Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <saurabhg.gupta@intel.com>,
	<alex.zuo@intel.com>, <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/xe: Guard against NULL GT in xe_guc.c
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 17:14:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aO1rqyoSZS4g2C5w@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250926200917.164618-11-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 08:09:22PM +0000, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> Static analysis reveals the following issue:
> xe_device_get_gt is theoretically able to return NULL in some cases, but
> several use cases don't check the return value before performing a
> dereference, resulting in a NULL pointer dereference.
> 
> Use xe_assert to assert root_gt is not NULL before dereferencing it.
> 
> While we're here, replace xe_device_get_gt(xe, 0) with the equivalent
> call xe_root_mmio_gt(xe).  There's no reason to use the flexible
> xe_device_get_gt function when we're only always tring to get GT0 here.
> 
> v2: xe_assert root_gt is not NULL (Michal, Matt)

I really don't believe this is what they suggested.
I had understood that the suggestion was to mark the case as false
positive in the tool.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index d5adbbb013ec..38fba439f1e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -466,10 +466,13 @@ static int guc_g2g_alloc(struct xe_guc *guc)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	if (gt->info.id != 0) {
> -		struct xe_gt *root_gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, 0);
> -		struct xe_guc *root_guc = &root_gt->uc.guc;
> +		struct xe_gt *root_gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
> +		struct xe_guc *root_guc;
>  		struct xe_bo *bo;
>  
> +		xe_assert(xe, root_gt);
> +		root_guc = &root_gt->uc.guc;
> +
>  		bo = xe_bo_get(root_guc->g2g.bo);
>  		if (!bo)
>  			return -ENODEV;
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-13 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-26 20:09 [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe: Guard against NULL return for xe_device_get_gt Jonathan Cavitt
2025-09-26 20:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/xe: Guard against NULL GT in xe_sriov_vf.c Jonathan Cavitt
2025-10-13 21:13   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-09-26 20:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/xe: Guard against NULL GT in xe_pmu.c Jonathan Cavitt
2025-10-13 21:19   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-09-26 20:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/xe: Don't call xe_device_get_gt twice in xe_hw_engine_lookup Jonathan Cavitt
2025-09-29 10:25   ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2025-09-26 20:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/xe: Guard against NULL GT in xe_guc.c Jonathan Cavitt
2025-10-13 21:14   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-09-26 20:09 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/xe/tests: Use xe_root_mmio_gt instead of xe_device_get_gt Jonathan Cavitt
2025-09-26 20:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Guard against NULL return for xe_device_get_gt Patchwork
2025-09-26 20:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-09-27  3:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aO1rqyoSZS4g2C5w@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=alex.zuo@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=saurabhg.gupta@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox