From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <riana.tauro@intel.com>, <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>,
<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
<rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 14:02:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3eb2bd0-119d-4c72-8332-721efb763c19@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907083541.2194747-2-raag.jadav@intel.com>
On 9/7/2026 10:34 AM, Raag Jadav wrote:
> Currently, xe_gt_declare_wedged() stops GuC CT and initiates exec queue
> teardown synchronously. This can result in tdr timeout in cases where
> the device is declared wedged while jobs are still in-flight.
>
> Introduce a worker for GT specific wedge handling and queue the teardown
> on GT ordered workqueue, so we don't disrupt the scheduler while jobs
> are still in-flight.
>
> Fixes: c9474b726b93 ("drm/xe: Wedge the entire device")
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> ---
> v2: Split fixes into separate patches (Rodrigo, Michal)
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index 478e047031f4..200e34331c19 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ static void xe_gt_enable_comp_1wcoh(struct xe_gt *gt)
> }
>
> static void gt_reset_worker(struct work_struct *w);
> +static void gt_wedge_worker(struct work_struct *w);
>
> static int emit_job_sync(struct xe_exec_queue *q, struct xe_bb *bb,
> long timeout_jiffies, bool force_reset)
> @@ -704,6 +705,8 @@ static void xe_gt_fini(void *arg)
> struct xe_gt *gt = arg;
> int i;
>
> + disable_work_sync(>->wedge.worker);
> +
> if (disable_work_sync(>->reset.worker))
> /*
> * If gt_reset_worker was halted from executing, take care of
> @@ -723,6 +726,7 @@ int xe_gt_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> int i;
>
> INIT_WORK(>->reset.worker, gt_reset_worker);
> + INIT_WORK(>->wedge.worker, gt_wedge_worker);
hmm, shouldn't this be done in xe_gt_alloc() ?
as xe_gt_init_early() seems to be doing something else and much later
>
> for (i = 0; i < XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX; ++i) {
> gt->ring_ops[i] = xe_ring_ops_get(gt, i);
> @@ -1005,6 +1009,14 @@ void xe_gt_reset_async(struct xe_gt *gt)
> xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> }
>
> +static void gt_wedge_worker(struct work_struct *w)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt = container_of(w, typeof(*gt), wedge.worker);
> +
> + xe_uc_declare_wedged(>->uc);
> + xe_tlb_inval_reset(>->tlb_inval);
> +}
> +
> void xe_gt_suspend_prepare(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> xe_uc_suspend_prepare(>->uc);
> @@ -1195,6 +1207,7 @@ void xe_gt_declare_wedged(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> xe_gt_assert(gt, gt_to_xe(gt)->wedged.mode);
>
> - xe_uc_declare_wedged(>->uc);
> - xe_tlb_inval_reset(>->tlb_inval);
> + /* Prevent queueing uninitialized worker if hit during probe */
> + if (gt->wedge.worker.func)
> + queue_work(gt->ordered_wq, >->wedge.worker);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
> index 628911346455..b11ac52b0ab7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
> @@ -233,6 +233,12 @@ struct xe_gt {
> struct work_struct worker;
> } reset;
>
> + /** @wedge: state for GT wedge */
> + struct {
> + /** @wedge.worker: worker for GT wedge to be done async */
> + struct work_struct worker;
> + } wedge;
> +
> /** @tlb_inval: TLB invalidation state */
> struct xe_tlb_inval tlb_inval;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 8:34 [PATCH v3 0/5] Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 12:02 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2026-09-07 13:06 ` Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/xe: Move xe_device_wedged_fini() registration to xe_device_probe_early() Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 8:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/xe: Make xe_device_declare_wedged() IRQ safe Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/xe: Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:34 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/xe/ras: Move xe_ras_process_errors() to xe_ras Raag Jadav
2026-09-07 8:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 9:35 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce xe_wedge (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-07 9:37 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-07 10:26 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-07 11:39 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3eb2bd0-119d-4c72-8332-721efb763c19@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox