Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] drm/xe/vsec: Protect against missing config
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 16:36:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824163635.C03301F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824162317.2450380-15-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Medium] Subsystem guidelines violation: The patch uses the absence of `soc_remapper.set_telem_region` as a proxy check to prevent execution on Virtual Functions (VF) instead of an explicit `IS_SRIOV_VF()` guard.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The `xe_pmt_cb` struct is missing the `.read_reg` and `.write_reg` callbacks required for safe PMT Crashlog control register access on discrete GPUs.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v3 03/10] drm/xe/vsec: Protect against missing config ---
commit 6d90522f74020b6e17f1f98588ed1740977adfb4
Author: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>

drm/xe/vsec: Protect against missing config

This commit prevents PMT registration and telemetry read access when the
soc-remapper callbacks are not configured, specifically targeting Virtual
Function (VF) init paths.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>  
>  	switch (platform) {
>  	case XE_VSEC_BMG:
> +		if (!xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region)
> +			return;

[Severity: Medium]
The commit message mentions that some init paths (VF) will not provide
soc-remapper callbacks. Is it safe to use this feature presence as a proxy
check to prevent execution on Virtual Functions?

According to the SR-IOV guidelines for the xe driver, VFs must be explicitly
blocked from PF-only resource registration using an IS_SRIOV_VF() guard to
prevent hardware failures and MMIO timeouts.

Should this code explicitly check for the VF context instead of relying on
the absence of the set_telem_region callback?

>  		info->priv_data = &xe_pmt_cb;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does assigning xe_pmt_cb here expose us to
unprotected MMIO accesses during suspend?

Since BMG exposes VSEC_CAP_CRASHLOG in xe_vsec_info, the crashlog driver
will probe and create sysfs entries. However, the xe_pmt_cb structure lacks
the .read_reg and .write_reg callbacks.

When userspace accesses crashlog sysfs attributes, the driver will fall back
to using direct readl()/writel() on entry->disc_table.

If the GPU is in D3cold, will these direct accesses bypass runtime PM checks
and attempt to read or write powered-off MMIO, potentially triggering MCE or
AER kernel panics?

>  		break;
>  	default:

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824162317.2450380-12-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-24 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-24 16:23 [PATCH v3 00/10] Crescent Island PMT support Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] platform/x86/intel/pmt: complete pcidev to device update Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 18:56   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25  9:40     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-25  9:25   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add register access callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 18:39     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-25  9:34   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-26 16:13     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-26 18:30       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-27 17:05         ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] drm/xe/vsec: Protect against missing config Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:36   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-24 18:43     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-24 19:01     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] drm/xe/vsec: Use correct pm state get Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 19:04   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] drm/xe/vsec: Support possible hotplug exit Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 19:07   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/xe/vsec: Support Crescent Island PMT Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 19:10   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25 10:19   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT decode Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 10:24   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 18:47     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] drm/xe/vsec: Support late bind fw information Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 19:15   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-26 13:45     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-25 10:01   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] drm/xe/vsec: Update PMT internal access for CRI Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 19:18   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25 10:16   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-25  6:44 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Crescent Island PMT support (rev5) Patchwork
2026-08-25  7:29 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-25 10:56 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260824163635.C03301F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox