xe: Guard against NULL GT in xe_pmu.c
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 20:09:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250926200917.164618-9-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250926200917.164618-7-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>

Static analysis reveals the following issue:
xe_device_get_gt is theoretically able to return NULL in some cases, but
several use cases don't check the return value before performing a
dereference, resulting in a NULL pointer dereference.

Add guards against this in xe_pmu.c:
- Use xe_root_mmio_gt instead of xe_device_get_gt for the gt id 0 case.
- Modify event_supported and event_gt_forcewake to take a
  struct xe_gt gt pointer.
- Only perform xe_force_wake_put in xe_pmu_event_destroy if gt exists.

v2:
- Pass xe_gt to event_gt_forcewake (Michal)
  - Above necessitated passing xe_gt to event_supported (jcavitt)
- Only perform xe_force_wake_put in xe_pmu_event_destroy if gt exists.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pmu.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pmu.c
index cab51d826345..d54981510a43 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pmu.c
@@ -130,18 +130,15 @@ static bool is_gt_frequency_event(struct perf_event *event)
 	       id == XE_PMU_EVENT_GT_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY;
 }
 
-static bool event_gt_forcewake(struct perf_event *event)
+static bool event_gt_forcewake(struct perf_event *event, struct xe_gt *gt)
 {
 	struct xe_device *xe = container_of(event->pmu, typeof(*xe), pmu.base);
 	u64 config = event->attr.config;
-	struct xe_gt *gt;
 	unsigned int *fw_ref;
 
 	if (!is_engine_event(config) && !is_gt_frequency_event(event))
 		return true;
 
-	gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, config_to_gt_id(config));
-
 	fw_ref = kzalloc(sizeof(*fw_ref), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!fw_ref)
 		return false;
@@ -157,11 +154,10 @@ static bool event_gt_forcewake(struct perf_event *event)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static bool event_supported(struct xe_pmu *pmu, unsigned int gt_id,
+static bool event_supported(struct xe_pmu *pmu, struct xe_gt *gt,
 			    unsigned int id)
 {
 	struct xe_device *xe = container_of(pmu, typeof(*xe), pmu);
-	struct xe_gt *gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, gt_id);
 
 	if (!gt)
 		return false;
@@ -219,7 +215,10 @@ static void xe_pmu_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event)
 
 	if (fw_ref) {
 		gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, config_to_gt_id(event->attr.config));
-		xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), *fw_ref);
+
+		if (gt)
+			xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), *fw_ref);
+
 		kfree(fw_ref);
 		event->pmu_private = NULL;
 	}
@@ -233,7 +232,8 @@ static int xe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct xe_device *xe = container_of(event->pmu, typeof(*xe), pmu.base);
 	struct xe_pmu *pmu = &xe->pmu;
-	unsigned int id, gt;
+	unsigned int id, gt_id;
+	struct xe_gt *gt;
 
 	if (!pmu->registered)
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -248,8 +248,9 @@ static int xe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (event->cpu < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	gt = config_to_gt_id(event->attr.config);
+	gt_id = config_to_gt_id(event->attr.config);
 	id = config_to_event_id(event->attr.config);
+	gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, gt_id);
 	if (!event_supported(pmu, gt, id))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
@@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ static int xe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (!event->parent) {
 		drm_dev_get(&xe->drm);
 		xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
-		if (!event_gt_forcewake(event)) {
+		if (!event_gt_forcewake(event, gt)) {
 			xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
 			drm_dev_put(&xe->drm);
 			return -EINVAL;
@@ -443,13 +444,18 @@ static ssize_t event_attr_show(struct device *dev,
 				       struct attribute *attr, int idx) \
 	{								\
 		struct perf_pmu_events_attr *pmu_attr;			\
+		struct xe_device *xe;					\
 		struct xe_pmu *pmu;					\
+		struct xe_gt *gt;					\
 									\
 		pmu_attr = container_of(attr, typeof(*pmu_attr), attr.attr); \
 		pmu = container_of(dev_get_drvdata(kobj_to_dev(kobj)),	\
 				   typeof(*pmu), base);			\
 									\
-		return event_supported(pmu, 0, id_) ? attr->mode : 0;	\
+		xe = container_of(pmu, typeof(*xe), pmu);		\
+		gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);				\
+									\
+		return event_supported(pmu, gt, id_) ? attr->mode : 0;	\
 	}								\
 	static const struct attribute_group pmu_group_ ##v_ = {		\
 		.name = "events",					\
@@ -497,7 +503,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *pmu_events_attr_update[] = {
 static void set_supported_events(struct xe_pmu *pmu)
 {
 	struct xe_device *xe = container_of(pmu, typeof(*xe), pmu);
-	struct xe_gt *gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, 0);
+	struct xe_gt *gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
 
 	if (!xe->info.skip_guc_pc) {
 		pmu->supported_events |= BIT_ULL(XE_PMU_EVENT_GT_C6_RESIDENCY);
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-26 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-26 20:09 [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe: Guard against NULL return for xe_device_get_gt Jonathan Cavitt
2025-09-26 20:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/xe: Guard against NULL GT in xe_sriov_vf.c Jonathan Cavitt
2025-10-13 21:13   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-09-26 20:09 ` Jonathan Cavitt [this message]
2025-10-13 21:19   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/xe: Guard against NULL GT in xe_pmu.c Rodrigo Vivi
2025-09-26 20:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/xe: Don't call xe_device_get_gt twice in xe_hw_engine_lookup Jonathan Cavitt
2025-09-29 10:25   ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2025-09-26 20:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/xe: Guard against NULL GT in xe_guc.c Jonathan Cavitt
2025-10-13 21:14   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-09-26 20:09 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/xe/tests: Use xe_root_mmio_gt instead of xe_device_get_gt Jonathan Cavitt
2025-09-26 20:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Guard against NULL return for xe_device_get_gt Patchwork
2025-09-26 20:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-09-27  3:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250926200917.164618-9-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
    --to=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
    --cc=alex.zuo@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=saurabhg.gupta@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox