From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 17/27] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 13:43:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251114214335.2388972-46-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251114214335.2388972-29-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Use scope-based forcewake in the HuC code for a small simplification and
consistency with other parts of the driver.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c
index 0a70c8924582..4212162913af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c
@@ -300,19 +300,16 @@ void xe_huc_sanitize(struct xe_huc *huc)
void xe_huc_print_info(struct xe_huc *huc, struct drm_printer *p)
{
struct xe_gt *gt = huc_to_gt(huc);
- unsigned int fw_ref;
xe_uc_fw_print(&huc->fw, p);
if (!xe_uc_fw_is_enabled(&huc->fw))
return;
- fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
- if (!fw_ref)
+ CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
+ if (!fw_ref.domains)
return;
drm_printf(p, "\nHuC status: 0x%08x\n",
xe_mmio_read32(>->mmio, HUC_KERNEL_LOAD_INFO));
-
- xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
}
--
2.51.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-14 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-14 21:43 [PATCH v3 00/27] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 01/27] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-17 22:03 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-17 22:17 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 02/27] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-17 22:04 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 03/27] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 04/27] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 05/27] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 06/27] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 07/27] drm/xe/mocs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 08/27] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 09/27] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 10/27] drm/xe/gsc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 11/27] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 12/27] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-17 22:09 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 13/27] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-17 22:11 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 14/27] drm/xe: Return forcewake reference type from force_wake_get_any_engine() Matt Roper
2025-11-17 22:19 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 15/27] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-17 22:28 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 16/27] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 18/27] drm/xe/query: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 19/27] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 20/27] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 21/27] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 22/27] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 23/27] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:44 ` [PATCH v3 24/27] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:44 ` [PATCH v3 25/27] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:44 ` [PATCH v3 26/27] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-14 21:44 ` [PATCH v3 27/27] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-14 23:22 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM (rev4) Patchwork
2025-11-14 23:23 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-15 0:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-15 11:18 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251114214335.2388972-46-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox