public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sanjay Yadav <sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Arunpravin Paneer Selvam" <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>,
	"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/buddy: Prevent BUG_ON by validating rounded allocation
Date: Thu,  8 Jan 2026 17:02:29 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260108113227.2101872-5-sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260108113227.2101872-4-sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>

When DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION is set, the requested size is
rounded up to the next power-of-two via roundup_pow_of_two().
Similarly, for non-contiguous allocations with large min_block_size,
the size is aligned up via round_up(). Both operations can produce a
rounded size that exceeds mm->size, which later triggers
BUG_ON(order > mm->max_order).

Example scenarios:
- 9G CONTIGUOUS allocation on 10G VRAM memory:
  roundup_pow_of_two(9G) = 16G > 10G
- 9G allocation with 8G min_block_size on 10G VRAM memory:
  round_up(9G, 8G) = 16G > 10G

Fix this by checking the rounded size against mm->size. For
non-contiguous or range allocations where size > mm->size is invalid,
return -EINVAL immediately. For contiguous allocations without range
restrictions, allow the request to fall through to the existing
__alloc_contig_try_harder() fallback.

This ensures invalid user input returns an error or uses the fallback
path instead of hitting BUG_ON.

v2: (Matt A)
- Add Fixes, Cc stable, and Closes tags for context

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/6712
Fixes: 0a1844bf0b53 ("drm/buddy: Improve contiguous memory allocation")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.7+
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Yadav <sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
index 2f279b46bd2c..5141348fc6c9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
@@ -1155,6 +1155,15 @@ int drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(struct drm_buddy *mm,
 	order = fls(pages) - 1;
 	min_order = ilog2(min_block_size) - ilog2(mm->chunk_size);
 
+	if (order > mm->max_order || size > mm->size) {
+		if ((flags & DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION) &&
+		    !(flags & DRM_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION))
+			return __alloc_contig_try_harder(mm, original_size,
+							 original_min_size, blocks);
+
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	do {
 		order = min(order, (unsigned int)fls(pages) - 1);
 		BUG_ON(order > mm->max_order);
-- 
2.52.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-08 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-08 11:32 [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/buddy: Fix BUG_ON from oversized rounded allocations Sanjay Yadav
2026-01-08 11:32 ` Sanjay Yadav [this message]
2026-01-20 10:41   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/buddy: Prevent BUG_ON by validating rounded allocation Matthew Auld
2026-01-21  6:36     ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2026-01-21 10:00       ` Matthew Auld
2026-01-08 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/tests/drm_buddy: Add tests for allocations exceeding max_order Sanjay Yadav
2026-01-08 11:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/buddy: Fix BUG_ON from oversized rounded allocations (rev2) Patchwork
2026-01-08 12:01 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2026-01-08 12:24 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2026-01-08 15:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260108113227.2101872-5-sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com \
    --to=sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com \
    --cc=Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox