From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Himal Prasad Ghimiray" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 21/21] drm/xe/svm: Distinguish access-counter-triggered range setup in logs
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 12:58:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909125807.BA63B1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909124457.1610890-44-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Incomplete implementation of debug trace context separation
--
commit 7432312b157971575fb03d4801aac465020f0d08
Author: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
drm/xe/svm: Distinguish access-counter-triggered range setup in logs
This commit modifies __xe_svm_range_setup() to differentiate range_debug()
traces between page fault and access counter trigger paths.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> index 78a8c72cbbd68..d773a91d24922 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1429,7 +1432,9 @@ static int __xe_svm_range_setup(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma,
> range_debug(range, "GET PAGES");
[Severity: Medium]
This debug trace was missed and will log identically for both paths, failing
to provide the promised traceability. Should this code distinguish the paths
here too?
> err = xe_svm_range_get_pages(vm, range, &ctx);
> if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> - range_debug(range, "PAGE FAULT - EVICTED PAGES");
> + range_debug(range, acc_ctr_trigger ?
> + "ACCESS COUNTER TRIGGERED - EVICTED PAGES" :
> + "PAGE FAULT - EVICTED PAGES");
[ ... ]
In the same function, there is another debug log that still hardcodes the word
"fault":
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c:__xe_svm_range_setup() {
...
if (err) {
if (migrate_try_count || !ctx.devmem_only) {
drm_dbg(&vm->xe->drm,
"VRAM allocation failed, falling back to retrying fault, asid=%u, errno=%pe\n",
vm->usm.asid, ERR_PTR(err));
...
}
[Severity: Medium]
The log message incorrectly assumes it's always a 'fault', which goes against
the goal of correctly distinguishing the execution context. Are we missing an
update to this message for the access counter trigger path?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909124457.1610890-23-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com?part=21
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 12:44 [RFC v2 00/21] drm/xe: Access counter support for migration hints Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:44 ` [RFC v2 01/21] drm/xe: Add xe_usm_queue generic USM circular buffer Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:44 ` [RFC v2 02/21] drm/xe: Stub out new access_counter layer Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:44 ` [RFC v2 03/21] drm/xe: Implement xe_access_counter_init Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:44 ` [RFC v2 04/21] drm/xe: Implement xe_access_counter_handler Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:44 ` [RFC v2 05/21] drm/xe: Extract xe_vma_lock_and_validate helper Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 06/21] drm/xe: Move ASID to FAULT VM lookup to xe_device Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 07/21] drm/xe/pf: Use xe_device_asid_to_vm in xe_pagefault_save_to_vm Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 08/21] drm/xe: Implement xe_access_counter_queue_work Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 09/21] drm/xe: Implement xe_access_counter_service Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 10/21] drm/xe/trace: Add xe_vma_acc trace event for access counter notifications Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 11/21] drm/xe/svm: Handle svm vma for acc_ctr trigger Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 12/21] drm/xe: Service all VMAs in an access counter granularity window Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 13/21] drm/xe: Add xe_guc_access_counter layer Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 14/21] drm/xe/uapi: Add access counter parameter extension for exec queue Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 15/21] drm/xe/lrc: Pass exec_queue to xe_lrc_create for access counter params Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 16/21] drm/xe/vm: Add xe_vma_supports_access_ctr() helper Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 17/21] drm/xe/pt: Set NC PTE bit for VMAs ineligible for access counting Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 18/21] drm/xe/svm: Define access counter migration policy Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 13:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 19/21] drm/xe/svm: Add MIGRATE_ON_ACCESS_COUNTER bind flag Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 20/21] drm/xe/svm: Move EVICTED PAGES debug log to callers Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:45 ` [RFC v2 21/21] drm/xe/svm: Distinguish access-counter-triggered range setup in logs Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2026-09-09 12:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909125807.BA63B1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox