From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/27] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 13:43:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251114214335.2388972-38-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251114214335.2388972-29-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Use scope-based cleanup for forcewake and runtime pm. This allows us to
eliminate some goto-based error handling and simplify other functions.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pxp.c | 55 ++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pxp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pxp.c
index bdbdbbf6a678..508f4c128a48 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pxp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pxp.c
@@ -58,10 +58,9 @@ bool xe_pxp_is_enabled(const struct xe_pxp *pxp)
static bool pxp_prerequisites_done(const struct xe_pxp *pxp)
{
struct xe_gt *gt = pxp->gt;
- unsigned int fw_ref;
bool ready;
- fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+ CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
/*
* If force_wake fails we could falsely report the prerequisites as not
@@ -71,14 +70,12 @@ static bool pxp_prerequisites_done(const struct xe_pxp *pxp)
* PXP. Therefore, we can just log the force_wake error and not escalate
* it.
*/
- XE_WARN_ON(!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL));
+ XE_WARN_ON(!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref.domains, XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL));
/* PXP requires both HuC authentication via GSC and GSC proxy initialized */
ready = xe_huc_is_authenticated(>->uc.huc, XE_HUC_AUTH_VIA_GSC) &&
xe_gsc_proxy_init_done(>->uc.gsc);
- xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
-
return ready;
}
@@ -104,13 +101,12 @@ int xe_pxp_get_readiness_status(struct xe_pxp *pxp)
xe_uc_fw_status_to_error(pxp->gt->uc.gsc.fw.status))
return -EIO;
- xe_pm_runtime_get(pxp->xe);
+ guard(xe_pm_runtime)(pxp->xe);
/* PXP requires both HuC loaded and GSC proxy initialized */
if (pxp_prerequisites_done(pxp))
ret = 1;
- xe_pm_runtime_put(pxp->xe);
return ret;
}
@@ -135,35 +131,28 @@ static void pxp_invalidate_queues(struct xe_pxp *pxp);
static int pxp_terminate_hw(struct xe_pxp *pxp)
{
struct xe_gt *gt = pxp->gt;
- unsigned int fw_ref;
int ret = 0;
drm_dbg(&pxp->xe->drm, "Terminating PXP\n");
- fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
- if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FW_GT)) {
- ret = -EIO;
- goto out;
- }
+ CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
+ if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref.domains, XE_FW_GT))
+ return -EIO;
/* terminate the hw session */
ret = xe_pxp_submit_session_termination(pxp, ARB_SESSION);
if (ret)
- goto out;
+ return ret;
ret = pxp_wait_for_session_state(pxp, ARB_SESSION, false);
if (ret)
- goto out;
+ return ret;
/* Trigger full HW cleanup */
xe_mmio_write32(>->mmio, KCR_GLOBAL_TERMINATE, 1);
/* now we can tell the GSC to clean up its own state */
- ret = xe_pxp_submit_session_invalidation(&pxp->gsc_res, ARB_SESSION);
-
-out:
- xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
- return ret;
+ return xe_pxp_submit_session_invalidation(&pxp->gsc_res, ARB_SESSION);
}
static void mark_termination_in_progress(struct xe_pxp *pxp)
@@ -326,14 +315,12 @@ static int kcr_pxp_set_status(const struct xe_pxp *pxp, bool enable)
{
u32 val = enable ? _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(KCR_INIT_ALLOW_DISPLAY_ME_WRITES) :
_MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(KCR_INIT_ALLOW_DISPLAY_ME_WRITES);
- unsigned int fw_ref;
- fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(pxp->gt), XE_FW_GT);
- if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FW_GT))
+ CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(pxp->gt), XE_FW_GT);
+ if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref.domains, XE_FW_GT))
return -EIO;
xe_mmio_write32(&pxp->gt->mmio, KCR_INIT, val);
- xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(pxp->gt), fw_ref);
return 0;
}
@@ -453,34 +440,28 @@ int xe_pxp_init(struct xe_device *xe)
static int __pxp_start_arb_session(struct xe_pxp *pxp)
{
int ret;
- unsigned int fw_ref;
- fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(pxp->gt), XE_FW_GT);
- if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FW_GT))
+ CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(pxp->gt), XE_FW_GT);
+ if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref.domains, XE_FW_GT))
return -EIO;
- if (pxp_session_is_in_play(pxp, ARB_SESSION)) {
- ret = -EEXIST;
- goto out_force_wake;
- }
+ if (pxp_session_is_in_play(pxp, ARB_SESSION))
+ return -EEXIST;
ret = xe_pxp_submit_session_init(&pxp->gsc_res, ARB_SESSION);
if (ret) {
drm_err(&pxp->xe->drm, "Failed to init PXP arb session: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
- goto out_force_wake;
+ return ret;
}
ret = pxp_wait_for_session_state(pxp, ARB_SESSION, true);
if (ret) {
drm_err(&pxp->xe->drm, "PXP ARB session failed to go in play%pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
- goto out_force_wake;
+ return ret;
}
drm_dbg(&pxp->xe->drm, "PXP ARB session is active\n");
-
-out_force_wake:
- xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(pxp->gt), fw_ref);
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
/**
--
2.51.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-14 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-14 21:43 [PATCH v3 00/27] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 01/27] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-17 22:03 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-17 22:17 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 02/27] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-17 22:04 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 03/27] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 04/27] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 05/27] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 06/27] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 07/27] drm/xe/mocs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 08/27] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 10/27] drm/xe/gsc: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 11/27] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 12/27] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-17 22:09 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 13/27] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-17 22:11 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 14/27] drm/xe: Return forcewake reference type from force_wake_get_any_engine() Matt Roper
2025-11-17 22:19 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 15/27] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-17 22:28 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 16/27] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 17/27] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 18/27] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 19/27] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 20/27] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 21/27] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 22/27] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 23/27] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:44 ` [PATCH v3 24/27] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:44 ` [PATCH v3 25/27] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:44 ` [PATCH v3 26/27] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:44 ` [PATCH v3 27/27] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-14 23:22 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM (rev4) Patchwork
2025-11-14 23:23 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-15 0:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-15 11:18 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251114214335.2388972-38-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox