Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/xe: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 15:54:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260124145401.44992-3-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260124145401.44992-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>

This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with
the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in:

   commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
   commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")

The refactoring is going to alter the default behavior of
alloc_workqueue() to be unbound by default.

With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
must now use WQ_PERCPU. For more details see the Link tag below.

In order to keep alloc_workqueue() behavior identical, explicitly request
WQ_PERCPU.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c          | 4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c            | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_group.c | 3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov.c           | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
index cf29e259861f..1b20ea03a938 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
@@ -488,8 +488,8 @@ struct xe_device *xe_device_create(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 	xe->preempt_fence_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("xe-preempt-fence-wq",
 						       WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
 	xe->ordered_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("xe-ordered-wq", 0);
-	xe->unordered_wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-unordered-wq", 0, 0);
-	xe->destroy_wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-destroy-wq", 0, 0);
+	xe->unordered_wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-unordered-wq", WQ_PERCPU, 0);
+	xe->destroy_wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-destroy-wq", WQ_PERCPU, 0);
 	if (!xe->ordered_wq || !xe->unordered_wq ||
 	    !xe->preempt_fence_wq || !xe->destroy_wq) {
 		/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
index 793d7324a395..0849917b16c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ int xe_ggtt_init_early(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
 	else
 		ggtt->pt_ops = &xelp_pt_ops;
 
-	ggtt->wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-ggtt-wq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
+	ggtt->wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-ggtt-wq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_PERCPU, 0);
 	if (!ggtt->wq)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_group.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_group.c
index fa4db5f23342..8526addcdf42 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_group.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_group.c
@@ -48,7 +48,8 @@ hw_engine_group_alloc(struct xe_device *xe)
 	if (!group)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-	group->resume_wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-resume-lr-jobs-wq", 0, 0);
+	group->resume_wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-resume-lr-jobs-wq", WQ_PERCPU,
+					   0);
 	if (!group->resume_wq)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov.c
index ea411944609b..f3835867fce5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov.c
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ int xe_sriov_init(struct xe_device *xe)
 		xe_sriov_vf_init_early(xe);
 
 	xe_assert(xe, !xe->sriov.wq);
-	xe->sriov.wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-sriov-wq", 0, 0);
+	xe->sriov.wq = alloc_workqueue("xe-sriov-wq", WQ_PERCPU, 0);
 	if (!xe->sriov.wq)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.52.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-24 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-24 14:53 [PATCH v3 0/2] replace system_unbound_wq, add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue Marco Crivellari
2026-01-24 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/xe: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2026-01-30 22:03   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-02-02  9:16     ` Marco Crivellari
2026-01-24 14:54 ` Marco Crivellari [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260124145401.44992-3-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox