From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Piotr Piórkowski" <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] drm/xe/nvlp: Implement Wa_14026539277
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 14:05:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260305220511.GO4694@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a4wm8flj.fsf@intel.com>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 12:23:52PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> writes:
>
> > Implement the KMD part of Wa_14026539277, which applies to NVL-P A0.
> > The KMD implementation is just one component of the workaround, which
> > also depends on Pcode to implement its part in order to be complete.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h | 4 ++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules | 2 ++
> > 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> > index 66ddad767ad4..a83cafbe03fd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> > @@ -452,6 +452,10 @@
> >
> > #define XEHPC_L3CLOS_MASK(i) XE_REG_MCR(0xb194 + (i) * 8)
> >
> > +#define L2COMPUTESIDECTRL XE_REG_MCR(0xb1c0)
> > +#define CECTRL REG_GENMASK(2, 1)
> > +#define CECTRL_CENODATA_ALWAYS REG_FIELD_PREP(CECTRL, 0x0)
> > +
> > #define XE2_GLOBAL_INVAL XE_REG(0xb404)
> >
> > #define XE2LPM_L3SQCREG2 XE_REG_MCR(0xb604)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> > index b455af1e6072..3c8692f9b8cf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> > @@ -450,6 +450,25 @@ int xe_gt_record_default_lrcs(struct xe_gt *gt)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > +static void xe_gt_wa_14026539277(struct xe_gt *gt)
> > +{
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + if (!XE_GT_WA(gt, 14026539277))
> > + return;
>
> It appears SRIOV VF wouldn't have access to the register below, right?
>
> Adding Piotr here, since we talked about it offline recently. Does
> implementing this only on PF side suffice?
>
> If so, should we return early here if on a VF or should we rather add a
> FUNC(xe_rtp_match_not_sriov_vf) in the rules for Wa_14026539277?
>
> One thing that I realize with the latter approach is that 14026539277
> would not be listed in the workarounds debugfs file. Do we really want
> that? I think this question applies to all cases where we use
> FUNC(xe_rtp_match_not_sriov_vf), not only this one.
Right, registers like this only have a single global copy in hardware,
and whatever the PF sets in there applies to everything on the system
(PFs and VFs). So adding FUNC(xe_rtp_match_not_sriov_vf) sounds correct
to me since this workaround only applies to PF drivers and isn't
applicable to VFs.
Matt
>
> --
> Gustavo Sousa
>
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * L2COMPUTESIDECTRL has a specific offset for media and the GSI offset
> > + * does not apply.
> > + */
> > + xe_gt_assert(gt, xe_gt_is_main_type(gt));
> > +
> > + val = xe_gt_mcr_unicast_read_any(gt, L2COMPUTESIDECTRL);
> > + val &= ~CECTRL;
> > + val |= CECTRL_CENODATA_ALWAYS;
> > + xe_gt_mcr_multicast_write(gt, L2COMPUTESIDECTRL, val);
> > +}
> > +
> > int xe_gt_init_early(struct xe_gt *gt)
> > {
> > int err;
> > @@ -575,6 +594,14 @@ static int gt_init_with_gt_forcewake(struct xe_gt *gt)
> > */
> > gt->info.gmdid = xe_mmio_read32(>->mmio, GMD_ID);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Wa_14026539277 can't be implemented as a regular GT workaround (i.e.
> > + * as an entry in gt_was[]) because we would get the hardware already in
> > + * a bad state by the time it would be applied. Hence, we implement it
> > + * as an OOB workaround and apply it early to prevent that.
> > + */
> > + xe_gt_wa_14026539277(gt);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
> > index 80b54b195f20..7f42436df6ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
> > @@ -58,3 +58,5 @@
> >
> > 14025883347 MEDIA_VERSION_RANGE(1301, 3503)
> > GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(2004, 3005)
> > +
> > +14026539277 PLATFORM(NOVALAKE_P), PLATFORM_STEP(A0, B0), GRAPHICS_VERSION(3510)
> >
> > --
> > 2.52.0
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-05 12:02 [PATCH 0/7] Extra enabling patches for NVL-P Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Modify stepping info directly in xe_step_*_get() Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:07 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/xe: Drop unused IS_PLATFORM_STEP() and IS_SUBPLATFORM_STEP() Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:09 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/xe/nvlp: Read platform-level stepping info Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:13 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/xe/rtp: Add support for matching platform-level stepping Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:22 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-06 0:53 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-06 13:39 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-06 16:40 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/xe/nvlp: Implement Wa_14026539277 Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 15:23 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:05 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/xe/xe3p: Drop Wa_16028780921 Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:23 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/xe: Translate C-state "reset value" into RC6 Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:25 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-06 11:37 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Extra enabling patches for NVL-P Patchwork
2026-03-06 12:16 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260305220511.GO4694@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=piotr.piorkowski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox