From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] replace system_unbound_wq, add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 15:53:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260124145401.44992-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
Hi,
=== Current situation: problems ===
Let's consider a nohz_full system with isolated CPUs: wq_unbound_cpumask is
set to the housekeeping CPUs, for !WQ_UNBOUND the local CPU is selected.
This leads to different scenarios if a work item is scheduled on an
isolated CPU where "delay" value is 0 or greater then 0:
schedule_delayed_work(, 0);
This will be handled by __queue_work() that will queue the work item on the
current local (isolated) CPU, while:
schedule_delayed_work(, 1);
Will move the timer on an housekeeping CPU, and schedule the work there.
Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
=== Recent changes to the WQ API ===
The following, address the recent changes in the Workqueue API:
- commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
- commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
The old workqueues will be removed in a future release cycle.
=== Introduced Changes by this series ===
1) [P 1] Replace uses of system_unbound_wq
system_unbound_wq is to be used when locality is not required.
Because of that, system_unbound_wq has been replaced with
system_dfl_wq, to make sure this would be the default choice
when locality is not important.
system_dfl_wq behave like system_unbound_wq.
2) [P 2] add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue()
This change adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request
alloc_workqueue() to be per-cpu when WQ_UNBOUND has not been specified.
The behavior is the same.
Thanks!
---
Changes in v3:
- rebased on v6.19-rc6 (on master specifically)
- commit logs improved
Changes in v2:
- rebased on v6.18-rc4.
- commit logs integrated with the appropriate workqueue API commit hash.
Marco Crivellari (2):
drm/xe: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
drm/xe: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_group.c | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 4 ++--
9 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--
2.52.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-01-24 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-24 14:53 Marco Crivellari [this message]
2026-01-24 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/xe: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2026-01-30 22:03 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-02-02 9:16 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-01-24 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/xe: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260124145401.44992-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox