From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Modify stepping info directly in xe_step_*_get()
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 14:07:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260305220730.GP4694@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260305-extra-nvl-p-enabling-patches-v1-1-5020d5289dea@intel.com>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 09:02:28AM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> In an upcoming change, we will add a member to struct xe_step_info to
> represent the platform-level stepping. As such, we should stop assigning
> the value returned by functions xe_step_pre_gmdid_get() and
> xe_step_gmdid_get() directly to xe->info.step.
>
> Since there are no other users for those functions, let's simply update
> them to modify xe->info.step directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 6 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_step.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_step.h | 8 +++----
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> index 29f976e66848..72d4131e9775 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static int xe_info_init(struct xe_device *xe,
> if (desc->pre_gmdid_graphics_ip) {
> graphics_ip = desc->pre_gmdid_graphics_ip;
> media_ip = desc->pre_gmdid_media_ip;
> - xe->info.step = xe_step_pre_gmdid_get(xe);
> + xe_step_pre_gmdid_get(xe);
> } else {
> xe_assert(xe, !desc->pre_gmdid_media_ip);
> ret = handle_gmdid(xe, &graphics_ip, &media_ip,
> @@ -922,9 +922,7 @@ static int xe_info_init(struct xe_device *xe,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - xe->info.step = xe_step_gmdid_get(xe,
> - graphics_gmdid_revid,
> - media_gmdid_revid);
> + xe_step_gmdid_get(xe, graphics_gmdid_revid, media_gmdid_revid);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_step.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_step.c
> index 2860986f82f7..064b604b5b94 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_step.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_step.c
> @@ -115,15 +115,17 @@ __diag_pop();
> * Convert the PCI revid into proper IP steppings. This should only be
> * used on platforms that do not have GMD_ID support.
> */
> -struct xe_step_info xe_step_pre_gmdid_get(struct xe_device *xe)
> +void xe_step_pre_gmdid_get(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> const struct xe_step_info *revids = NULL;
> - struct xe_step_info step = {};
> u16 revid = xe->info.revid;
> int size = 0;
> const int *basedie_info = NULL;
> int basedie_size = 0;
> int baseid = 0;
> + u8 graphics = STEP_NONE;
> + u8 media = STEP_NONE;
> + u8 basedie = STEP_NONE;
>
> if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC) {
> baseid = FIELD_GET(GENMASK(5, 3), xe->info.revid);
> @@ -166,10 +168,12 @@ struct xe_step_info xe_step_pre_gmdid_get(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> /* Not using the stepping scheme for the platform yet. */
> if (!revids)
> - return step;
> + goto done;
>
> if (revid < size && revids[revid].graphics != STEP_NONE) {
> - step = revids[revid];
> + graphics = revids[revid].graphics;
> + media = revids[revid].media;
> + basedie = revids[revid].basedie;
> } else {
> drm_warn(&xe->drm, "Unknown revid 0x%02x\n", revid);
>
> @@ -187,25 +191,30 @@ struct xe_step_info xe_step_pre_gmdid_get(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (revid < size) {
> drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "Using steppings for revid 0x%02x\n",
> revid);
> - step = revids[revid];
> + graphics = revids[revid].graphics;
> + media = revids[revid].media;
> + basedie = revids[revid].basedie;
> } else {
> drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "Using future steppings\n");
> - step.graphics = STEP_FUTURE;
> + graphics = STEP_FUTURE;
> }
> }
>
> - drm_WARN_ON(&xe->drm, step.graphics == STEP_NONE);
> + drm_WARN_ON(&xe->drm, graphics == STEP_NONE);
>
> if (basedie_info && basedie_size) {
> if (baseid < basedie_size && basedie_info[baseid] != STEP_NONE) {
> - step.basedie = basedie_info[baseid];
> + basedie = basedie_info[baseid];
> } else {
> drm_warn(&xe->drm, "Unknown baseid 0x%02x\n", baseid);
> - step.basedie = STEP_FUTURE;
> + basedie = STEP_FUTURE;
> }
> }
>
> - return step;
> +done:
> + xe->info.step.graphics = graphics;
> + xe->info.step.media = media;
> + xe->info.step.basedie = basedie;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -220,28 +229,27 @@ struct xe_step_info xe_step_pre_gmdid_get(struct xe_device *xe)
> * all platforms: major steppings (A0, B0, etc.) are 4 apart, with minor
> * steppings (A1, A2, etc.) taking the values in between.
> */
> -struct xe_step_info xe_step_gmdid_get(struct xe_device *xe,
> - u32 graphics_gmdid_revid,
> - u32 media_gmdid_revid)
> +void xe_step_gmdid_get(struct xe_device *xe,
> + u32 graphics_gmdid_revid,
> + u32 media_gmdid_revid)
> {
> - struct xe_step_info step = {
> - .graphics = STEP_A0 + graphics_gmdid_revid,
> - .media = STEP_A0 + media_gmdid_revid,
> - };
> + u8 graphics = STEP_A0 + graphics_gmdid_revid;
> + u8 media = STEP_A0 + media_gmdid_revid;
>
> - if (step.graphics >= STEP_FUTURE) {
> - step.graphics = STEP_FUTURE;
> + if (graphics >= STEP_FUTURE) {
> + graphics = STEP_FUTURE;
> drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "Graphics GMD_ID revid value %d treated as future stepping\n",
> graphics_gmdid_revid);
> }
>
> - if (step.media >= STEP_FUTURE) {
> - step.media = STEP_FUTURE;
> + if (media >= STEP_FUTURE) {
> + media = STEP_FUTURE;
> drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "Media GMD_ID revid value %d treated as future stepping\n",
> media_gmdid_revid);
> }
>
> - return step;
> + xe->info.step.graphics = graphics;
> + xe->info.step.media = media;
> }
>
> #define STEP_NAME_CASE(name) \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_step.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_step.h
> index 686cb59200c2..6febb7fac476 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_step.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_step.h
> @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@
>
> struct xe_device;
>
> -struct xe_step_info xe_step_pre_gmdid_get(struct xe_device *xe);
> -struct xe_step_info xe_step_gmdid_get(struct xe_device *xe,
> - u32 graphics_gmdid_revid,
> - u32 media_gmdid_revid);
> +void xe_step_pre_gmdid_get(struct xe_device *xe);
> +void xe_step_gmdid_get(struct xe_device *xe,
> + u32 graphics_gmdid_revid,
> + u32 media_gmdid_revid);
> static inline u32 xe_step_to_gmdid(enum xe_step step) { return step - STEP_A0; }
>
> const char *xe_step_name(enum xe_step step);
>
> --
> 2.52.0
>
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-05 12:02 [PATCH 0/7] Extra enabling patches for NVL-P Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Modify stepping info directly in xe_step_*_get() Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:07 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/xe: Drop unused IS_PLATFORM_STEP() and IS_SUBPLATFORM_STEP() Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:09 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/xe/nvlp: Read platform-level stepping info Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:13 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/xe/rtp: Add support for matching platform-level stepping Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:22 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-06 0:53 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-06 13:39 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-06 16:40 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/xe/nvlp: Implement Wa_14026539277 Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 15:23 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:05 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/xe/xe3p: Drop Wa_16028780921 Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:23 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-05 12:02 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/xe: Translate C-state "reset value" into RC6 Gustavo Sousa
2026-03-05 22:25 ` Matt Roper
2026-03-06 11:37 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Extra enabling patches for NVL-P Patchwork
2026-03-06 12:16 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260305220730.GP4694@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox