From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/cdclk: Introduce crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:09:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715120926.10786-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715120926.10786-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
We'll need to do additional adjustments to the pipe pixel rate
for the purposes of min CDCLK calculations. Add a new
crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk for that purpose. We'll leave the
original crtc_state->pixel_rate for data rate related calculations
since we presumably don't need those extra adjustments there.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/hsw_ips.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 8 ++++++--
.../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 7 +++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 2 +-
.../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c | 18 +++++++++---------
8 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/hsw_ips.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/hsw_ips.c
index cbaef3f13f00..f828ec962164 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/hsw_ips.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/hsw_ips.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int _hsw_ips_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
if (display->platform.broadwell)
- return DIV_ROUND_UP(crtc_state->pixel_rate * 100, 95);
+ return DIV_ROUND_UP(crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk * 100, 95);
/* no IPS specific limits to worry about */
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c
index 70734d32a409..b3dbcd53999a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c
@@ -418,13 +418,13 @@ static int i9xx_plane_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
unsigned int num, den;
/*
- * Note that crtc_state->pixel_rate accounts for both
+ * Note that crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk accounts for both
* horizontal and vertical panel fitter downscaling factors.
* Pre-HSW bspec tells us to only consider the horizontal
* downscaling factor here. We ignore that and just consider
* both for simplicity.
*/
- pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate;
+ pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk;
i9xx_plane_ratio(crtc_state, plane_state, &num, &den);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
index 12bb6c414683..a53d88727177 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -2936,7 +2936,7 @@ static int _intel_pixel_rate_to_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
static int intel_pixel_rate_to_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
- return _intel_pixel_rate_to_cdclk(crtc_state, crtc_state->pixel_rate);
+ return _intel_pixel_rate_to_cdclk(crtc_state, crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk);
}
static int intel_planes_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 38763a6802c5..df43be51b3ba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -2259,13 +2259,16 @@ static void intel_crtc_compute_pixel_rate(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
- if (HAS_GMCH(display))
+ if (HAS_GMCH(display)) {
/* FIXME calculate proper pipe pixel rate for GMCH pfit */
crtc_state->pixel_rate =
crtc_state->hw.pipe_mode.crtc_clock;
- else
+ crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk = crtc_state->pixel_rate;
+ } else {
crtc_state->pixel_rate =
ilk_pipe_pixel_rate(crtc_state);
+ crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk = crtc_state->pixel_rate;
+ }
}
static void intel_joiner_adjust_timings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
@@ -5382,6 +5385,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pch_pfit.casf.strength);
PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(scaler_state.scaler_id);
+ PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pixel_rate_cdclk);
PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pixel_rate);
PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(gamma_mode);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
index 8bd213db5e7a..17336ad6d5e9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
@@ -1083,6 +1083,13 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
*/
unsigned int pixel_rate;
+ /*
+ * Pipe pixel rate for CDCLK, adjusted for
+ * panel fitter/pipe scaler downscaling.
+ * CDCLK use cases need further adjustment.
+ */
+ unsigned int pixel_rate_cdclk;
+
/* Whether to set up the PCH/FDI. Note that we never allow sharing
* between pch encoders and cpu encoders. */
bool has_pch_encoder;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
index a7d02dd6ca96..cd889f7429bb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
@@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ static int _intel_fbc_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
/* WaFbcExceedCdClockThreshold:hsw,bdw */
if (display->platform.haswell || display->platform.broadwell)
- return DIV_ROUND_UP(crtc_state->pixel_rate * 100, 95);
+ return DIV_ROUND_UP(crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk * 100, 95);
/* no FBC specific limits to worry about */
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
index 14d829171c7d..6aed88173770 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct intel_display *display)
*/
if (plane_state->uapi.visible && plane->min_cdclk)
crtc_state->plane_min_cdclk[plane->id] =
- DIV_ROUND_UP(crtc_state->pixel_rate,
+ DIV_ROUND_UP(crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk,
intel_cdclk_ppc(display, crtc_state->double_wide));
drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
"[PLANE:%d:%s] min_cdclk %d kHz\n",
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
index 6a65f92e8a03..9fe9d2644958 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
@@ -241,13 +241,13 @@ int vlv_plane_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
unsigned int num, den;
/*
- * Note that crtc_state->pixel_rate accounts for both
+ * Note that crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk accounts for both
* horizontal and vertical panel fitter downscaling factors.
* Pre-HSW bspec tells us to only consider the horizontal
* downscaling factor here. We ignore that and just consider
* both for simplicity.
*/
- pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate;
+ pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk;
vlv_plane_ratio(crtc_state, plane_state, &num, &den);
@@ -550,13 +550,13 @@ int ivb_plane_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
unsigned int num, den;
/*
- * Note that crtc_state->pixel_rate accounts for both
+ * Note that crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk accounts for both
* horizontal and vertical panel fitter downscaling factors.
* Pre-HSW bspec tells us to only consider the horizontal
* downscaling factor here. We ignore that and just consider
* both for simplicity.
*/
- pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate;
+ pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk;
ivb_plane_ratio(crtc_state, plane_state, &num, &den);
@@ -570,13 +570,13 @@ static int ivb_sprite_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
unsigned int num, den;
/*
- * Note that crtc_state->pixel_rate accounts for both
+ * Note that crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk accounts for both
* horizontal and vertical panel fitter downscaling factors.
* Pre-HSW bspec tells us to only consider the horizontal
* downscaling factor here. We ignore that and just consider
* both for simplicity.
*/
- pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate;
+ pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk;
src_w = drm_rect_width(&plane_state->uapi.src) >> 16;
dst_w = drm_rect_width(&plane_state->uapi.dst);
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ static void hsw_plane_ratio(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
int hsw_plane_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
{
- unsigned int pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate;
+ unsigned int pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk;
unsigned int num, den;
hsw_plane_ratio(crtc_state, plane_state, &num, &den);
@@ -918,13 +918,13 @@ static int g4x_sprite_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
unsigned int limit, decimate;
/*
- * Note that crtc_state->pixel_rate accounts for both
+ * Note that crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk accounts for both
* horizontal and vertical panel fitter downscaling factors.
* Pre-HSW bspec tells us to only consider the horizontal
* downscaling factor here. We ignore that and just consider
* both for simplicity.
*/
- pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate;
+ pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk;
/* Horizontal downscaling limits the maximum pixel rate */
hscale = drm_rect_calc_hscale(&plane_state->uapi.src,
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 12:09 [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915/cdclk: Workaround some kind of scaler 2PPC issue Ville Syrjala
2026-07-15 12:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/cdclk: Use intel_cdclk_ppc() in intel_modeset_readout_hw_state() Ville Syrjala
2026-07-16 3:59 ` Garg, Nemesa
2026-07-15 12:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/cdclk: Introduce HAS_2PPC() Ville Syrjala
2026-07-16 4:03 ` Garg, Nemesa
2026-07-15 12:09 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2026-07-16 4:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/cdclk: Introduce crtc_state->pixel_rate_cdclk Garg, Nemesa
2026-07-15 12:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/cdclk: Deal with 2 PPC hscale issues when calculating min CDCLK Ville Syrjala
2026-07-16 4:01 ` Garg, Nemesa
2026-07-16 10:58 ` Srinivas, Vidya
2026-07-15 13:28 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/cdclk: Workaround some kind of scaler 2PPC issue Patchwork
2026-07-15 13:29 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-07-15 14:06 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-15 15:53 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715120926.10786-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox