public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	"Carlos Santa" <carlos.santa@intel.com>,
	"Christian Koenig" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Huang Rui" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
	"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Daniel Colascione" <dancol@dancol.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drm/ttm: Issue direct reclaim at beneficial_order
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:26:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260421012608.1474950-2-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421012608.1474950-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>

Triggering kswap at an order higher than beneficial_order makes little
sense, as the driver has already indicated the optimal order at which
reclaim is effective. Similarly, issuing direct reclaim or triggering
kswap at a lower order than beneficial_order is ineffective, since the
driver does not benefit from reclaiming lower-order pages.

As a result, direct reclaim should only be issued with __GFP_NORETRY at
exactly beneficial_order, or as a fallback, direct reclaim without
__GFP_NORETRY at order 0 when failure is not an option.

Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>
CC: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
index 26a3689e5fd9..8425dbcc6c68 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
@@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static struct page *ttm_pool_alloc_page(struct ttm_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp_flags,
 	 * Do not add latency to the allocation path for allocations orders
 	 * device tolds us do not bring them additional performance gains.
 	 */
-	if (beneficial_order && order > beneficial_order)
-		gfp_flags &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
+	if (order && beneficial_order && order != beneficial_order)
+		gfp_flags &= ~__GFP_RECLAIM;
 
 	if (!ttm_pool_uses_dma_alloc(pool)) {
 		p = alloc_pages_node(pool->nid, gfp_flags, order);
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-21  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-21  1:26 [PATCH 0/3] drm/ttm, drm/xe: Avoid reclaim/eviction loops under fragmentation Matthew Brost
2026-04-21  1:26 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-04-21  6:11   ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/ttm: Issue direct reclaim at beneficial_order Christian König
2026-04-22  4:12     ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-22  6:41       ` Christian König
2026-04-22  7:32   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-04-22  7:41     ` Christian König
2026-04-22 20:41       ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23  8:44         ` Christian König
2026-04-28 13:45         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-04-29 22:52           ` Daniel Colascione
2026-04-30  0:11             ` Dave Airlie
2026-04-30  7:59               ` Thomas Hellström
2026-04-30  8:14                 ` Christian König
2026-04-30  7:34             ` Christian König
2026-04-30  3:00           ` Matthew Brost
2026-05-01 20:04         ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2026-04-21  1:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Set TTM device beneficial_order to 9 (2M) Matthew Brost
2026-04-21  1:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Avoid shrinker reclaim from kswapd under fragmentation Matthew Brost
2026-04-22  8:22   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-04-22 20:27     ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-21  5:56 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/ttm, drm/xe: Avoid reclaim/eviction loops " Patchwork
2026-04-21  6:43 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-21  8:29 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260421012608.1474950-2-matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=carlos.santa@intel.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dancol@dancol.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox