Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Himal Prasad Ghimiray" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 21/21] drm/xe/svm: Distinguish access-counter-triggered range setup in logs
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 12:58:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909125807.BA63B1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909124457.1610890-44-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Incomplete implementation of debug trace context separation
--

commit 7432312b157971575fb03d4801aac465020f0d08
Author: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>

drm/xe/svm: Distinguish access-counter-triggered range setup in logs

This commit modifies __xe_svm_range_setup() to differentiate range_debug()
traces between page fault and access counter trigger paths.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> index 78a8c72cbbd68..d773a91d24922 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1429,7 +1432,9 @@ static int __xe_svm_range_setup(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma,
>  	range_debug(range, "GET PAGES");

[Severity: Medium]
This debug trace was missed and will log identically for both paths, failing
to provide the promised traceability. Should this code distinguish the paths
here too?

>  	err = xe_svm_range_get_pages(vm, range, &ctx);
>  	if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> -		range_debug(range, "PAGE FAULT - EVICTED PAGES");
> +		range_debug(range, acc_ctr_trigger ?
> +			    "ACCESS COUNTER TRIGGERED - EVICTED PAGES" :
> +			    "PAGE FAULT - EVICTED PAGES");
[ ... ]

In the same function, there is another debug log that still hardcodes the word
"fault":

drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c:__xe_svm_range_setup() {
    ...
		if (err) {
			if (migrate_try_count || !ctx.devmem_only) {
				drm_dbg(&vm->xe->drm,
					"VRAM allocation failed, falling back to retrying fault, asid=%u, errno=%pe\n",
					vm->usm.asid, ERR_PTR(err));
    ...
}

[Severity: Medium]
The log message incorrectly assumes it's always a 'fault', which goes against
the goal of correctly distinguishing the execution context. Are we missing an
update to this message for the access counter trigger path?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909124457.1610890-23-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com?part=21

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09 12:44 [RFC v2 00/21] drm/xe: Access counter support for migration hints Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:44 ` [RFC v2 01/21] drm/xe: Add xe_usm_queue generic USM circular buffer Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:44 ` [RFC v2 02/21] drm/xe: Stub out new access_counter layer Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:44 ` [RFC v2 03/21] drm/xe: Implement xe_access_counter_init Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:44 ` [RFC v2 04/21] drm/xe: Implement xe_access_counter_handler Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:44 ` [RFC v2 05/21] drm/xe: Extract xe_vma_lock_and_validate helper Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 06/21] drm/xe: Move ASID to FAULT VM lookup to xe_device Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 07/21] drm/xe/pf: Use xe_device_asid_to_vm in xe_pagefault_save_to_vm Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 08/21] drm/xe: Implement xe_access_counter_queue_work Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 09/21] drm/xe: Implement xe_access_counter_service Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 10/21] drm/xe/trace: Add xe_vma_acc trace event for access counter notifications Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 11/21] drm/xe/svm: Handle svm vma for acc_ctr trigger Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 12/21] drm/xe: Service all VMAs in an access counter granularity window Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 13/21] drm/xe: Add xe_guc_access_counter layer Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 14/21] drm/xe/uapi: Add access counter parameter extension for exec queue Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 15/21] drm/xe/lrc: Pass exec_queue to xe_lrc_create for access counter params Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 16/21] drm/xe/vm: Add xe_vma_supports_access_ctr() helper Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 17/21] drm/xe/pt: Set NC PTE bit for VMAs ineligible for access counting Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 18/21] drm/xe/svm: Define access counter migration policy Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 13:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 19/21] drm/xe/svm: Add MIGRATE_ON_ACCESS_COUNTER bind flag Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 20/21] drm/xe/svm: Move EVICTED PAGES debug log to callers Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 21/21] drm/xe/svm: Distinguish access-counter-triggered range setup in logs Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:58   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909125807.BA63B1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox