Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Introduce intel_compute_global_watermarks_late()
Date: Wed,  8 Oct 2025 21:25:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251008182559.20615-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251008182559.20615-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Add a late watermarks computation stage for skl+. Need this
(temporarily perhaps) to get the final cdclk values into
skl_wm_check_vblank().

But the order is actually wrong now for SAGV. For SAGV we
want to first do skl_wm_check_vblank(), then copute
crttc_state->use_sagv_wm, and then do intel_bw_atomic_check().

Scalers are completely borked as far as skl_wm_check_vblank()
goes as well.

TODO: just a hack really, need to figure out the correct order
      for real

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |  4 ++
 .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wm.c       | 10 +++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wm.h       |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c  | 38 ++++++++++++++++---
 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index afa78774eaeb..54ed36183ebe 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -6455,6 +6455,10 @@ int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
 			return ret;
 	}
 
+	ret = intel_compute_global_watermarks_late(state);
+	if (ret)
+		goto fail;
+
 	ret = intel_pmdemand_atomic_check(state);
 	if (ret)
 		goto fail;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
index df4da52cbdb3..62bd894a72f9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct intel_wm_funcs {
 	void (*optimize_watermarks)(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 				    struct intel_crtc *crtc);
 	int (*compute_global_watermarks)(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
+	int (*compute_global_watermarks_late)(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
 	void (*get_hw_state)(struct intel_display *display);
 	void (*sanitize)(struct intel_display *display);
 };
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wm.c
index f887a664fe22..3035d9879d83 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wm.c
@@ -104,6 +104,16 @@ int intel_compute_global_watermarks(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int intel_compute_global_watermarks_late(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+{
+	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(state);
+
+	if (display->funcs.wm->compute_global_watermarks_late)
+		return display->funcs.wm->compute_global_watermarks_late(state);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 void intel_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_display *display)
 {
 	if (display->funcs.wm->get_hw_state)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wm.h
index 9ad4e9eae5ca..9f69dc5dfda5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wm.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wm.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ void intel_atomic_update_watermarks(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 void intel_optimize_watermarks(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 			       struct intel_crtc *crtc);
 int intel_compute_global_watermarks(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
+int intel_compute_global_watermarks_late(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
 void intel_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_display *display);
 void intel_wm_sanitize(struct intel_display *display);
 bool intel_wm_plane_visible(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
index aac3ca8f6c0f..5c18fe9a5237 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
@@ -2433,7 +2433,7 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 
 	crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal = crtc_state->wm.skl.raw;
 
-	return skl_wm_check_vblank(crtc_state);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static bool skl_wm_level_equals(const struct skl_wm_level *l1,
@@ -3002,11 +3002,6 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/*
-	 * skl_compute_ddb() will have adjusted the final watermarks
-	 * based on how much ddb is available. Now we can actually
-	 * check if the final watermarks changed.
-	 */
 	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
 		struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm = &new_crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal;
 
@@ -3030,6 +3025,36 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 		pipe_wm->use_sagv_wm = !HAS_HW_SAGV_WM(display) &&
 			DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12 &&
 			intel_crtc_can_enable_sagv(new_crtc_state);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+skl_compute_wm_late(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+{
+	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
+	struct intel_crtc_state __maybe_unused *new_crtc_state;
+	int i;
+
+	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
+		int ret;
+
+		/*
+		 * FIXME we need something along the lins of the following order:
+		 * 1. intel_atomic_setup_scalers() (needed by skl_wm_check_vblank())
+		 * 2. intel_modeset_calc_cdclk() (needed by skl_wm_check_vblank())
+		 * 3. skl_compute_wm() (skl_wm_check_vblank() + update use_sagv_wm)
+		 * 4. intel_bw_atomic_check() (needs use_sagv_wm)
+		 * but shuffling all that needs a lot more work...
+		 *
+		 * For now hack it by deferreing skl_wm_check_vblank() until
+		 * intel_modeset_calc_cdclk() has been done. Scalers are still
+		 * completely broken wrt. skl_wm_check_vblank().
+		 */
+		ret = skl_wm_check_vblank(new_crtc_state);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 
 		ret = skl_wm_add_affected_planes(state, crtc);
 		if (ret)
@@ -4060,6 +4085,7 @@ void intel_wm_state_verify(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 
 static const struct intel_wm_funcs skl_wm_funcs = {
 	.compute_global_watermarks = skl_compute_wm,
+	.compute_global_watermarks_late = skl_compute_wm_late,
 	.get_hw_state = skl_wm_get_hw_state,
 	.sanitize = skl_wm_sanitize,
 };
-- 
2.49.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-08 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-08 18:25 [RFC][PATCH 00/11] drm/i915/prefill: Introduce helpers for prefill latency calculations Ville Syrjala
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Reject modes with linetime > 64 usec Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 15:15   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/cdclk: Add prefill helpers for CDCLK Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 16:11   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/cdclk: Add intel_cdclk_min_cdclk_for_prefill() Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 16:25   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/dsc: Add prefill helper for DSC Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 16:26   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/scaler: Add scaler prefill helpers Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 17:56   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/11] drm/i195/wm: Add WM0 " Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 18:30   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-13 21:49     ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-08 18:25 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2025-10-13 18:36   ` [RFC][PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Introduce intel_compute_global_watermarks_late() Shankar, Uma
2025-10-13 20:35     ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/prefill: Introduce intel_prefill.c Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 18:42   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-13 21:37     ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/wm: Use intel_prefill Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 18:43   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/prefill: Print the prefill details Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 18:45   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/prefill: Also print out the worst case estimates Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 18:47   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 19:10 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/prefill: Introduce helpers for prefill latency calculations Patchwork
2025-10-08 19:11 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-08 19:26 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-10-08 19:58 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-10-08 23:13 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251008182559.20615-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox