From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Raag Jadav" <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 08:50:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907085027.5D5281F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907083541.2194747-2-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Lockless TOCTOU race on work_struct initialization can lead to queueing an uninitialized work item.
--
commit 70fa657e4e9d6562a705a7808a6bc4a42f57256e
Author: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Subject: drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging
This commit introduces a GT ordered workqueue for GT wedge handling to
avoid disrupting the scheduler with in-flight jobs. It adds a wedge worker
initialized during GT init and queued when a wedge is declared.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index 478e047031f4f..200e34331c195 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1195,6 +1207,7 @@ void xe_gt_declare_wedged(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> xe_gt_assert(gt, gt_to_xe(gt)->wedged.mode);
>
> - xe_uc_declare_wedged(>->uc);
> - xe_tlb_inval_reset(>->tlb_inval);
> + /* Prevent queueing uninitialized worker if hit during probe */
> + if (gt->wedge.worker.func)
> + queue_work(gt->ordered_wq, >->wedge.worker);
[Severity: High]
Could this lockless check of the work_struct func field lead to list
corruption on weakly ordered architectures?
During driver probe, an asynchronous hardware fault (such as a PCI AER or
an I2C interrupt) could trigger xe_gt_declare_wedged() concurrently with
xe_gt_init().
In xe_gt_init(), the worker is initialized via:
INIT_WORK(>->wedge.worker, gt_wedge_worker);
This macro sets the work_struct's data, entry, and finally func, but does so
without memory barriers. If an interrupting CPU observes the writes out of
order due to CPU store reordering, func could be seen as non-NULL while data
or entry remain uninitialized.
If that happens, xe_gt_declare_wedged() would pass this check and call
queue_work() with a partially initialized work_struct. This can cause a
kernel panic in the workqueue core. Is there a safer way to synchronize
this probe-time wedge check without relying on lockless field inspection?
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260907083541.2194747-1-raag.jadav@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 8:34 [PATCH v3 0/5] Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-07 12:02 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-07 13:06 ` Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/xe: Move xe_device_wedged_fini() registration to xe_device_probe_early() Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 8:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/xe: Make xe_device_declare_wedged() IRQ safe Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/xe: Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:34 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/xe/ras: Move xe_ras_process_errors() to xe_ras Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 9:35 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce xe_wedge (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-07 9:37 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-07 10:26 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-07 11:39 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907085027.5D5281F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox