From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <hansg@kernel.org>,
<ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>, <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, <airlied@gmail.com>,
<simona@ffwll.ch>, <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
<anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>, <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <james.ausmus@intel.com>,
<karthik.poosa@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] drm/xe/vsec: Support late bind fw information
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:15:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoyYUxEN4PTA0s1E@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824162317.2450380-21-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 09:23:25AM -0700, Michael J. Ruhl wrote:
> CRI FW is loaded on power on. Because of this, access to
> the FW cannot be done until it is running.
>
> Update the XE PMT probe and access to check for late bind
> devices, verify, and wait for the appropriate FW state
> before probe or access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 4 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 74d566693dfd..bf02f881095f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -1140,7 +1140,9 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> xe_gt_sanitize_freq(gt);
>
> - xe_vsec_init(xe);
> + err = xe_vsec_init(xe);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_unregister_display;
>
> err = xe_sriov_init_late(xe);
> if (err)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> index 3f1a70813a99..5d9e6e66c665 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> @@ -468,6 +468,10 @@ struct xe_device {
> struct mutex lock;
> /** @pmt.base_offset: device specific base offset */
> u64 base_offset;
> + /** @pmt.work: support late-bind probe */
> + struct delayed_work work;
> + /** @pmt.retry_count: late-bind probe retry */
> + u32 retry_count;
> } pmt;
>
> /** @soc_remapper: SoC remapper object */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> index 578d59048b39..edc20c24137e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> #include <linux/bits.h>
> #include <linux/cleanup.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/intel_vsec.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -17,6 +18,7 @@
> #include "xe_mmio.h"
> #include "xe_platform_types.h"
> #include "xe_pm.h"
> +#include "xe_sysctrl.h"
> #include "xe_vsec.h"
>
> #include "regs/xe_pmt.h"
> @@ -162,6 +164,14 @@ enum capability {
> WATCHER,
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Late bind will delay 100msec for up to 20 seconds
> + */
> +#define VSEC_LATE_BIND_DELAY_MSEC (100)
> +#define VSEC_LATE_BIND_RETRY (200)
> +
> +static void cri_late_bind_probe(struct xe_device *xe);
> +
> static int bmg_guid_decode(u32 guid, int *index, u32 *offset)
> {
> u32 record_id = FIELD_GET(GUID_RECORD_ID, guid);
> @@ -272,6 +282,56 @@ static int xe_guid_decode(u32 guid, int *index, u32 *offset)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> +#define WAITING_FOR_SYCTLR
> +#ifdef WAITING_FOR_SYCTLR
I'm afraid you forgot to remove this before sending... or what's the goal of these?
> +static bool xe_is_oobmsm_fw_ready(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static void cri_late_bind_probe_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = container_of(work, struct xe_device, pmt.work.work);
> +
> + if (xe_is_oobmsm_fw_ready(xe)) {
> + cri_late_bind_probe(xe);
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + xe->pmt.retry_count++;
> +
> + /* wait up to 20 seconds */
> + if (xe->pmt.retry_count == VSEC_LATE_BIND_RETRY) {
> + drm_warn(&xe->drm, "PMT probe: Late Binding failed to complete\n");
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!schedule_delayed_work(&xe->pmt.work, msecs_to_jiffies(VSEC_LATE_BIND_DELAY_MSEC)))
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +}
> +
> +static bool wait_for_fw(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + int retries = VSEC_LATE_BIND_RETRY; /* wait up to 20 secs */
> +
> + if (xe->info.platform != XE_CRESCENTISLAND)
> + return true;
> +
> + while (retries--) {
> + if (xe_is_oobmsm_fw_ready(xe))
> + return true;
> +
> + msleep(VSEC_LATE_BIND_DELAY_MSEC);
> + }
> +
> + drm_warn(&xe->drm, "Late Binding failed to complete\n");
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * xe_pmt_telem_read is a callback API. I.e this can be accessed external to
> * XE driver (PMT driver scope). Because of this, DRM hotplug needs to be
> @@ -318,6 +378,11 @@ int xe_pmt_telem_read(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u64 *data, loff_t user_offse
> goto dev_exit;
> }
>
> + if (!wait_for_fw(xe)) {
> + ret = -ENODATA;
> + goto runtime_exit;
> + }
> +
> mutex_lock(&xe->pmt.lock);
>
> /* set SoC re-mapper index register based on GUID memory region */
> @@ -327,6 +392,7 @@ int xe_pmt_telem_read(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u64 *data, loff_t user_offse
>
> mutex_unlock(&xe->pmt.lock);
>
> +runtime_exit:
> xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>
> dev_exit:
> @@ -374,6 +440,10 @@ static int xe_pmt_read_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 *reg, u32 offset)
> disc_addr += CRI_DISCOVERY_OFFSET + inst + offset;
>
> xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> + if (!wait_for_fw(xe)) {
> + ret = -ENODATA;
> + goto runtime_exit;
> + }
> mutex_lock(&xe->pmt.lock);
>
> xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
> @@ -381,6 +451,8 @@ static int xe_pmt_read_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 *reg, u32 offset)
> memcpy_fromio(reg, disc_addr, sizeof(*reg));
>
> mutex_unlock(&xe->pmt.lock);
> +
> +runtime_exit:
> xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>
> dev_exit:
> @@ -416,6 +488,10 @@ static int xe_pmt_write_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 reg, u32 offset)
> disc_addr += CRI_DISCOVERY_OFFSET + inst + offset;
>
> xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> + if (!wait_for_fw(xe)) {
> + ret = -ENODATA;
> + goto runtime_exit;
> + }
> mutex_lock(&xe->pmt.lock);
>
> xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
> @@ -423,6 +499,8 @@ static int xe_pmt_write_reg(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u32 reg, u32 offset)
> memcpy_toio(disc_addr, ®, sizeof(reg));
>
> mutex_unlock(&xe->pmt.lock);
> +
> +runtime_exit:
> xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>
> dev_exit:
> @@ -454,12 +532,44 @@ static enum xe_vsec get_platform_info(struct xe_device *xe)
> return vsec_platforms[xe->info.platform];
> }
>
> +static void cri_late_bind_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + struct intel_vsec_platform_info *info;
> + struct device *dev = xe->drm.dev;
> + enum xe_vsec platform;
> +
> + platform = get_platform_info(xe);
> + if (platform != XE_VSEC_CRI)
> + return;
> +
> + info = &xe_vsec_info[platform];
> + if (!info->headers)
> + return;
> +
> + info->priv_data = &xe_cri_pmt_cb;
> + xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
> +
> + intel_vsec_register(dev, info);
> +}
> +
> +static void vsec_disable_late_bind_work(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = arg;
> +
> + /*
> + * If was work was cancelled while it was still pending, we need to
> + * take care of releasing the runtime reference
> + */
> + if (disable_delayed_work_sync(&xe->pmt.work))
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * xe_vsec_init - Initialize resources and add intel_vsec auxiliary
> * interface
> * @xe: valid xe instance
> */
> -void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> +int xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> struct intel_vsec_platform_info *info;
> struct device *dev = xe->drm.dev;
> @@ -467,30 +577,44 @@ void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> platform = get_platform_info(xe);
> if (platform == XE_VSEC_UNKNOWN)
> - return;
> + return 0;
>
> info = &xe_vsec_info[platform];
> if (!info->headers)
> - return;
> + return 0;
>
> switch (platform) {
> case XE_VSEC_BMG:
> if (!xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region)
> - return;
> + return 0;
> xe->pmt.base_offset = BMG_TELEMETRY_OFFSET;
> info->priv_data = &xe_bmg_pmt_cb;
> break;
>
> case XE_VSEC_CRI:
> if (!xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region)
> - return;
> + return 0;
> xe->pmt.base_offset = CRI_TELEMETRY_OFFSET;
> +
> + xe->pmt.retry_count = 0;
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&xe->pmt.work, cri_late_bind_probe_work);
> +
> + xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
> + if (!xe_is_oobmsm_fw_ready(xe)) {
> + schedule_delayed_work(&xe->pmt.work,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(VSEC_LATE_BIND_DELAY_MSEC));
> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev,
> + vsec_disable_late_bind_work,
> + xe);
> + }
> +
> info->priv_data = &xe_cri_pmt_cb;
> xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, CRI_IDX_TELEM_DISCOVERY);
> break;
>
> default:
> - break;
> + drm_err(&xe->drm, "Unsupported platform: %u\n", platform);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -498,5 +622,10 @@ void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> * resources.
> */
> intel_vsec_register(dev, info);
> +
> + if (platform == XE_VSEC_CRI)
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
> MODULE_IMPORT_NS("INTEL_VSEC");
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h
> index a25b4e6e681b..c4a1e2fc67d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.h
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> struct device;
> struct xe_device;
>
> -void xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe);
> +int xe_vsec_init(struct xe_device *xe);
> int xe_pmt_telem_read(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u64 *data, loff_t user_offset, u32 count);
>
> #endif
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 16:23 [PATCH v3 00/10] Crescent Island PMT support Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] platform/x86/intel/pmt: complete pcidev to device update Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 18:56 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25 9:40 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-25 9:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add register access callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 18:39 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-25 9:34 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-26 16:13 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-26 18:30 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-27 17:05 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] drm/xe/vsec: Protect against missing config Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 18:43 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-24 19:01 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] drm/xe/vsec: Use correct pm state get Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 19:04 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] drm/xe/vsec: Support possible hotplug exit Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 19:07 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/xe/vsec: Support Crescent Island PMT Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 19:10 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25 10:19 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT decode Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 10:24 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 18:47 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] drm/xe/vsec: Support late bind fw information Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 16:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 19:15 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-08-26 13:45 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-08-25 10:01 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-24 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] drm/xe/vsec: Update PMT internal access for CRI Michael J. Ruhl
2026-08-24 19:18 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25 10:16 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-08-25 6:44 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Crescent Island PMT support (rev5) Patchwork
2026-08-25 7:29 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-25 10:56 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aoyYUxEN4PTA0s1E@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=anoop.c.vijay@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=james.ausmus@intel.com \
--cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox