From: Sanjay Yadav <sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Arunpravin Paneer Selvam" <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>,
"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/tests/drm_buddy: Add tests for allocations exceeding max_order
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 17:02:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260108113227.2101872-6-sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260108113227.2101872-4-sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>
Add kunit tests that exercise edge cases where allocation requests
exceed mm->max_order after rounding. This can happen with
non-power-of-two VRAM sizes when the allocator rounds up requests.
For example, with 10G VRAM (8G + 2G roots), mm->max_order represents
the 8G block. A 9G allocation can round up to 16G in multiple ways:
CONTIGUOUS allocation rounds to next power-of-two, or non-CONTIGUOUS
with 8G min_block_size rounds to next alignment boundary.
The test validates CONTIGUOUS and RANGE flag combinations, ensuring that
only CONTIGUOUS-alone allocations use try_harder fallback, while other
combinations return -EINVAL when rounded size exceeds memory, preventing
BUG_ON assertions.
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Yadav <sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
index 5f40b5343bd8..e6f8459c6c54 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
@@ -857,6 +857,40 @@ static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_limit(struct kunit *test)
drm_buddy_fini(&mm);
}
+static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_exceeds_max_order(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ u64 mm_size = SZ_8G + SZ_2G, size = SZ_8G + SZ_1G, min_block_size = SZ_8G;
+ struct drm_buddy mm;
+ LIST_HEAD(blocks);
+ int err;
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_init(&mm, mm_size, SZ_4K),
+ "buddy_init failed\n");
+
+ /* CONTIGUOUS allocation should succeed via try_harder fallback */
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size, size,
+ SZ_4K, &blocks,
+ DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
+ "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%llu\n", size);
+ drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &blocks, 0);
+
+ /* Non-CONTIGUOUS with large min_block_size should return -EINVAL */
+ err = drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size, size, min_block_size, &blocks, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, err, -EINVAL);
+
+ /* Non-CONTIGUOUS + RANGE with large min_block_size should return -EINVAL */
+ err = drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size, size, min_block_size, &blocks,
+ DRM_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, err, -EINVAL);
+
+ /* CONTIGUOUS + RANGE should return -EINVAL (no try_harder for RANGE) */
+ err = drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size, size, SZ_4K, &blocks,
+ DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION | DRM_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, err, -EINVAL);
+
+ drm_buddy_fini(&mm);
+}
+
static int drm_buddy_suite_init(struct kunit_suite *suite)
{
while (!random_seed)
@@ -877,6 +911,7 @@ static struct kunit_case drm_buddy_tests[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_buddy_alloc_clear),
KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_buddy_alloc_range_bias),
KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_buddy_fragmentation_performance),
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_buddy_alloc_exceeds_max_order),
{}
};
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-08 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-08 11:32 [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/buddy: Fix BUG_ON from oversized rounded allocations Sanjay Yadav
2026-01-08 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/buddy: Prevent BUG_ON by validating rounded allocation Sanjay Yadav
2026-01-20 10:41 ` Matthew Auld
2026-01-21 6:36 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2026-01-21 10:00 ` Matthew Auld
2026-01-08 11:32 ` Sanjay Yadav [this message]
2026-01-08 11:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/buddy: Fix BUG_ON from oversized rounded allocations (rev2) Patchwork
2026-01-08 12:01 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2026-01-08 12:24 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2026-01-08 15:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260108113227.2101872-6-sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com \
--to=sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com \
--cc=Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox